바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The President Who Korean Consumers Want: The Development of Evaluation Scale for President Candidate

Abstract

This study regarded the behavior of voters who selected the president and voted in a presidential election as the behavior of consumers who evaluated attributes of a product and who selected brand. Thus, Rating scale for the presidential candidates was developed in order to evaluate the attributes of the presidential candidates. To do this, exploratory research was conducted with the Focus Group Interviews to extract the attributes that are necessary to assess the presidential candidates. The 140 items about the attributes from the results of the group interviews were found by content analysis. Then, I extracted the attributes that are important for the ideal president of South Korean consumers through calculating the criticality of the questions. As a result, 30 items were extracted through factor analysis, there are 6 factors, competency, integrity, perspicacity, leadership, fidelity and people-friendly policy. Thus, distinct items of the factors was identified and this scale was proved to be a verified scale from testing the confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, I discussed meaning and limitations about this study and suggested the directions for the future researches.

keywords
President candidate, Evaluation Scale

Reference

1.

김미영 (2008). 방송사 선거 예측조사, 4연속 낙제점. 마이데일리. 2008. 4. 10.

2.

김석준 (2002). 현대대통령연구 I. 서울: 대영문화사.

3.

김용순 (2009). 후보자의 이미지와 유권자의 선택: 컨조인트 분석을 통한 탐색적 연구. 인문사회과학연구, 24, 35-66.

4.

김현주 (1999). 대통령 후보에 대한 이미지 형성과 커뮤니케이션. 한국방송학보, 12호, 45-73.

5.

박찬욱 (1993). 제14대 국회의원 총선거에서의 정당지지 분석. 한국의 선거 1, 나남출판사.

6.

송건섭 (2010). 유권자의 후보자 선택모델 검증 및 비교. 한국행정논집, 22(3), 671-691.

7.

이경렬, 이철영, 박현길 (2008). 모바일매체를 이용한 정치광고가 후보자이미지 및 투표의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 광고학연구, 19(2), 79-101.

8.

정성호 편저 (2004). 선거캠페인과 미디어전략. 서울 차송.

9.

정성호 (2006). 정치 커뮤니케이션이 후보자 이미지 형성과 태도변화에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 커뮤니케이션학 연구, 14(3), 63 -91.

10.

고경엽 (2011). ‘선거예측은 그래도 여론조사’. 제주일보. 2011. 10. 1.

11.

탁진영 (2005). 후보자 이미지 형성에 미치는 텔레비전 정치광고의 효과에 관한 연구: 이미지 구성요소를 중심으로. 광고학연구, 16(1), 7-35.

12.

탁진영 (2006). 텔레비전 정치광고가 후보자 이미지 구성요소에 미치는 영향: 시간적 경과에 따른 변화를 중심으로. 광고학 연구, 50(5), 328-353.

13.

황상민, 김도환 (2003). 대통령 후보의 이미지 분석에 나타난 세대와 라이프스타일의 심리: 심리학 연구의 사회적 응용을 위한 또 다른 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(3), 181-193.

14.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, p.84.

15.

Anderson, L. R., & Bass, A. R. (1967). Some effects of victory or defeat upon perception of political candidates. Journal of Social Psychology, 73, 227-240.

16.

Basil, M., Schooler, C., & Reeves, B. (1991). Positive and negative political advertising: Effectiveness of ads and perceptions of candidates. In F. Biocca(Ed.), Television and political advertising: Vol. I Psychological processes (245-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17.

Boulding, K. (1956). The images. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

18.

Boyd, R. W. (1969). Presidential elections: An explanation of voting defection. American Political Science Review, 63, 488-514.

19.

Boynton, G. R., & Lodge, M. (1994). Voters' images of candidates.. In A. H. Miller and B. E. Gronbeck(Eds.), Presidential campaigns and American self-images (176-189). Boulder, CO: Westview.

20.

Clark, T. (1979). An exploration of generic aspects of contemporary American campaign organizations. Central State Speech Journal, 30, 122-133.

21.

Corbett, M. (1991). American public opinion: Trends, processes, and patterns. New York: Longman.

22.

Cundy, D. T. (1986). Political commercials and candidate image: The effect can be substantial. In L. L. Kaid, D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders(Eds.). New perspectives on political advertising (pp.210-234). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.

23.

Delvin, L. P. (1986). An analysis of presidential television commercials, 1952-1984. In L. L. Kaid, D. Nimmo, and K. R. Sanders(Eds.), New Perspectives on Political Advertising (pp. 21-54). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

24.

Fishbein, M. (1973). The prediction of behaviors from attitudinal variables. In C. D. Mortensen and K. K. Sereno (EDs.). advances in communication research. New York: Harper and Row.

