바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The Effect of Cognitive Load and Emotional Arousal on Liar’s Gaze Aversion Behavior

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of cognitive load and emotional arousal on liar’s gaze aversion. 112 participants were randomly assigned to four liar groups according to cognitive load and emotional arousal conditions (high cognition - high emotion: n = 29, high cognition - low emotion: n = 27, low cognition - high emotion: n = 29, low cognition - low emotion: n = 28). All participants were interviewed after lie tasks was performed, and gaze aversion was measured using a wearable eye-tracker. The high cognitive load condition had a significant higher gaze aversion than the low cognitive condition. There was no difference in gaze aversion among emotional arousal conditions. The interaction of cognitive load and emotional arousal was significant. In high cognitive load conditions, gaze aversion appeared with high frequency regardless of emotional arousal. In low cognitive load and high emotional arousal condition, gaze aversion appeared with low frequency. Therefore, this study suggests that it is necessary to consider the effects of cognitive load and emotional arousal levels on the liar‘s gaze aversion behavior.

keywords
거짓말 탐지, 시선회피, 웨어러블 아이트래커, 인지적 부하, 정서적 각성, lie detection, gaze aversion, wearable eye-tracker, cognitive load, emotional arousal

Reference

1.

Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214-234.

2.

DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74-119.

3.

Dimberg, U., Andréasson, P., & Thunberg, M. (2011). Emotional empathy and facial reactions to facial expressions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 26-31.

4.

Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 727-733.

5.

Donkelaar, P., Saaverdra, S., & Woollacott, M. (2007). Multiple saccades are more automatic than single saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3148-3151.

6.

Duncan, S., & Barrett, L. F. (2007). Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 21(6), 1184-1211.

7.

Ekman, P. (2009). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

8.

Ekman, P., Ellsworth, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2013). Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings. New York, NY: Elsevier.

9.

Gilbert, J. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(6), 723-739.

10.

Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1), 60-74.

11.

Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., & Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computer in Human Behavior, 25, 325-331.

12.

Gombos, V. A. (2006). The cognition of deception:The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(3), 197-214.

13.

Kim, J. T., & Shin, D. K. (1978). A study of based on the standardization of the STAI for Korea. The New Medical Journal, 21(1), 69-75.

14.

Kim, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Development and validation of the manipulativeness scale. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 12(1), 1339-1349.

15.

Klein, S. N., Verschuere, B., Kindt, M., Meijer, E., Nahari, T., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2017). Memory detection: The effects of emotional stimuli. Biological Psychology, 129, 25-35.

16.

Lee, H. S., Kim, J. H., Oh, Y. R., & Lee, J. H. (2015). The emotional arousal and cognitive load cues in liar’s nonverbal behavior. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 29(4), 85-101.

17.

Lim, E. J. (2010). Trend in the affective states and behaviors of shame and guilt according to attribution styles among children. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Catholic University, Korea.

18.

Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 365-376.

19.

Mann, S., Vrij, A., Nasholm, E., Warmelink, L., Leal, S., & Forrester, D. (2012). The direction of deception: Neuro-linguistic programming as a lie detection tool. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(2), 160-166.

20.

Marschall, D., Sanfter, J., & Tangney, J. P. (1994). The state shame and guilt scale. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

21.

Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., Gamer, M., Merckelbach, H., & Ben‐Shakhar, G. (2016). Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. Psychophysiology, 53(5), 593-604.

22.

Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., & Shackman, A. J. (2015). The neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions: Fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 58-72.

23.

Osugi, A., & Ohira, H. (2017). High emotional arousal enables subliminal detection of concealed information. Psychology, 8(10), 1482-1500.

24.

Ponkanen, L. M., Peltola, M. J., & Hietanen, J. K. (2011). The observer observed: Frontal EEG asymmetry and autonomic responses differentiate between another person’s direct and averted gaze when the face is seen live. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82(2), 180-187.

25.

Reeve, J. (2014). Understanding motivation and emotion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

26.

Scherer, K. R., & Ekman, P. (2014). Approaches to emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

27.

Spielberger, C. D. (1970). STAI manual for a state-trait anxiety inventory. California:Consulting Psychologist Press.

28.

Sporer, S. L. (2016). Deception and cognitive load:Expanding our horizon with a working memory model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 420-432.

29.

Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., Van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), 428-453.

30.

Taylor, R., & Hick, R. F. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self‐generated trivial and serious situations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(2), 321-331.

31.

Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Mann, S. (2010). Good liars. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38, 77-98.

32.

Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 28-32.

33.

Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89-121.

34.

Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2017). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 1-21.

35.

Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2008). A cognitive load approach to lie detection. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5(1), 39-43.

36.

Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B., & Harris, L. L. (2012). Lie detection by inducing cognitive load: Eye-movements and other cues to the false answers of “witnesses” to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 887-909.

37.

Walczyk, J. J., Igou, F. D., Dixon, L. P., & Tcholakian, T. (2013). Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 14-27.

38.

Whelan, C., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2014). High-stake lies: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception in public appeals for help with missing or murdered relatives. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(4), 523-537.

logo