바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Online banner ads for a political party: The role of online banner ad exposure locations and voter’s age groups

Abstract

As the time spent on the Internet increases, while people search information on the Internet they are accidently exposed to political information which are provided by political parties. This even applies to voters who are indifferent about politics. To investigate such phenomenon, this study examined how (a) the exposure locations (the left side vs. the right side of primarily-attended news article) of an online banner ad for a political party and (b) age groups (males and females in their 20’s vs. 40’s) would have an independent or an interactive effect on voters’ explicit and implicit attitude toward the party. The study was a 2 (ad exposure locations: left-adjacent vs. right-adjacent online banner ad for a political party) X 2 (age groups: 20’s vs. 40’s) between-participants design. An online Internet searching task, self-reported measures and Implicit Association Test was conducted in the experiment. As a result, the exposure locations of the online banner ad for a party and the age groups did not have an independent or an interactive effect on the implicit and explicit attitude toward the party. However, an interaction between the exposure locations of the online banner ad and the age groups on the implicit attitude was found. Compare to other experimental groups, the participants who are in their 20’s showed highest implicit attitude toward the party when the online banner ad was placed on the left side of the primarily-attended news article. Interestingly, they did not recognized the existence of the political party’s online banner ad during reading the news article.

keywords
political communication, online banner ad, implicit attitude, preattentive processing

Reference

1.

강내원 (2004). 인터넷과 대중매체 이용이 참여에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국언론학보, 48(3), 116-143.

2.

김병옥 (2008). 브랜드 디자인에 있어서 언어정보와 시각정보의 일치성에 관한 연구: 브랜드 네임의 시각적 전이를 중심으로. 한국디자인문화 학회지, 14(3), 79-88.

3.

김용철 (2004). 한국과 미국 정당들의 인터넷 선거운동과 경쟁양상. 한국정당학회보, 3(1), 63-94.

4.

김용철, 윤성이 (2004). 제17 대 총선에서 인터넷의 영향력 분석: 선거관심도와 투표참여를 중심으로. 한국정치학회보, 38(5), 197-216.

5.

나은경, 이강형, 김현석 (2009). 댓글 읽기/쓰기를 통한 온라인 소통이 대의민주주의 사회에서 갖는 의미. 한국언론학보, 53(1), 109-132.

6.

박찬욱 (2005). 한국인 정치참여의 특징과 결정요인: 2004년 조사결과 분석. 한국정치연구, 14(1), 147-193.

7.

반 현, 김수정 (2007). 동영상 UCC 이용과 정치 행태에 관한 연구. 사이버커뮤니케이션 학보, 22, 123-166.

8.

서영길 (2012. 11. 23). 대선 코앞에 둔 여․야 ‘색깔’있는 온라인 배너 광고. The PR News. http://www.the-pr.co.kr.에서 2014. 1. 5 자료 얻음.

9.

서현진 (2003). 한국과 미국 정당의 정치커뮤니케이션 수단으로서 인터넷 활용에 관한 연구. 한국정당학회보, 2(2), 113-136.

10.

성수빈 (2013. 12. 2). 다음에서 가장 많이 검색된 검색어 1위 ‘네이버.’ 시사포커스. http://www.sisafocus.co.kr.에서 2014. 1. 5 자료 얻음.

11.

신지홍 (2012. 4. 12). 새누리 단독과반 승리..‘박근혜 대세론’ 탄력. 연합뉴스. http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr.에서 2013. 12. 10 자료 얻음.

12.

유희연 (2012. 3. 19). 4.11 총선 앞두고 온라인광고 시장 달아오른다. 뉴시스. http://www. newsis.com.에서 2014. 1. 6 자료 얻음.

13.

이영민 (2010). 20대의 정치의식 특성과 정치성향의 형성경로. 사회연구, 19(1), 9-43.

14.

이현출 (2004). 한국 유권자의 정당지지 구조와 안정성. 대한정치학회보, 12(2), 129- 154.

15.

인터넷트렌드 (2013). 인터넷 포털 사이트 점유율. http://www.trend.logger.co.kr.에서 2014. 1. 5 자료 얻음.

16.

