바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Assessment of water quality variations under non-rainy and rainy conditions by principal component analysis techniques in Lake Doam watershed, Korea

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2015, v.38 no.2, pp.145-156
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.016

Bal Dev Bhattrai (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok 245-711, Korea)
Sungjin Kwak (Department of Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok 245-711, Korea)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study was based on water quality data of the Lake Doam watershed, monitored from 2010 to 2013 at eight different sites with multiple physiochemical parameters. The dataset was divided into two sub-datasets, namely, non-rainy and rainy. Principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA) techniques were applied to evaluate seasonal correla¬tions of water quality parameters and extract the most significant parameters influencing stream water quality. The first five principal components identified by PCA techniques explained greater than 80% of the total variance for both data¬sets. PCA and FA results indicated that total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, total phosphorus, and dissolved inorganic phos¬phorus were the most significant parameters under the non-rainy condition. This indicates that organic and inorganic pollutants loads in the streams can be related to discharges from point sources (domestic discharges) and non-point sources (agriculture, forest) of pollution. During the rainy period, turbidity, suspended solids, nitrate nitrogen, and dis¬solved inorganic phosphorus were identified as the most significant parameters. Physical parameters, suspended solids, and turbidity, are related to soil erosion and runoff from the basin. Organic and inorganic pollutants during the rainy period can be linked to decayed matters, manure, and inorganic fertilizers used in farming. Thus, the results of this study suggest that principal component analysis techniques are useful for analysis and interpretation of data and identification of pollution factors, which are valuable for understanding seasonal variations in water quality for effective management

keywords
factor analysis, Lake Doam watershed, principal component analysis

Reference

1.

Alberto WD, Del Pilar DM, Valeria AM, Fabiana PS, Cecilia HA, De Los Angeles BM. 2001. Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study: Suquia river basin (Cordoba–Argentina). Water Res 35: 2881-2894.

2.

American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, D.C., American Public Health Association.

3.

Cao Y, Williams DD, Williams NE. 1999. Data transformation and standardization in the multivariate analysis of river water quality. Ecol Appl 9: 669-677.

4.

Cho JH. 2001. The impact of hydroelectric power plant discharge on the water quality of the Namde River. Environ Eng Res 6: 123-130.

5.

Choi JW, Shin DS, Lim KJ, Lee SS, Kang MJ. 2012. Estimation suspended solids concentration of the Doam Reservoir under dry and wet weather conditions. Kor J Environ Agric 31: 113-121.

6.

Dixon W, Chiswell B. 1996. Review of aquatic monitoring program design. Water Res 30: 1935-1948.

7.

Gazzaz NM, Yusoff MK, Ramli MF, Aris AZ, Juahir H. 2012. Characterization of spatial patterns in river water quality using chemometric pattern recognition techniques. Mar Poll Bull 64: 688-698.

8.

Heo SG, Kim JY, Yoo DS, Kim KS, Ahn JH, Yoon JS, Lim KJ. 2007. Simulation of hydrological and sediment behaviors in the Doam-dam watershed considering soil properties of the soil reconditioned agricultural fields. J Korean Soc Agr Eng 49: 49-60.

9.

Heo SG, Kim KS, Ahn JH, Yoon JS, Lim KJ, Choi JD, Shin YC, Lyou CW. 2006. Evaluation of water quality impacts of forest fragmentation at Doam-Dam watershed using GIS-based modeling system. J Kor Assoc Geo Info Stud 9: 81-94.

10.

Heo WM, Kim BC, Kim YH, Choi KS. 1998. Storm runoff of phosphorus from nonpoint sources into Lake Soyang and transportation of turbid watermass within the lake. Kor J Limnol 31: 1-8.

11.

Heo WY. 2012. Characteristics of non-point pollution discharge on stormwater runoff from Lake Doam watershed. Kor J Ecol Environ 45: 62-71.

12.

Huang F, Wang X, Lou L, Zhou Z, Wu J. 2010. Spatial variation and source apportionment of water pollution in Qiantang River (China) using statistical techniques. Water Res 44: 1562-1572.

13.

Institute of Environmental Research. 1999. Standard method for examination of water and wastewater. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Republic of Korea.

14.

Jung SM, Jang CW, Kim JK, Kim BC. 2009. Characteristics of water quality by storm runoffs from intensive highland agriculture area in the upstream of Han River basin. J Kor Soc Water Qual 25: 102-111.

15.

Kim JK, Shin MS, Jang CW, Jung SM, Kim BC. 2007. Comparison of TOC and DOC distribution and the oxidation efficiency of BOD and COD in several reservoirs and rivers in the Han River system. J Kor Soc Water Qual 23: 72-80.

16.

Kwak SJ, Bhattrai BD, Lee CK, Heo WM. 2013. Long-term trends of summer season of water quality in Lake Doam. Kor J Ecol Environ 46: 128-134.

17.

Olsen RL, Chappell RW, Loftis JC. 2012. Water quality sample collection, data treatment and results presentation for principal components analysis-literature review and Illinois River watershed case study. Water Res 46: 3110-3122.

18.

Ouyang Y, Nkedi-Kizza P, Wu QT, Shinde D, Huang CH. 2006. Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality. Water Res 40: 3800-3810.

19.

Palma P, Ledo L, Soares S, Barbosa IR, Alvarenga P. 2014. Spatial and temporal variability of the water and sediments quality in the Alqueva reservoir (Guadiana Basin; southern Portugal). Sci Tot Environ 470-471: 780–790.

20.

Park KH, Kim BS, Yun HJ, Ryu KY, Yun JC, Choi JY, Kim KD, Jin YI. 2012. Characteristics of water quality at main streams and Lake Doam in Daegwallyeong area. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 45: 882-889.

21.

Park SC, Oh CR, Jin YH, Kim DS. 2005. Study on runoff characteristics of non-point source in rural area of Seomjin watershed. J Environ Sci 14: 1057-1062.

22.

Petersen W, Bertino L, Callies U, Zorita E. 2001. Process identification by principal component analysis of river water-quality data. Ecol Model 138: 193-213.

23.

Razmkhah H, Abrishamchi A, Torkian A. 2010. Evaluation of spatial and temporal variation in water quality by pattern recognition techniques: a case study on Jajrood River (Tehran, Iran). J Env Manag 91: 852-860.

24.

Shin YK. 2004. Comparison of water quality between forested and agricultural subcatchments in Daegwallyong area. J Korean Assoc Geogr Stud 39: 544-561.

25.

Shrestha S, Kazama F. 2007. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ Model Softw 22: 464-475.

26.

Simeonov V, Stratis JA, Samara C, Zachariadis G, Voutsa D, Anthemidis A, Sofoniou M, Kouimtzi TH. 2003. Assessment of the surface water quality in Northern Greece. Water Res 37: 4119-4124.

27.

Singh KP, Malik A, Sinha S. 2005. Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti river (India) using multivariate statistical techniques-a case study. Analytica Chimica Acta 538: 355-374.

28.

Thurston GD, Spengler JD. 1985. A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in metropolitan Boston. Atmosph Environ 19: 9-25.

29.

Varol M, Gökot B, Bekleyen A, Sen B. 2012. Spatial and temporal variations in surface water quality of the dam reservoirs in the Tigris River basin, Turkey. Catena 92: 11-21.

30.

Wonju Regional Environmental Office. 2011. Doam dam non-point pollution source management, area monitoring and evaluation program. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea; 11-1480358-000051-01.

Journal of Ecology and Environment