25.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, interaction and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

26.

Flanigan, w. H., & Zingale, N. H. (1994). Political behavior of the American electorate(8th ed.). Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

27.

Geiger, S. F., & Reeves, B. (1991). The effects of visual structure and content emphasis on the evaluation and memory for political candidates. In F. Biocca(Ed.), Television and Political advertising: Vol.1. Psychological processes (pp. 125-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

28.

Graber, D. G. (1984). Processing the news. New York: Longman.

29.

Hacker, K. L. (1986). Political image formulation in nonmediated communication: A conversation analysis of political argumentation. Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Speech, University of Oregon.

30.

Hacker, K. L. (1995). Interpersonal communication and the construction of candidate images. In K. L. Hacker(Ed.), Candidates images in presidential elections (pp.65-82). Westport, CT: Praeger.

31.

Hacker, K. L., Zakahi, W. R., Giles, M. J., & McQuitty, S. (2000). Components of candidate images: Statistical analysis of the issue-persona dichotomy in the Presidential campaign of 1996. Communication Monographs, 67, No. 3, 227-238.

32.

Hellweg, S. A. (1995). Candidates and candidate images in American Presidential elections. In K. L. Hacker(Ed.), Candidates images in presidential elections (pp.1-18). Westport, CT: Praeger.

33.

Johnston, A., & Kaid, L. L. (2002). Image ads and issue ads in U. S. Presidential advertising. Journal of Communication, 52, 281-300.

34.

Kaid, L. L. (1991). The effects of television broadcasts on perceptions of political candidates in the United States and France. In L. L. Kaid, J. Gerstle, & K. R. Sanders(Eds.). Mediated politics in two cultures: Presidential campaigning in the United States and France (pp.247-260). New York: Praeger.

35.

Kaid, L. L. (1995). Measuring candidate images with semantic differentials. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.), Candidates images in presidential elections (pp.131-134). Westport, CT: Praeger.

36.

Kaid, L. L., & Chanslor, M. (1995). Changing candidate image: The effects of negative political advertising. In K. L. Hacker(Ed.), Candidates images in presidential elections (pp. 83-98). Westport, CT: Praeger.

37.

Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyle in Presidential campaigns: style and content of televised political advertising. Westport. CT: Praeger.

38.

Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.

39.

Louden, A. (1994). Voter rationality and media excess; Image in the 1992 presidential campaign, In R. E. Denton(Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign: a communication perspective (169-187). Westport, CT: Praeger.

40.

McCain, T. A., & Rewand, P. (1973). The effect of camera treatment on political speakers' credibility: Network television coverage of speeches of Ted Kennedy and George McGovern th the 1972 Democratic National Convention. Paper presented the International Communication Association Convention. Montreal.

41.

McCombs, M., & Estrada, G. (1997). “The news media and the pictures in our heads”, In S. Iyengar and R. Reeves, eds., Do the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters, and Reporters in America. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

42.

McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65-72.

43.

McCroskey, J. C., Jensen, T., & Todd, C. (1972). The generalizability of source credibility scales for public figures. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association Convention. Chicago.

44.

Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1984). Cognitive Representations of candidate assessments. In K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid and D. Nimmo(Eds.). Political Communication Yearbook 1984(183-210). Carbonate.

45.

Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80 (2), 521-540.

46.

Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

47.

Nimmo, D. D., & Savage, R. L. (1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods, and findings. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.

48.

Pfau, M., Van Winkle, K., Diedrichi, & Larson, K. (1993). The role and impact of communication modalities on voters' perceptions of political candidates during presidential primary election campaigns. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention. Washington, DC.

49.

Rabinowitz, G., & Macdonald, S. E. (1989). “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 33. 1.

50.

Ross, L., & Anderson, C. A. (1982). “Shortcoming in the Attribution Pross: on the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessment,” in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky(eds.), Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University, Press.

51.

Sarlvik, B., & Crewe, I. (1983). Decode of Dealignment, Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Siegel, R. S. (1964). Effect of partisanship on the perception of political candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 28, 483-496.

53.

Wakshlag, J. J., & Edison, N. G. (1979). Attraction, credibility, perceived similarity, and the image of public figures. Communication Quarterly, 27, 27-34.

54.

Wattenberg, M. P. (1992). The rise of candidate- centeredpolitics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

55.

Wattenberg, M. P. (2004). Elections: Personal popularity in U. S. presidential elections. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 143-155.

56.

Wyer, S. T., Budesheim, T. L., Shavitt, S., Riggle, E. D., Melton, R. J., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1991). Image, issues, and ideology: The processing of information about political candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 533-545.

logo