바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

Controlling Mikania micrantha HBK: How effective manual cutting is?

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2012, v.35 no.3, pp.235-242
Rajesh Kumar Rai (Nepal/Deakin University)
Madan Sandilya (ComForM, Institute of Forestry)
Rajan Subedi (Institute of Forestry,)

Abstract

Mikania micrantha, a neo-tropical vine, is spreading rapidly in the tropical part of Nepal and is now threatening the rural ecosystem including biodiversity and rural livelihoods. However, no attempt has been made to control the spread of M. micrantha. As a result, the vines are spreading freely and rapidly. After a thorough literature review and assessment of forest management practices, we proposed a manual cutting method, as it suits the Nepalese situation for several reasons:required labor is readily available, as local communities are managing forest patches, and the method does not have any potential adverse effects on non-target native species. Experimental plots were laid out in August 2011 to examine the effectiveness of manual cutting. Two different site types based on canopy coverage were selected and divided into three blocks based on cutting strategy. Four treatments were assigned across the experimental plots following a complete block design. We harvested above-ground biomass according to the assigned treatment. The results suggested that there should be at least two consecutive cuttings within a 3-week interval before flowering, and that three consecutive cuttings resulted in 91% mortality of the vines. In addition, cutting promoted regeneration of native plant species. Employing regular cutting operations can modify understory shade enhancing regeneration of native species, which is a desirable condition to constrain proliferation of M. micrantha. Periodic cuttings reduced the competitiveness of M. micrantha regardless of canopy openness, but native ground cover should be retained.

keywords
canopy, manual cutting, Mikania micrantha, open woodland, regeneration

Reference

1.

Abraham M, Abraham CT, Joy PJ. 2002. Natural enemies on Mikania micrantha H.B.K. in Kerala. J Trop Agric 40: 39-41.

2.

Costanza R, Fisher B, Mulder K, Liu S, Christopher T. 2007. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecol Econ 61: 478-491.

3.

Do F. 2008. Management Information System. Department of Forests (DoF), Kathmandu.

4.

Feng HL, Cao HL, Liang XD, Zhou X, Ye WH. 2002. The distribution and harmful effect on Mikania micrantha in Guangdong. J Trop Subtrop Bot 10: 263-270. (in Chinese)

5.

Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP. 1977. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.

6.

Ipor IB. 1991. The effect of shade on the growth and development of Mikania micrantha H.B.K. Malays Appl Biol 20: 211-246.

7.

Kaufmann JC. 2004. Prickly pear cactus and pastoralism in Southwest Madagascar. Ethnology 43:345-361.

8.

Kuo YL. Chen TY, Lin CC. 2002. Using a periodiccutting method and allelopathy to control the invasive vine, Mikania micrantha H. B. K. Taiwan J For Sci 17: 171-181.

9.

Lian J, Ye W, Cao H, Lai Z, Liu S. 2006. Effects of periodic cutting on the structure of the Mikania micrantha community. Bot Stud 47: 185-190.

10.

Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, de Poorter M. 2000. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland.

11.

Miao SL, Li Y, Guo Q, Yu H, Ding J, Yu F, Liu J, Zhang X, Dong M. 2012. Potential alternatives to classical biocontrol: using native agents in invaded habitats and genetically engineered sterile cultivars for invasive plant management. Tree For Sci Biotechnol 6: 17-21.

12.

Nuñez MA, Pauchard A. 2010. Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all? Biol Invasions 12: 707-714.

13.

Poudel A, Baral HS, Ellison C, Subedi K, Thomas S, Murphy S. 2005. Mikania micrantha Weed Invasion in Nepal: A Summary Report. The First National Workshop for Stakeholders, 2004 Nov 25, Kathmandu, Nepal. Himalayan Nature, IUCN, Kathmandu and CAB International, Waliingford.

14.

Rai RK, Scarborough H, Subedi N, Lamichhane B. 2012. Invasive plants: Do they devastate or diversify rural livelihoods? Rural farmers’ perception of three invasive plants in Nepal. J Nat Conser 20: 170-176.

15.

Sapkota L. 2007. Ecology and management issues of Mikania micrantha in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Banko Janakari 17: 27-39.

16.

Shackleton CM, McGarry D, Fourie S, Gambiza J, Shackleton SE, Fabricius C. 2007. Assessing the effects of invasive alien species on rural livelihoods: case examples and a framework from South Africa. Hum Ecol 35: 113-127.

17.

Tiwari S, Adhikari B, Siwakoti M, Subedi K. 2005. An Inventory and Assessment of Invasive Alien Plant Species in Nepal. IUCN The World Conservation Union, Kathmandu.

18.

Waterhouse DF. 1994. Biological Control of Weeds: Southeast Asian Prospects. Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research, Canberra.

19.

Wen DZ, Ye WH, Feng HL, Cai CX. 2000. Comparison of basic photosynthetic haracteristics between exotic invader weed Mikania micrantha and its companion species. J Trop Subtrop Bot 8: 139-146.

20.

Willis M, Zerbe S, Kuo YL. 2008. Distribution and ecological range of the alien plant species Mikania micrantha Kunth (Asteraceae) in Taiwan. J Ecol Field Biol 31: 277-290.

21.

Ye WH, Zhou X. 2001. The plant killer-Mikania micrantha in South China. Aliens 13: 7.

22.

Zhang LY, Ye WH, Cao HL, Feng HL. 2004. Mikania micrantha H. B. K. in China: an overview. Weed Res 44: 42-49.

Journal of Ecology and Environment