바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Comprehension of「Crime Victims’ Rights Guide」: Focused on Before and After the 2019 Revision

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the current victims' rights guide, which was revised during 2019, with former victims' rights guide to determine whether the current guide improved the comprehension of victims' rights among lay people. In addition, we examined the effect of the level of education and perceived stress on the comprehension of the victims' rights. A total of 289 participants were asked to answer a series of questions to examine their comprehension level of the victim's rights and to measure their level of education and perceived stress level. The results showed that the objective comprehension level the current guide condition was higher than the former one, but no difference was found with the subjective comprehension level. The interaction effect between conditions of the guide and educational level was not found on the objective comprehension of the victims' rights. The effect of the conditions of the guide on the subjective comprehension of victims' rights indicated a tendency to decrease by perceived stress. Finally, policy implications and limitations of this study were also discussed.

keywords
Before and After Revision Crime Victims' Rights Guide, Objective and Subjective Comprehension, Level of Educational, Perceived Stress, Policy Implication
Submission Date
2020-11-11
Revised Date
Accepted Date

Reference

1.

김민지, 피세영 (2014). 한국형 피의자 권리 고지문에 대한 이해도 평가. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 28(4), 23-46.

2.

김상훈 (2015). 피해자 권리고지 방식과 권리 이해도에 관한 연구. 한림대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

3.

김상훈, 박노섭 (2015). 범죄피해자에 대한 권리고지 방식과 이해도에 관한실증적 연구-가정폭력을 중심으로. 경찰법연구, 13(1), 117-141.

4.

김석우 (2015). 교육평가의 이해. 서울: 학지사.

5.

김재민 (2015). 피해자 정보권에 관한 고찰. 경찰학논총, 10(3), 375-402.

6.

박송희, 김민지 (2019). ‘범죄피해자 권리 및 지원제도 안내서’의 이해도 평가. 한국경찰연구, 18(3), 25-58.

7.

박영도, 최성근, 손희두 (2001). 법률문화 및 법률용어에 관한 국민여론 조사. 한국 법제연구원.

8.

박준호, 서영석 (2010). 대학생을 대상으로 한 한국판 지각된 스트레스 척도 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(3), 611-629.

9.

백윤석, 이미선 (2019). 피의자신문 전 권리 고지 방식 및 내용이 피의자 권리 이해도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 법, 10(2), 111-127.

10.

성태제, 시기자 (2019). 연구방법론. 서울: 학지사.

11.

연성진, 서주연 (2015). 범죄피해자 권리고지 실태 조사 및 개선 방안. 한국형사정책연구원.

12.

이동희 (2018). 피해자 보호․지원을 위한 경찰의 역할과 과제. 경찰법연구, 16(1), 179-205.

13.

장규원 (2011). 피해자학 강의. 파주: 살림.

14.

장규원, 윤현석 (2012). 수사기관의 범죄피해자 정보제공제도 발전방안. 피해자학연구, 20(1), 57-82.

15.

장승일 (2010). 형사절차상 범죄피해자 권리보호에 관한 연구. 법학연구, 37, 217-235.

16.

차준호 (2006). 국내 피의자 권리 고지 실태 및 일반 청소년과 소년범의 피의자고지이해도에 관한 연구. 한림대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

17.

최수형, 김지영, 황지태, 박희정 (2014). 전국범죄 피해조사 2014. 한국형사정책연구원.

18.

허경미 (2011). 피해자학. 서울: 박영사

19.

황혜진 (2013). 정상 노화과정에서의 작업기억 능력과 문장이해력. 대구대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

20.

황혜진 (2015). OECD 성인역량조사결과에 나타난 세대 간 문해력의 차이. 통일인문학, 61, 585-612.

21.

Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of consumer research, 27(2), 123-156.

22.

Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of consumer research, 12(1), 1-16.

23.

Carlson, J. P., Vincent, L. H., Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2009). Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: A quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 864-876.

24.

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396.

25.

Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). Cognitive style, stress perception, and coping. Handbook on stress and anxi ety, 144-158.

26.

Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168-176.

27.

DeVellis, R. F. (2006). Classical test theory. Medical care, 44(11), 50-59.

28.

Ellen, P. S. (1994). Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 43-52.

29.

Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 955-960.

30.

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336.

31.

Feick, L., Park, C. W., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (1992). Knowledge and knowledge of knowledge: What we know, what we think we know, and why the difference makes a difference. Advances in Consumer Research, 19(1), 190-92.

32.

Girotti, M., Adler, S. M., Bulin, S. E., Fucich, E. A., Paredes, D., & Morilak, D. A. (2018). Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 85, 161-179.

33.

Grisso, T. (1998). Instruments for assessing understanding & appreciation of Miranda rights. Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.

34.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

35.

Holroyd, K. A. (1976). Cognition and desensitization in the group treatment of test anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(6), 991.

36.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological review, 99(1), 122.

37.

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction- integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163.

38.

Kintsch, W., & Mangalath, P. (2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 346-370.

39.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.

40.

Luethi, M., Meier, B., & Sandi, C. (2009). Stress effects on working memory, explicit memory, and implicit memory for neutral and emotional stimuli in healthy men. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2:5. doi: 10.3389/ neuro.08.005.2008

41.

Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (1997). Assessment of comprehension in reading. The psychological assessment of reading, 176-203.

42.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing.

43.

Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of consumer research, 8(2), 223-230.

44.

Pieniak, Z., Aertsens, J., & Verbeke, W. (2010). Subjective and objective knowledge as determinants of organic vegetables consumption. Food quality and preference, 21(6), 581-588.

45.

Qureshi, S. U., Long, M. E., Bradshaw, M. R., Pyne, J. M., Magruder, K. M., Kimbrell, T., & Kunik, M. E. (2011). Does PTSD impair cognition beyond the effect of trauma?. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 23(1), 16-28.

46.

Radecki, C. M., & Jaccard, J. (1995). Perceptions of knowledge, actual knowledge, and information search behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(2), 107-138.

47.

Rogers, R., Hazelwood, L. L., Sewell, K. W., Harrison, K. S., & Shuman, D. W. (2008). The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: A replication and vocabulary analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 124-136.

48.

Selnes, F. (1986). Subjective and objective measures of product knowledge contrasted. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 67-71.

49.

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological bulletin, 123(2), 162-185.

logo