바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

Above- and below-ground vegetative responses to prescribed fire regimes in a Chesapeake Bay tidal brackish marsh

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2010, v.33 no.4, pp.351-361
Cheryl A. Leonard (George Mason University)
(George Mason Univ.)
Dixie Birch (Chesapeake Marshlands National Wildlife Refuge Complex)

Abstract

The primary purposes for using fire are to enhance marsh vegetation to support waterfowl, and to manage invasive plant species. The study was conducted for two consecutive years in 2004 and 2005, investigating the effects of prescribed fire regimes on vegetation biomass in tidal brackish marsh areas of the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge located on the eastern shore of Maryland, USA, that are under relatively similar environmental conditions. Four different burn regimes (i.e., annual burn, 3-5 year burn, 7-10 year burn, and no burn) were applied in the study. Above- and below-ground vegetation biomass samples as affected by the different burn regimes were harvested in each year for five plant species native to the marsh; Distichlis spicata, Spartina alterniflora, Schoenoplectus americanus, Spartina cynosuroides and Spartina patens. No significant difference was found either in total above-ground biomass or in above-ground biomass by species between burn regimes in 2004. However, more total above-ground biomass was produced in annual burn regime in 2005 than in the other burn regimes. There were no consistent effects of burning on vegetative biomass production by species, but it seemed D. spicata was somewhat benefited by prescribed burning for its biomass production. Moreover, the stem density for D. spicata under annual burn regime was significantly higher than that in the other burn regimes, showing some positive effects of burning on vegetation. The below-ground biomass was significantly greater in 2004 than in 2005, yet with no significant difference between burn regimes in either year. A longer-term monitoring is strongly recommended.

keywords
below-ground biomass, marsh vegetation, prescribed fire, tidal brackish marsh, vegetation biomass

Reference

1.

Abrahamson WG. 1984. Species responses to fire on the Florida Lake Wales Ridge. Am J Bot 71: 35-43.

2.

Bond WJ, Keeley JE. 2005. Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 387-394.

3.

Boyd CE. 1970. Production, mineral accumulation and pigment concentrations in Typha latifolia and Scirpus americanus. Ecology 51: 285-290.

4.

Brennan EK, Smith LM, Haukos DA, LaGrange TG. 2005. Short-term response of wetland birds to prescribed burning in Rainwater Basin wetlands. Wetlands 25: 667-674.

5.

Chamberlain JL. 1959. Gulf Coast marsh vegetation as food of wintering waterfowl. J Wildl Manag 23: 97-102.

6.

de la Cruz AA, Hackney CT. 1980. The Effects of Winter Fire and Harvest on the Vegetational Structure and Primary Productivity of Two Tidal Marsh Communities in Mississippi. Publication No. M-ASGP-80-013. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Ocean Springs, MS.

7.

Dudley JL, Lajtha K. 1993. The effects of prescribed burning on nutrient availability and primary production in sandplain grasslands. Am Midl Nat 130: 286-298.

8.

Flores C. 2003. Evaluation of vegetative response to fire exclusion and prescribed fire rotation on Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge and Fishing Bay Wildlife Management Area. MS Thesis. University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD, USA.

9.

Gabrey SW, Afton AD. 2001. Plant community composition and biomass in Gulf Coast Chenier Plain marshes: responses to winter burning and structural marsh management. Environ Manag 27: 281-293.

10.

Gabrey SW, Afton AD, Wilson BC. 1999. Effects of winter burning and structural marsh management on vegetation and winter bird abundance in the Gulf Coast Chenier Plain, USA. Wetlands 19: 594-606.

11.

Gallagher JL. 1974. Sampling macro-organic matter profiles in salt marsh plant root zones. Soil Sci Soc Am J 38: 154-155.

12.

Good RE, Good NF, Frasco BR. 1982. A review of primary production and decomposition dynamics of the belowground marsh component. In: Estuarine Comparisons (Kennedy VS, ed). Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 183-207.

13.

Gross MF, Hardisky MA, Wolf PL, Klemas V. 1991. Relationship between above-ground and below-ground biomass of Spartina alterniflora (Smooth Cordgrass). Estuaries 14: 180-191.

14.

Hackney CT, de la Cruz AA. 1981. Effects of fire on brackish marsh communities: management implications. Wetlands 1: 75-86.

15.

Hackney CT, de la Cruz AA. 1986. Belowground productivity of roots and rhizomes in a giant cordgrass marsh. Estuaries 9: 112-116.

16.

Hess TJ Jr. 1975. An evaluation of methods for managing stands of Scirpus olneyi. MS Thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

17.

Isacch JP, Holz S, Ricci L, Martinez MM. 2004. Post-fire vegetation change and bird use of a salt marsh in coastal Argentina. Wetlands 24: 235-243.

18.

Johnson LC, Matchett JR. 2001. Fire and grazing regulate belowground processes in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 82: 3377-3389.

19.

Johnson SR, Knapp AK. 1995. The effect of fire on gas exchange and aboveground biomass production in annually vs biennially burned Spartina pectinata wetlands. Wetlands 13: 299-303.

20.

Kirkman LK, Drew MB, Edwards D. 1998. Effects of experimental fire regimes on the population dynamics of Schwalbea americana L. Plant Ecol 137: 115-137.

21.

