바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Influence of Advertising Exposure by Visual-area on Explicit & Implicit Memory

Abstract

Numerous advertisements are in competition to attract consumer. In this environment which surrounds human being, there are more complex and various stimuli. Therefore many advertisements could be disregarded and avoided by people, not useful to purchasing the product. Surely the message of the advertisements will be exposed to the vision of the consumer and affect the memory formation even if people avoid and disregard ads. The purpose of this study used eye-tracker is to investigate the differences in memories that are formed when stimuli are applied on different visual angles. And to find out what influences the familiarity of stimuli applied in different visual areas have on the formation of memories. For the study, 64 university students were presented with stimuli in which familiar and unfamiliar brand. They were exposed in foveal (1°), parafoveal (5°), peripheral (10°) vision, and then the formation of explicit and implicit memories were examined with the visual behavior. The results show that presentation of target stimuli on 1° and 5° is more significantly influential on explicit memory. The results show that main effect of visual angles and visual angle x brand familiarity interaction on explicit memory. Also, the results show that main effect of visual angles and brand familiarity, visual angle x brand familiarity interaction on implicit memory. It suggests that priming can be facilitated without conscious visual attention. This finding is that although consumers did not allocate visual attention to target stimuli like brand or product in ads, they might form implicit memories about target.

keywords
implicit memory, explicit memory, eye tracker, word completion task, brand familiarity

Reference

1.

김완석, 김용민 (1999). 광고에서 암묵적 기억 효과: 상표관련 기억과 태도에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 10(2), 39-61.

2.

김재휘, 안정태 (2004). TV 드라마에서의 제품 배치(PPL)의 광고효과 측정: 암묵적 기억 측정을 통한 접근. 광고연구, 64, 61-83.

3.

김지호, 송미란, 김재휘 (2007). 비의식적 광고 처리에서 나타나는 암묵적 기억의 광고효과-시각적 주의를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 8(1), 81-102.

4.

김지호, 송미란, 김재휘 (2008). 복잡한 시각환경 속에서 소비자는 무엇을 보는가: 자극에 대한 관여의 효과를 중심으로. 한국광고홍보학보, 10(2), 66-97.

5.

박은아 (2005). 노출조건과 반복횟수에 따른 광고효과: 상표친숙도의 조절역할을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 16(5), 195-213.

6.

박태진, 박미자 (1999). 양상이동과 처리수준에 다른 처리 해리: 한국어 단어완성 점화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 11(2), 243-259.

7.

유창조 (1997). 상표이름에 대한 기억성과의 분석: 학습방법과 측정방법에 따른 차이 검증. 광고학연구, 8(1), 9-29.

8.

유창조, 현소은, 김희영 (2008). 암묵적 기억성과에 따른 상표 친숙도, 상표 태도 및 상표 신뢰도의 변화에 대한 분석: 노출횟수와 정보처리유형을 중심으로. 소비자학연구, 19(4), 83-108.

9.

전우재 (2002). 처리-해리 절차를 이용한 외현기억과 암묵기억의 평가. 정맥마취, 6, 173-180.

10.

Babin, L. A., & Thompson C. S. (1996). Viewers’ recognition of brands placed within a film. International Journal of Advertising, 15, 140-151.

11.

Baker, W., Hutchinson, J. W., Moore, D., & Nedungadi, P. (1986). Brand familiarity and advertising: Effect on the evoked set and brand preference. Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 632-642.

12.

Consumer Trend (2004). 광고에 관한 소비자들의 생각. 엠브레인.

13.

Chung, S. W., & Szymanski, K. (1997). Effects of brand name exposure on brand choices: An implicit memory perspective. Advances in Consumer Research. 24, 288-294.

14.

Enrico, D. P., Anna, M. L., & Pierluigi, Z. (1991). Sementic processing of unattended parafoveal words. Acta Psycholody, 77, 21-34.

15.

Kim, G., Choi, K. Y., & Sung, Y. S. (2008). The effects of product placement in movie using explicit and implicit memory-based measurement. International Symposium on Brain & Society, 143-146.

16.

Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 23(5), 553-368.

17.

Gupta, P., & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47-59.

18.

Janiszewski, C. (1988). Preconscious processing effects: The independence of attitude formation and conscious thought. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 199-210.

19.

Kalawsky, R. S. (1993). The science of virtual reality and virtual environments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

20.

Krishnan. H. S., & Chakravarti. D. (1999). Memory measures for pretesting advertisements: An integrative conceptual framework and a diagnostic template, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 1-37.

21.

Krishnan, H. S., & Trappey, C. V. (1999). Nonconscious memory processes in marketing: A historical perspective and future directions. Psychology & Marketing, 16(6), 451-457.

22.

Krugman, H. E. (1977). Memory without recall, exposure without perception. Journal of Advertising Research, 17(4), 7-12.

23.

Lee, A. Y. (2002). Effects of implicit memory on memory-based versus stimulus-based brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(4), 440-454.

24.

Liu, T., Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and fMRI response in human visual cortex. Neuron, 45, 469-477.

25.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.

26.

Naoyuki, O., & Mariko, O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory during reading with and without parafoveal information: A moving-window study. The American Journal of Psychology, 115(4), 501-513.

27.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

28.

Ong, B. S., & Meri, D. (1994). Should product placement in movies be banned? Journal of Promotion Management, 2(3/4), 159- 175.

29.

Parasuraman, R. (2000). The attentive brain, London: A Bradford Book.

30.

Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703-714.

31.

Richardson-Klavehn. A., & Bjork. R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-544.

32.

Rossiter, J., & Percy, L. (1997). Advertising communication and promotion management, second Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

33.

Shanker, K., & Shapiro, S. (1996). Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 147-163.

34.

Shapiro, S., Macinnis, D. J., & S. E. Heckler. (1997). The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 94-104.

35.

Solso, R. L. (2000). Cognition & the visual art. Mit Press.

36.

Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248-261.

37.

Sutherland, M., & Friedman, L. (2000). Do you model ad awareness or advertising awareness? Journal of Advertising Research, 40(5), 32-36.

38.

Tellis, G. J. (1997). Effective frequency: One exposure or three factors? Journal of Advertising research, 37, 75-80.

39.

Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.

40.

Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science. 247, 301-306.

41.

Velmans, M. (1999). When perception becomes conscious. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 543-566.

42.

Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2000). Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Science, 19(4), 297-312.

43.

Yoo, C. Y. (2008). Unconscious processing of web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set. Journal of Interactive marketing, 22(2), 2-18.

logo