바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The Effect of Consumers' Self-Regulatory Mode on Time-Scarcity Promotion

Abstract

This study examined the effects of consumers' self-regulatory mode on time scarcity promotion. The design of this research was comprised of 2(self-regulatory mode: assessment mode vs. locomotion mode) × 2(time scarcity message vs. non-scarcity message) between subjects factorial design. The finding revealed that consumers who have assessment mode showed more positive evaluation toward products that used scarcity message than those of non-scarcity message. On the other hand, consumers who have locomotion mode demonstrated no difference of product evaluations across two message conditions. Also we found the mediating role of anticipated regret attributed to no purchase on product evaluations. Finally our research could give the implication that time-scarcity promotion effects may vary depending on the consumer's self-regulatory mode and firms need to develop their scarcity marketing strategy based on regulatory mode.

keywords
Self-regulatory mode, Time-scarcity promotion, Time-scarcity message, Anticipated regrets of no purchase, Product evaluations

Reference

1.

김재휘, 부수현 (2007). 희소성 메시지와 프레이밍 방식이 구매의도에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지, 8(2), 183-203.

2.

배윤경, 이석규, 차태훈 (2004). 인터넷 쇼핑에서 희소성 메시지가 소비자 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 광고학연구, 15(5), 503-521.

3.

성영신, 이지연 (2003). TV홈쇼핑의 희소성 메시지 연구 - 제품관여도의 조절효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집, 73-74.

4.

성형석, 한상린 (2010). 고객의 자기조절성향이 서비스 실패에 따른 부정적 감정과 고객반응에 미치는 영향 - 귀인과정에 따른 조정적 역할을 중심으로. 한국마케팅저널, 12(2), 83-110.

5.

여준상 (2005). 마케팅에서의 희소성효과 연구. 고려대학고 박사학위논문.

6.

이성수 (2009). 소비자 의사결정에서 사전가정사고와 예상된 후회의 역할: 종결욕구와 낙관-비관주의의 조절, 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 10(1), 147-166.

7.

이재용, 이철성, 이호배 (2012). 가격할인제품판매에서의 희소성 메시지 효과 - 수량한정 및 시간한정 가격할인을 중심으로. 경영학연구, 41(6), 1591-1618.

8.

이준용 (2009). 소비욕망의 개념화와 소비욕망-구매 전환모델 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

9.

최은영, 임지은, 황장선 (2011). 희소성 메시지의 광고 효과: 한정판과 시간압박을 중심으로. 광고연구, 89, 177-204.

10.

하환호 (2007). 구매과정에서 느낀 선택의 어려움과 예상된 후회감이 인터넷 쇼핑몰 이용고객의 만족과 충성도에 미치는 영향. 서비스경영학회지, 8(3), 85-107.

11.

Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, Assessment, and Regulatory Fit: Value Transfer from “How” to “What”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525-530.

12.

Barone, M. J. & Miniard, P. W. (2002). Mood and Brand Extension Judgment: Asymmetric Effects for Desirable Versus Undesirable Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 283-290.

13.

Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, 21, 961-981.

14.

Bozzolo, A. M. & Brock, T. C. (1992). Unavailability Effects on Message Processing: A Theoretical Analysis and an Empirical Test. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 93-101.

15.

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.

16.

Brock, T. C. (1968). Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change. In Greenwald, A. G., Brock, T. C. & Ostrom, T. M. (Eds), Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, New York: Academic Press.

17.

Carmon, Z. & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the Forgone: Why Value Can Appear so Different to Buyers and Sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 360-370.

18.

Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel Like Losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.

19.

Cialdini, R. B. (1985). Influence: Science and Practice. Glenvier. IL: Scott, Foresman.

20.

Cooke, A. D., Meyvis, T., & Schwartz, A. (2001). Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase-timing Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 447-459.

21.

Fein, S., Hilton, J. L., & Miller, D. T. (1989). The Effects of Suspicion on Dispositional Inference. Paper Presented at the Sixty-First Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

22.

Friestad, M. & Wright, P. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuation Attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31.

23.

Inman, J. J., Peter, A. C., & Raghubir, P. (1997). Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 68-79.

24.

Jung, J. M. & Kellaris, J. J. (2004). Cross-national Differences in Proneness to Scarcity Effect: The Moderating Roles of Familiarity, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Need for Cognitive Closure. Psychology and Marketing, 21(9), 739-759.

25.

Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., & Nathanson, A. (2000). The Influence of Anticipated Counterfactual Regret on Behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 345-368.

26.

Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., & Shah, J. Y. (2000). To “Do the Right Thing” or to “Just Do It”: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Self-Regulatory Imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 793-815.

27.

Knishinsky, A. (1982). The Effects of Scarcity of Material and Exclusivity of Information on Industrial Buyer Perceived Risk in Provoking a Purchase Decision. (Ph. D. dissertation, Ari-zona State University).

28.

Loomes, G. & Sugden, R. (1983). Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805- 824.

29.

Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8, 67-78.

30.

Mannetti, L., Leder, S., Insalata, L., Pierro, A., Higgins, T., & Kruglanski, A. (2009). Priming the Ant or the Grasshopper in People's Mind: How Regulatory Mode Affects Inter-Temporal Choices. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1120-1125.

31.

Orehek, E., Mauro, R., Kruglanski, A. W., & van der Bles, A. M. (2012). Prioritizing Association Strength Versus Value: The Influence of Self-Regulatory Modes on Means Evaluation in Single Goal and Multigoal Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 22-31.

32.

Pierro, Antonio, Arie W. Kruglanski E., & Tory Higgins. (2006). Regulatory Mode: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Orientations. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 355-477.

33.

Pierro, A., Leder, s., Mannetti, L., Higgins, E. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Aiello, A. (2008). Regulatory Mode Effects on Counterfactual Thinking and Regret, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 321-329.

34.

Pierro, A., Giacomantonio, M., Pica, G., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2011). On the Psychology of Time in Action: Regulatory Mode Orientations and Procrastination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1317-1331.

35.

Tykocinski, O. E., Pttman, T. S., & Tuttle, E. E. (1995). Inaction Inertia: Foregoing Future Benefits as a Result of an Initial Failure to Act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 793-803.

36.

Tykocinski, O. E. & Pttman, T. S. (2001). Product Aversion Following a Missed Opportunity: Price Contrast or Avoidance of Anticipated Regret? Basic and Applied Social Psycholosy, 23, 149-156.

37.

Yeo, J. & Park, J. (2009). Effects of a Scarcity Message on Product Judgments: Role of Cognitive Load and Mediating Processes. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 718-719.

38.

West, S. G. (1975). Increasing the Attractiveness of College Cafeteria Food: A Reactance Theory Perspective. Journal of Applied Psy-chology. 60, 656-658.

39.

Wu, W. Y., Lu, H. Y., Wu, Y. Y., and Fu, C. S. (2012). The Effects of Product Scarcity and Consumers' Need for Uniqueness on Purchase Intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 263-274.

logo