Komarek EV. 1974. Effects of fire on temperate forests and related ecosystems: southeastern United States. In: Fire and Ecosystems (Kozlowski TT, Ahlgren CE, eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 251-278.

22.

Kozlowski TT, Ahlgren CE. 1974. Fire and Ecosystems. Academic Press, New York, NY.

23.

Langley JA, McKee KL, Cahoon DR, Cherry JA, Megonigal JP. 2009. Elevated CO2 stimulates marsh elevation gain, counterbalancing seal-level rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 6182-6186.

24.

Lay DW. 1945. Muskrat investigations in Texas. J Wildl Manag 9: 56-76.

25.

Lynch JJ. 1941. The place of burning in management of the Gulf Coast wildlife refuges. J Wildl Manag 5: 454-457.

26.

Main MB, Barry MJ. 2002. Influence of season of fire on flowering of wet prairie grasses in South Florida, USA. Wetlands 22: 430-434.

27.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2009a. National weather service. http://www.nws.noaa.gov. Accessed 28 December 2009.

28.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2009b. Tides and currents: Cambridge, MD. http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/data_menu.shtml?stn=8571892%20Cambridge,%20MD&type=Historic+Tide+Data. Accessed 28 December 2009.

29.

Neely WW. 1962. Saline soils and brackish waters in management of wildlife, fish, and shrimp. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 27: 321-335.

30.

Odum WE. 1988. Comparative ecology of tidal freshwater and salt marshes. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19: 147-176.

31.

Omi PN. 2005. Forest Fires: A Reference Handbook. ABC-Clio, Santa Barbara, CA, pp 29-73.

32.

O’Neil T. 1949. The Muskrat in the Louisiana Coastal Marshes. Federal Aid Section-Fish and Game Division, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, New Orleans, LA.

33.

Pyne SJ. 2003. Introduction: fire’s lucky country. In: Fire in Ecosystems of South-West Western Australia: Impacts and Management (Abbott I, Burrows N, eds). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 1-8.

34.

Roman CT, Daiber FC. 1984. Aboveground and belowground primary production dynamics of two Delaware Bay tidal marshes. Bull Torrey Bot Club 111: 34-41.

35.

Saunders CJ, Megonigal JP, Reynolds JF. 2006. Comparison of belowground biomass in C3- and C4-dominated mixed communities in a Chesapeake Bay brackish marsh. Plant Soil 280: 305-322.

36.

Schmalzer PA, Hinkle CR. 1993. Effects of fire on nutrient concentrations and standing crops in biomass of Juncus roemerianus and Spartina bakeri marshes. Castanea 58: 90-114.

37.

Schmalzer PA, Hinkle CR, Mailander JL. 1991. Changes in community composition and biomass in Juncus roemerianus Scheele and Spartina bakeri Merr. marshes one year after a fire. Wetlands 11: 67-86.

38.

Schubauer JP, Hopkinson CS. 1984. Above- and belowground emergent macrophyte production and turnover in a coastal marsh ecosystem, Georgia. Limnol Oceanogr 29: 1052-1065.

39.

Sipple WS. 1979. A Review of the Biology, Ecology and Management of Scripus olneyi. Vol. II: A Synthesis of Selected References. Wetland Publication No. 4. Wetlands Permit Division, Water Resources Administration, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD, pp 85.

40.

Slocum MG, Platt WJ, Cooley HC. 2003. Effects of differences in prescribed fire regimes on patchiness and intensity of fires in subtropical savannas of Everglades National Park, Florida. Restor Ecol 11: 91-102.

41.

SPSS Inc. 2004. SPSS 13.0 for Windows Version. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.

42.

Turner RE, Swenson EM, Milan CS, Lee JM, Oswald TA. 2004. Below-ground biomass in healthy and impaired salt marshes. Ecol Res 19: 29-35.

43.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009a. Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge. http://www.fws.gov/blackwater/. Accessed 10 April 2009.

44.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2009b. Wetland restoration: Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge. http://www.fws.gov/blackwater/restore.html. Accessed 14 April 2009.

45.

Valiela I, Teal JM, Persson NY. 1976. Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh vegetation: belowground biomass. Limnol Oceanogr 21: 245-252.

46.

Waldrop TA, Lloyd FT. 1994. Forty years of prescribed burning on the Santee fire plots: effects on overstory and midstory vegetation. In: Fire and the Environment: Ecological and Cultural Perspectives (Nodvin SC, Waldrop TA, eds). Proceedings of an International Symposium. 1990 Mar 20-24, Knoxville, TN. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-69. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment, Asheville, NC.

47.

Ward P. 1968. Fire in relation to waterfowl habitat of the Delta marshes. Proc Tall Timbers Fire Ecol Conf 8: 254-267.

48.

Whigham DF, Simpson RL. 1978. The relationship between aboveground and belowground biomass of freshwater tidal wetland macrophytes. Aquat Bot 5: 355-364.

49.

Whigham DF, McCormick J, Good RE, Simpson RL. 1978. Biomass and primary production in freshwater tidal wetlands of the Middle Atlantic Coast. In: Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential (Good RE, Whigham DF, Simpson RL, eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 3-20.

50.

Zontek F. 1966. Prescribed burning on the St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge. Proc Tall Timbers Fire Ecol Conf 5: 195-210.

Journal of Ecology and Environment