바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

The effect of water turnover time on decomposition of wild rice (Zizania latifolia) and nutrient dynamics in an artificial wetland system

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2014, v.37 no.1, pp.13-19
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2014.002
이보은 (서울대학교)
김재근 (서울대학교)

Abstract

The effect of different turnover time of water on the decomposition of emergent macrophyte litter (Zizania latifoliaGriseb.) was investigated using a microcosm experiment. Microcosm treatment represented different turnover time ofwater; 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks. The litterbags from each treatment were retrieved every 2 weeks until the 8th week and thewater simultaneously sampled with the litterbag. The dry weight and the content of major cations in the litter, and thecontent of available N, P, and major cations in the water were analyzed. Dry weight loss after 8 weeks indicated the lowerdecay rates under the condition of short turnover time of water. Major cations from the litter and the water showed thatthe leached amounts of K and Mg from the litter were highest in the 2nd week and dramatically decreased from the 4thweek. The dynamics of available nitrogen and phosphorus in the water showed that as the water turnover time was gettinglonger, the amounts of available nitrogen and phosphorus remained higher. These results suggest that wetlands withlonger turnover time of water could maintain the increased nitrogen and phosphorus and no outflow of the nutrientscould cause eutrophication problem.

keywords
closed system, decay rate, eutrophication, hydrological regime

참고문헌

1.

Aber JD, Melillo JM. 1980. Litter decomposition: measuring relative contributions of organic matter and nitrogen to forest soils. Can J Bot 58: 416-421.

2.

Andersen DC, Nelson SM, Binkley D. 2003. Flood flows, leaf breakdown, and plant-available nitrogen on a dryland river floodplain. Wetlands 23: 180-189.

3.

Boyle J. 2004. A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic matter content of sediments. J Paleolimnol 31: 125-127.

4.

Carpenter SR. 1980. Enrichment of Lake Wingra, Wisconsin, by submersed macrophyte decay. Ecology 61: 1145-1155.

5.

Davis CB, van der Valk AG. 1978. The decomposition of standing and fallen litter of Typha glauca and Scirpus fluviatilis. Can J Bot 56: 662-675.

6.

Day FP Jr. 1983. Effects of flooding on leaf litter decomposition in microcosms. Oecologia 56: 180-184.

7.

Dean WE Jr. 1974. Determination of carbonates and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. J Sediment Petrol 44: 242–248.

8.

Gessner MO. 2000. Breakdown and nutrient dynamics of submerged Phragmites shoots in the littoral zone of a temperate hardwater lake. Aquat Bot 66: 9-20.

9.

Glazebrook HS, Robertson AI. 1999. The effect of flooding and flood timing on leaf litter breakdown rates and nutrient dynamics in a river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) forest. Aust J Ecol 24: 625-635.

10.

Heffernan JB, Sponseller RA. 2004. Nutrient mobilization and processing in Sonoran desert riparian soils following artificial re-wetting. Biogeochemistry 70: 117-134.

11.

Hobbie SE, Vitousek PM. 2000. Nutrient limitation of decomposition in Hawaiian forests. Ecology 81: 1867-1877.

12.

Hodson RE, Christian RR, Maccubbin AE. 1984. Lignocellulose and lignin in the salt marsh grass Spartina alterniflora: initial concentrations and short-term, post-depositional changes in detrital matter. Mar Biol 81: 1-7.

13.

Howard PJA, Howard DM. 1974. Microbial decomposition of tree and shrub leaf litter, 1: Weight loss and chemical composition of decomposing litter. Oikos 25: 341-352.

14.

Kim JG. 2001. Decomposition of Carex and Nuphar plants in a subalpine marsh. J Plant Biol 44: 73-80.

15.

Kim JG. 2005. Nutrient dynamics in montane wetlands, emphasizing the relationship between cellulose decomposition and water chemistry. J Korean Wetl Soc 7: 33-42.

16.

Kim JG, Chang NK. 1989. Litter production and decomposition in the Pinus rigida plantation in Mt. Kwan-ak. Korean J Ecol 12: 9-20. (in Korean with English abstract)

17.

Kim JG, Park JH, Choi BJ, Shim JH, Kwon GJ, Lee BA, Lee YW, Ju EJ. 2004. Method in Ecology. Bomundang, Seoul. (in Korean)

18.

Kim S, Kim JG. 2009. Humulus japonicus accelerates the dephorus composition of Miscanthus sacchariflorus and Phragmites australis in a floodplain. J Plant Biol 52: 466-474.

19.

Kirchmann H, Witter E. 1989. Ammonia volatilization during aerobic and anaerobic manure decomposition. Plant Soil 115: 35-41.

20.

Kirschbaum MUF. 1995. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol Biochem 27: 753-760.

21.

Langhans SD, Tockner K. 2006. The role of timing, duration, and frequency of inundation in controlling leaf litter decomposition in a river-floodplain ecosystem (Tagliamento, northeastern Italy). Oecologia 147: 501-509.

22.

Molles MC Jr, Crawford CS, Ellis LM. 1995. Effects of an experimental flood on litter dynamics in the middle Rio Grande riparian ecosystem. Reg Riv Res Manage 11:275-281.

23.

Mun HT, Namgung J, Kim JH. 2001. Decay rate and changes of nutrients during the decomposition of Zizania latifolia. Korean J Ecol 24: 81-85.

24.

Neckles HA, Neill C. 1994. Hydrologic control of litter decomposition in seasonally flooded prairie marshes. Hydrobiologia 286: 155-165.

25.

O’Connell AM. 1990. Microbial decomposition (respiration) of litter in eucalypt forests of south-western Australia: an empirical model based on laboratory incubations. Soil Biol Biochem 22: 153-160.

26.

Okuda S. 1978. Plant sociological studies on the vegetation of the alluvial plains in the Kanto district, central Japan. Bull Inst Environ Sci Tech Yokohama Natl Univ 4: 43-112.

27.

Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322-331.

28.

Robertson AI, Bacon P, Heagney G. 2001. The responses of floodplain primary production to flood frequency and timing. J Appl Ecol 38: 126-136.

29.

Rosemond, AD, Pringle CM, Ramirez A, Paul MJ, Meyer JL. 2002. Landscape variation in phosphorus concentration and effects on detritus-based tropical streams. Limnol Oceanogr 47: 278-289.

30.

Shim KC, Lee SK, Lee JE, Chang NK. 1992. Study of initial decomposition of the litters of Platanus orientalis in stream ecosystem. Korean J Ecol 15: 387-394.

31.

Suberkropp K, Chauvet E. 1995. Regulation of leaf breakdown by fungi in streams: influences of water chemistry. Ecology 76: 1433-1445.

32.

Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Studies in Ecology, Vol. 5. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

33.

Tiegs SD, O’Leary JF, Pohl MM, Munill CL. 2005. Flood disturbance and riparian species diversity on the Colorado River Delta. Biodivers Conserv 14: 1175-1194.

34.

Tockner K, Malard F, Ward JV. 2000. An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrol Process 14: 2861-2883.

35.

Wetzel RG, Howe MJ. 1999. High production in a herbaceous perennial plant achieved by continuous growth and synchronized population dynamics. Aquat Bot 64: 111-129.

Journal of Ecology and Environment