바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Punitiveness Toward Defendants Accused of Same-Race Crimes Revisited: Replication in a Different Culture

Abstract

Lee, Khogali, Despodova, and Penrod (2019) demonstrated that American participants whose races are different from a defendant and a victim rendered more punitive judgments against the defendant in a same-race crime (e.g., White observer-Black defendant-Black victim) compared to a cross-race crime (e.g., White observer-Black defendant-Hispanic victim). The aim of the current study was to test the replicability of their findings in a different country-South Korea. Study 1a failed to replicate the race-combination effect in South Korea with three new moderators-case strength, defendant’s use of violence, and race salience. Study 1b was conducted with the same design of Study 1a in the United States to examine whether the failure of the replication in Study 1a was due to cultural differences between South Korea and the United States. However, Study 1b also failed to replicate the race-combination effect. Study 2 conducted a meta-analytic review of the data from Lee et al.’s (2019) study, along with the data from Study 1a and 1b and revealed that the race-salience manipulation in Study 1a and 1b might have caused the null results. We conclude that when people’ races are different from both a defendant and a victim, they are likely to render more punitive judgments against the defendant in a same-race crime than a cross-race crime. However, the race-combination effect is only sustained when race-relevant issues are not salient in the crime.

keywords
인종편향, 범죄사건 판단, 인종 특출성, racial bias, judgment in criminal cases, race salience

Reference

1.

Adams, L. T., Bryden, M. W., & Griffith, J. D. (2011). Middle Eastern racial bias and the impact of jury deliberation. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 29, 41-59.

2.

Bresnahan, M. J., Levine, T. R., Shearman, S. M., Lee, S. Y., Park, C. Y., & Kiyomiya, T. (2005). A Multimethod Multitrait Validity Assessment of Self-Construal in Japan, Korea, and the United States. Human Communication Research, 31, 33-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00864.x.

3.

Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Culture and Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, 38, 71-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0

4.

ForsterLee, R., ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & King, E. (2006). The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 179-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.675

5.

Gau, J. M. (2016). A jury of whose peers? The impact of selection procedures on racial composition and the prevalence of majority white juries. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2015.1087149.

6.

Herzog, S. (2003). Does the ethnicity of offenders in crime scenarios affect public perceptions of crime seriousness? A randomized survey experiment in Israel. Social Forces, 82, 757-781. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0011

7.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

8.

Hymes, R. W., Leinart, M., Rowe, S., & Rogers, W. (1993). Acquaintance rape: The effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 627-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224 545.1993.97139 17.

9.

Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.778.

10.

Judd, C. M., Ryan, C. S., & Park, B. (1991). Accuracy in the judgment of in-group and out-group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.366.

11.

Korean Statistical Information Service. (2016). International Migration Statistics. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/eng/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ETITLE&parentId=A

12.

Lee, J., Khogali, M., Despodova, N. M., & Penrod, S. (2019). A third party’s judgment in same-race and cross-race crimes. Race and Social Problems, 11, 253 - 267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-019-09266-z

13.

Ma, Correll, & Wittenbrink (2015). The Chicago Face Database: A Free Stimulus Set of Faces and Norming Data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122-1135.

14.

Margan, R. E. (2017, October). Race and Hispanic origin of victims and offenders, 2012-15 (NCJ Publication No. 250747). Retrieved from Bureau of Justice Statistics: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rhovo1215.pdf

15.

Marques, J. M. (1990). The black sheep effect: Outgroup homogeneity as a social comparison process. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 131-151). Nova Iorque: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

16.

Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependent between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 90, 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0031564

17.

Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: a meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9

18.

Morling, B., & Lamoreaux, M. (2008). Measuring Culture Outside the Head: A Meta-Analysis of Individualism-Collectivism in Cultural Products. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 199-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868308318260

19.

Pearson, J. M., Law, J. R., Skene, J., Beskind, D. H., Vidmar, N., Ball, D. A., Malekpour, A., Carter, R. M., & Skene, J. H. (2018). Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 856-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0451-z

20.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Communication and Persuasion, (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Springer New York doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1

21.

Quattrone, G. A., & Jones, E. E. (1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.141.

22.

Rector, N. A., & Bagby, R. M. (1995). Criminal sentence recommendations in a simulated rape trial: Examining juror prejudice in Canada. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13, 113-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370130108

23.

Saucier, D. A., Hockett, J. M., Zanotti, D. C., & Heffel, S. (2010). Effects of racism on perceptions and punishment of intra-and interracial crimes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1767-1784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260509358386

24.

Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367-1379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263005

25.

Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2009). “Race salience” in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 599-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.877

26.

Stevenson, M. C., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009), Race Shapes Perceptions of Juvenile Offenders in Criminal Court1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1660-1689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00499.x

27.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.

28.

Wuensch, K. L., Campbell, M. W., Kesler, F. C., & Moore, C. H. (2002). Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 587-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603920

logo