바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

Distribution and abundance of wintering raptors in the Korean peninsula

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2013, v.36 no.4, pp.211-216
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.211
이상돈 (이화여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine distribution and abundance of wintering raptors in Korea during 2000-2007 which is a rare data set for covering large landscape areas. Total 6,643 raptors of 16 species were recorded at 94 different points in west, south and east coasts, and rivers of inland areas all over Korea. During the study period, the most abundant raptors were black vulture (Aegypius monachus, 62.3%), common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus, 11.0%) and common buzzard (Buteo buteo, 10.0%), and these 3 birds were dominant species in inland areas and also considered as resident species except for black vulture. Also, there was a difference among 5 different habitat types. Black vultures were most found in estuaries whereas common buzzard and common kestrel could be found in coastal areas. Presumably raptors prefer reservoirs and estuaries probably due to lower human disturbance in these areas, and management efforts should be concentrated in inland areas for black vulture and coastal areas for common kestrel and common buzzard.

keywords
black vulture, conservation, landscape, Whitaker’s measure, wintering raptors

참고문헌

1.

Bustamante J, Seoane J. 2004. Predicting the distribution of four species of raptors (Aves: Accipitridae) in southern Spain: statistical models work better than existing maps. J Biogeogr 31: 295-306.

2.

Kim B, Choi K, Kim C, Lee UH, Kim YH. 2000. Effects of the summer monsoon on the distribution and loading of organic carbon in a deep reservoir, lake Soyang, Korea. Water Res 34: 3495-3504.

3.

Kim JH, Yoo BH, Won C, Park JY, Yi JY. 2003. An agricultural habitat indicator for wildlife. In: Agriculture and Biodiversity: Developing Indicators for Policy Analysis; Proceedings from an OECD Expert Meeting, Zurich, Switzeland, November 2001. OECD Publishing, pp 94-104.

4.

Legendre P, Dale MRT, Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J, Hohn M, Myers D. 2002. The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25: 601-615.

5.

Moores N, Kim A, Park MN, Kim SA. 2010. The anticipated impacts of the four rivers project (Republic of Korea) on waterbirds. Birds Korea Preliminary Report. Birds Korea.

6.

NIER 2007. Contemporary census of wintering bird Korea. NIER, Inchoen.

7.

Palomino D, Carrascal LM. 2007. Habitat associations of araptor community in a mosaic landscape of central Spainunder urban development. Landsc Urban Plan 83: 268-274.

8.

Sanchez-Zapata JA, Carrete M, Graviliov A, Sklyarenko S, Ceballos O, Donazar AJ, Hiraldo F. 2003. Land use changes and raptor conservation in steppe habitats of eastern Kazakhstan. Biol Conserv 111: 71-77.

9.

Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L. 2005. Conservation:top predators and biodiversity. Nature 436: 192.

10.

Simberloff D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era?. Biol Conserv 83: 247-258.

11.

Thiollay JM, Rahman Z. 2002. The raptor community of central Sulawesi: habitat selection and conservation status. Biol Conserv 107: 111-122.

12.

Van Dyke F. 2008. Conservation biology: foundations, con- cepts, applications. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Springer.

13.

Zelenak JR, Rotella JJ. 1997. Nest success and productivity of Ferruginous hawks in northern Montana. Can J Zool 75: 1035-1041.

Journal of Ecology and Environment