바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.43 No.2

Citation Share

Differences in functional traits of leaf blade and culm of common reed in four habitat types

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2019, v.43 no.2, pp.98-103
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0113-8



& (2019). Differences in functional traits of leaf blade and culm of common reed in four habitat types. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 43(2), 98-103, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0113-8

Abstract

We compared the functional traits of leaf blades and culms of common reed (Phragmites australis) in four habitat types of distinguished environments such as temperature, precipitation, water characteristics, and indices related to biomass production (montane fen, MF; riparian marsh, RM; lagoon, LG; and salt marsh, SM). We also examined the relationships between the functional traits within and among populations. Four populations showed remarkable differences in the functional traits of leaf blades and culms. MF and RM had relatively tall (> 300 cm) and thick (> 8 mm) culms bearing long leaf blades (> 40 cm), whereas LG and SM had relatively shorter and thinner culms bearing shorter leaf blades than MF and RM. Some relationships between the functional traits of leaf blades and culms showed negative or not significant correlations within the population, whereas most of the relationships between the functional traits showed positive correlations particularly when all the data from four populations was included into the correlation analysis.

keywords
Lagoon, Montane fen, Phragmites australis, Riparian marsh, Salt marsh

Reference

1.

Asaeda T, Karunaratne S. Dynamic modeling of the growth of Phragmites australis: model description. Aquat Bot. 2006;7(4):301–18.

2.

Coops H, van der Velde G. Effects of waves on helophyte stands: mechanical characteristics of stems of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris. Aquat Bot. 1996;53:175–85.

3.

Engloner AI. Structure, growth dynamics and biomass of reed (Phragmites australis)-a review. Flora. 2009;204:331–46.

4.

Gessener MO. Breakdown and nutrient dynamics of submerged Phragmites shoots in the littoral zone of a temperate hardwater lake. Aquat Bot. 2000; 66(1):9–20.

5.

Hanganu J, Mihail G, Coops H. Responses of ecotypes of Phragmites australis to increased seawater influence: a field study in the Danube Delta, Romania. Aquat Bot. 1999;64(3–4):351–8.

6.

Haslam SM. The development of the annual population in Phragmites communis Trin. Ann Bot. 1969;34:571–91.

7.

Hong MG, Heo YJ, Kim JG. The construction and management of artificial wetland using emergent macrophytes for high biomass production. J Wetl Res. 2014a;16(1):61–72.

8.

Hong MG, Kim JG. Growth characteristics of cutting culms sectioned at different positions from three reed populations. J Korean Soc Environ Restor Techno. 2012;15(1):53–62.

9.

Hong MG, Kim JG. Cutting efficiency using Phragmites australis culms according to content and timing of indole-acetic acid treatment. J Wetl Res. 2013;15(1): 35–41.

10.

Hong M-G, Kim JG. Comparative analysis of cutting efficiency using culms of reed with genetic, environmental and methodological differences. J Korean Wetl Soc. 2011;13(3):603–11.

11.

Hong MG, Nam BE, Kim JG. Vegetation and water characteristics of floating mat in a coastal lagoon as the habitat for endangered plant species. J Ecol Environ. 2018;42:28.

12.

Hong MG, Son CY, Kim JG. Effects of interspecific competition on the growth and competitiveness of five emergent macrophytes in a constructed lentic wetland. Paddy Water Environ. 2014b;12(Supp.1):S193–202.

13.

Kim HT, Lee GM, Kim JG. The ecological characteristics and conservation counterplan of Menyanthes trifoliata habitat in floating mat in Korean east coastal lagoon, Sunyoodam. J Wetl Res. 2013;15(1):25–34.

14.

Köbbing JF, Thevs N, Zerbe S. The utilisation of reed (Phragmites australis): a review. Mires Peat. 2013;13(1):1–14.

15.

Lee H-J, Yang H-S. Adaptation of Phragmites communis Trin. Population to soil salt contents of habitats. Korean J Ecol. 1993;16(1):63–74.

16.

Mook JH, van der Toorn J. The influence of environmental factors and management on stands of Phragmites australis. II. Effects on yield and its relationships with shoot density. J Appl Ecol. 1982;19(2):501–17.

17.

Nam BE, Hong MG, Park HJ, Kim JG. Soil factors determining the distribution of Phragmites australis and Phacelurus latifolius in upper tidal zone. J Ecol Environ. 2018a;42:25.

18.

Nam BE, Kim JG, Hong MG. Vegetation and water characteristics of an ecotechnological water purifying biotope in Yongin. J Wetl Res. 2018b;20(4):432–45.

19.

Park HJ, Nam BE, Hong MG, Kim JG. Slope and soil nutrients can explain the distribution of Phragmites australis and Phragmites japonica in riparian wetlands. River Res Applic. 2018;34(9):1229–33.

20.

Park J, Hong MG, Kim JG. Relationship between early development of plant community and environmental condition in abandoned paddy terraces at mountainous valleys in Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2013;36(2):131–40.

21.

Park JH, Kim JG. Ecological characteristics of Sphagnum fens in Mt. Odae: 2. Conservation area of Jilmoe-neup. J Wetl Res. 2012;14(1):101–20.

22.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.

23.

Ritterbusch D. Growth patterns of reed (Phragmites australis): the development of reed stands in carp ponds. Aquacult Int. 2007;15:191–9.

24.

van Ryckegem G, van Driessche G, van Beecumen JJ, Verbeken A. The estimated impact of fungi on nutrient dynamics during decomposition of Phragmites australis leaf sheaths and stems. Microb Ecol. 2006;52:564–74.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy