바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on Product Placement Effects in the Advertisements Which follows in Product Involvement, Arrangement and Brand Exposures

Abstract

This research is designed to prove the effect of PPL in the advertisement, based on fact that PPL used in the past movies or television programs are widening its ranges to use of plays, music videos, advertisements, and internet. This research proved the effect of placement and appearance of the advertisement, which is the characteristic of advertisement stimulus and effect of PPL for product involvement which is characteristic related to consumers. To prove this research, the lab was tested on 8groups used by2×2×2 factorial design. The lab tested the effect of PPL on interest possibilities of the product, the recall for the brand name and recognition reaction for remembrance reaction, the attitude of the product for the attitude reaction, and reason to purchase for consumer reaction behavior. As the result, high involvement product found out to be more highly meaningful than the low involvement product on possibility of attractiveness recognition reaction, attitude of the product, and reason to purchase. Second, on-set placement had the higher possibilities of attraction, attitude of a product, and reason to purchase intention than the creative placement. Third, for differences based on appearance type showed that when the brand name appeared possibilities of attraction, remembrance reaction, and reason to purchase resulted higher than in between when the brand name did not appear. At last product involvement and appearance type, effect of interaction appeared. Thus, the issue of appearance of brand name has the greater impact on possibility of attraction of the product than product involvement. This research showed the possibilities of PPL effect on various media, related to factors that impact the PPL effect, and suggested that for use of PPL strategy by proving the effect of characteristic of advertisement stimulus and characteristic of consumer.

keywords
PPL, product involvement, product arrangement, brand exposure

Reference

1.

김봉현 (1998). 인쇄매체에 나타난 ‘하이브리드’광고의 활용형태에 관한 내용분석: 국내 4대 일간지에 게재된 기사형 광고를 중심으로. 광고학연구, 9(3), 123-139.

2.

김봉현, 김재휘, 송정미, 탁진영 (2002). 방송에서의 제품삽입 및 간접광고(PPL)의 현황, 인식 및 기준에 대한 연구. (사)한국광고학회.

3.

김진홍 (2001). PPL 전략을 이용한 광고사례 및 활용에 관한 연구. 단국대학교 석사학위논문.

4.

김재영, 유승엽 (2001). 정보원 출처에 따른 광고태도의 매개효과, 광고연구, 53호, 31- 46.

5.

김재휘 (2002). 광고 속의 광고에 대한 효과 : TV-CF에서 제시되는 PPL 광고의 효과. 2002년 가을 연차학술대회 발표 논문집(40-45). (사)한국광고학회.

6.

김재휘, 안정태 (2003). 정보원의 전문성과 시청자의 유행관여도에 따른간접광고의 효과: TV 드라마 속 패션상품 PPL을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 14(1), 95-115.

7.

김태희 (2003). 간접광고의 현황 및 활용방안에 관한 연구: 영화와 TV PPL사례를 중심으로. 목원대학교 석 사학위논문.

8.

박찬욱, 전영종(1997). 직접반응광고에서의 반응수단 정보에 관한 연구. 광고학연구, 8(2). 99-122.

9.

이상빈 (1991). 소비자 관여의 개념화와 측정. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 4(5), 110- 135.

10.

이유재, 최우진 (2004). 제품배치가 소비자의 브랜드 회상과 태도에 미치는 영향: 관여도와 PPL 관련 사전 정보 인지여부의 조절적 역할. 광고학연구, 15(3), 91-112.

11.

이희욱, 이경탁 (2001). 제품배치의 이론적 고찰. 광고연구, 52, 가을호, 91-111.

12.

양 윤, 성충모 (2001). 영화에서의 PPL 광고 효과측정-영화 해가 서쪽에서 뜬다면과 대학생을 중심으로, 광고연구, 제53호, 135-154.

13.

유승엽 (2003a). PPL 속에 제시된 상표에 대한 모자이크처리의 간접광고효과. 미디어 경제와 문화, 1(4), 35-71.

14.

유승엽 (2003b). 스포츠 스타를 모델로 기용한 광고를 어떻게 제작할 것인가?: 카피, 제품 및 배경을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 제14권 5호, 7-31.

15.

최우진 (2003). 제품배치(PPL)에 대한 소비자의 지각과 태도변화에 소비자 특성이 미치는 영향: 관여도와 PPL사전정보를 중심으로. 서울대학교석사학위논문.

16.

Babin, L. A & Carder, S. T. (1996). Viewer's recognition of brands placed within a film. International Journal of Advertising, 15, 140-151.

17.

Batra, T., & Artola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian source of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2, 159-170.

18.

Brennan, I., Dubas, K. M. & Babin, L. A. (1999). The influence of product placement type and exposure time on product-placement recognition, International Journal of Advertising, 18(3), 323-337.

19.

d’Astous, A. & Seguin, N. (1999). Consumer reaction to product placement stratigies in television sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 896-910.

20.

Gupta, P. B., & Gould, S. J. (1997), Consumer’s Perceptions of the Ethics and Acceptability of Product Placement in Movies : Product Category and Individual Difference, Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 19(1), 37-50.

21.

Gupta, P. B., & Lord, K. R. (1998), Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall, Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47-59.

22.

Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 471-480.

23.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and human performance. Palisadae, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.

24.

Karrh. J. A. (1994). Effects of brand placement in motion pictures, Proceedings of the 1994 conference of American Academy of Advertising, 90-96.

25.

Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356.

26.

MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the Ad in advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 3(April), 48-65.

27.

Nebenzahl, I. D. & Secunda, E. (1993). Consumers’ attitudes toward product placement in Movies, International Journal of Advertising, 12(2), 1-11.

28.

Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1969). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522-536.

29.

Russel, C. A. (1998). Toward a framework of product placement: theoretical proposition. Advance in Consumer Research, 25, 357-362.

30.

Shapiro, M. (1993). Product placement in motion pictures. Working paper, Northwestern University.

31.

Shimp, T. A. (1997). Advertising, promotion, and supplemental aspect of integrated marketing communication(4th ed). Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.

32.

Solomon, M. R. (1996). Consumer behavior(3rd ed.), Pentice Hall.

33.

Steortz, E. (1987). The cost efficiency and communication effect with brand name exposure within motion picture. Master’s Thesis, West Virginia University.

34.

Vollmers, S., & Mizerski, R (1994)., A review and investigation into the effectiveness of product placement in films, proceeding of the 1994 conference of the American Academy of advertising Athens, GA: Academt of advertising, 97-102..

35.

Yoon, K. (1992). Involvement level and the mediating role of attitude toward the advertisement. In L. N. Reid(Ed.), Processing oh the 1992 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp.46-54. American Academy of Advertising.

36.

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct, Journal of Consumer Reaserch, 12, 341-352.

37.

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.

38.

Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123-131.

logo