바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Characteristics of Soil Respiration in Pinus densiflora Stand Undergoing Secondary Succession by Fire-induced Forest Disturbance.

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2014, v.37 no.3, pp.113-122
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2014.014

Keum-Chul Yang (Kongju National University)



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare soil CO2 efflux between burned site and unburned site dominated by Pinus densiflora forest in the Samcheok area of the East Coast fire in 2000 and measure soil CO2 efflux and environmental factors between April 2011 to March 2012. Soil CO2 efflux was measured with LI-6400 once a month, and the 10cm depth soil temperature, air temperature, and soil moisture contents were measured in continuum with Data Loggers. Soil CO2 efflux showed the maximum value in August as 417.8 mg CO2•m-2•h-1 (burned site) and 1175.1 mg CO2•m-2•h-1 (unburned site), while it showed the minimum value as 41.4 mg CO2•m-2•h-1 (burned site) in December and 42.7 mg CO2•m-2•h-1 (unburned site) in February. The result showed the high correlation between soil CO2 efflux and the seasonal changes in temperature. More specifically, soil temperature showed higher correlation with soil CO2 efflux in burned site (R2 = 0.932, P < 0.001) and unburned site (R2 = 0.942, P < 0.001) than the air temperature in burned site (R2 = 0.668, P < 0.01) and unburned site(R2 = 0.729, P < 0.001). Q10 values showed higher sensitivity in unburned site (4.572) than in burned site (2.408). The total soil CO2 efflux was obtained with the exponential function between soil CO2 efflux and soil temperature during the research period, and it showed 2.5 times higher in unburned site (35.59 ton CO2•ha-2•yr-1) than burned site (14.69 ton CO2•ha-2•yr-1).

keywords
CO2 efflux, Soil temperature, LI-6400, Q10 value, soil temperature

Reference

1.

Anderson JPE. 1982. Soil respiration. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological properties (Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, eds). American Society of Agronomy, Medison, WI, pp 831-871.

2.

Bond WJ, van Wilgen BW. 1996. Fire and Plants. Chapman & Hall, London.

3.

Certini G. 2005. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143: 1-10.

4.

Chae NY, Kim J, Kim DG, Lee DW, Kim RH, Ban JY, Son YH. 2003. Measurement of soil CO2 efflux using a closed dynamic chamber system. Kor J Agr Forest Meteorol 5: 94-100.

5.

Chandler C, Cheney P, Thomas P, Trabaud L, Williams D. 1983. Fire in Forestry, Vol. I: Forest Fire Behavior and Effects. Wiley, New York, NY.

6.

Choung Y, Lee BC, Cho JH, Lee KS, Jang IS, Kim SH, Hong SK, Jung HC, Choung HL. 2004. Forest responses to the large-scale east coast fires in Korea. Ecol Res 19: 43-54.

7.

DeBano LF. 1991. The effect of fire on soil properties - Proceedings-management and productivity of western montane forest soil. In: Proceedings of Management and Productivity of Western-Montane Forest Soils, Boise, ID, April 10-12, pp 151-156.

8.

Fang C, Moncrieff JB. 2001. The dependence of soil CO2efflux on temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 33: 155-165.

9.

Gough CM, Seiler JR. 2004. The influence environmental, soil carbon, root, and stand characteristics on soil CO2 efflux in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations located on the South Carolina coastal plain. For Ecol Manage 191: 353-363.

10.

Jassal RS, Black TA. 2006. Estimating heterotrophic and autotrophic soil respiration using small-area trenched plot technique: theory and practice. Agr Forest Meteorol 140: 193-202.

11.

Jeong MJ. 2007. Soil respiration and soil microbial activity after fire in a Pinus densiflora stand. MS Thesis. Kangwon University, Chuncheon, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)

12.

Joo SJ, Park MS, Kim GS, Lee CS. 2011. CO2 flux in a cooltemperate deciduous forest (Quercus mongolica) of Mt. Nam in Seoul, Korea. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 95-106.

13.

Kim C. 2006. Soil carbon cycling and soil CO2 efflux in a Red Pine(Pinus densiflora)stand. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 23-27.

14.

Kim SB. 2008. Soil CO2 efflux and leaf-litter decomposition in Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis stand. MS Thesis. Chonnam University, Gwangju, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)

15.

Knapp AK, Conard SL, Blair JL. 1998. Determinants of soil CO2 flux from a sub–humid grassland: effect of fire and fire history. Ecol Appl 8: 760-770.

16.

Korea Meteorological Administration. 2011. Weather Resources Database. http://www.kma.go.kr/. Accessed from March 2011 to February 2012.

17.

Kutiel P, Shaviv A. 1992. Effects of soil type, plant composition and leaching on soil nutrients following a simulated forest fire. For Ecol Manage 53: 329–343.

18.

Landsberg JJ, Gower ST. 1997. Application of Physiological Ecology to Forest Management. Academic Press, New York, NY.

19.

Lee JS. 2011. Monitoring soil respiration using an automatic operating chamber in a Gwangneung temperate deciduous forest. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 411-423.

20.

Lee KS. 1995. Mechanisms of vegetation succession on abandoned fields after shifting cultivation in Chinbu, Kangwon-Do. PhD Dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

21.

Lee WK, Choi K, Oh MY. 1988. Effect of forest fire on soil properties and vegetation. Res Rep For Res Kor 37: 35-49. (in Korean with English summary)

22.

Lee YY, Mun HT. 2001. A study on the soil respiration in a Quercus acutissima forest. Korean J Ecol 24: 141-147. (in Korean with English abstract)

23.

McHale PJ, Mitchell MJ, Bowles FP. 1998. Soil warming in a northern hardwood forest: trace gas fluxes and leaf litter decomposition. Can J For Res 28: 1365-1372.

24.

Moon HS. 2004. Soil respiration on Pinus densiflora, Quercus variabilis and Platycarya strobilacea stands in Jinju, Gyeongnam Province. Korean J Ecol 27: 87-92. (in Korean)

25.

Mun HT, Choung YS. 1996. Effects of forest fire on soil nutrients in pine forests in Kosong, Kangwon Province. Korean J Ecol 19: 375-383. (in Korean with English abstract)

26.

Noh NJ, Son YH, Lee SK, Jo WY, Lee NY, Bae SW, Kim HS. 2010. Diurnal pattern of soil CO2 efflux in a Pinus densiflora forest measured using an open–flow chamber system. Forest Sci Technol 6: 41-45.

27.

Raich JW, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1989. Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 49: 471-483.

28.

Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B 44: 81-99.

29.

Singh JS, Gupta SR. 1977. Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot Rev 43: 449-528.

30.

Son YH, Kim HW. 1996. Soil respiration in Pinus rigida and Larix leptolepis plantation. J Korean For Soc 85: 496-505. (in Korean with English abstract)

31.

Witkamp M. 1966. Rates of carbon dioxide evolution from the forest floor. Ecology 47: 492-494.

32.

Woo BM, Kwon TH, Ma HS, Lee HH, Lee JH. 1985. Effects of forest fire in the forest vegetation and soil (II). Jour Korean For Soc 68: 37-45. (in Korean with English abstract)

33.

Woo BM, Lee HH. 1989. Effects of forest fire in the forest vegetation and soil (IV). Jour Korean For Soc 78: 302-313.

34.

Yi MJ. 2003. Soil CO2 evolution in Quercus variabilis and Q. mongolica forests in Chunchon, Kangwon Province. J Korean For Soc 92: 263-269.

Journal of Ecology and Environment