정인선, 송채경화 (2015. 1. 30). “저는 몰래 당원입니다” ‘당원’활동 밝히면 취업과 승진에서 암묵적인 차별... “나는 정치에 관심 없다”는 말이 부끄럽지 않은 ‘정치혐오증’ 사회의 초상. 한겨레21. http://www.h21.hani.co.kr.에서 2015년 2. 3 자료 얻음.

17.

정홍진 (2008. 11. 20) 무당층 무려 52.8%...정치권 빅뱅 예고. 시사1번지 폴리뉴스. http://www.polinews.co.kr.에서 2014년 1. 5 자료 얻음.

18.

중앙선거관리위원회 (2012). 제19대 국회의원선거 투표율 분석. 서울: 중앙선거관리위원회.

19.

한국인터넷진흥원 (2013). 2013년 인터넷이용실태조사 요약보고서. 서울: 한국인터넷진흥원.

20.

한국온라인광고협회 (2014). 2013년 온라인광고 시장 규모 조사. http://www.onlinead.or.kr.에서 2015년 1. 30 자료 얻음.

21.

Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27-58.

22.

Allen, M. (1983). Models of hemispheric specialization. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 73.

23.

Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2000). Patterns of Internet and traditional news media use in a networked community. Political Communication, 17(1), 21-45.

24.

Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 169-195.

25.

Brunel, F. F., Tietje, B. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 385-404.

26.

Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.

27.

Dandurand, F., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 428-434.

28.

Egan, L. C., Santos, L. R., & Bloom, P. (2007). The origins of cognitive dissonance evidence from children and monkeys. Psychological Science, 18(11), 978-983.

29.

Friedman, A., & Polson, M. C. (1981). Hemispheres as independent resource system: Limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 1031-1058.

30.

Friese, M., Wanke, M., & Plessner, H. (2006). Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23(9), 727-740.

31.

Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692.

32.

Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 178-188.

33.

Greenwald, A. G., & Leavitt, C. (1984). Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 581-592.

34.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464.

35.

Han, G. (2008). New media use, sociodemographics, and voter turnout in the 2000 presidential election. Mass Communication & Society, 11(1), 62-81.

36.

Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta- analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369-1385.

37.

Homer, P. M. (1990). The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: Some additional evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 78-86.

38.

Janiszewski, C. (1988). Preconscious processing effects: The independence of attitude formation and conscious thought. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 199-209.

39.

Janiszewski, C. (1990a). The influence of print advertisement organization on affect toward a brand name. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 53-65.

40.

Janiszewski, C. (1990b). The influence of nonattended material on the processing of advertising claims. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 263-278.

41.

Janiszewski, C. (1993). Preattentive mere exposure effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3) 376-392.

42.

Karp, J. A., Vowles, J., Banducci, S. A., & Donovan, T. (2002). Strategic voting, party activity, and candidate effects: Testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand's new mixed system. Electoral Studies, 21(1), 1-22.

43.

Karpinski, A., Steinman, R. B., & Hilton, J. L. (2005). Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(7), 949-962.

44.

Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173-192.

45.

Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 416.

46.

Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723.

47.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 101.

48.

Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Barge (Ed.), Automatic Processes in Social Thinking and Behavior (pp. 265-292). London: Psychology Press.

49.

Pandelaere, M., Millet, K., & den Bergh, B. V. (2010). Madonna or Don McLean? The effect of order of exposure on relative liking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 442-451.

50.

Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.

51.

Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

52.

Rivera, L. O., Arms-Chavez, C. J., & Zarate, M. A. (2012). Hemispheric resource availability influences face perception: A multiple resource approach to social perception. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 17(3), 369-383.

53.

Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A system of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 995-1008.

54.

Ryu, G., Lim, E. A. C., Tan, L. T. L., & Han, Y. J. (2007). Preattentive processing of banner advertisements: The role of modality, location, and interference. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(1), 6-18.

55.

Salwen, M. B., Garrison, B., & Driscoll, P. D. (2005). The baseline survey projects: Exploring questions. In M. A. Salwan, B. Garrison, & P. D. Driscoll (Eds.), Online News and the Public (pp. 121-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

56.

Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638-656.

57.

Shapiro, S., MacInnis, D. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1997). The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 94-104.

58.

Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-46.

59.

Yi, Y. (1990). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19(2), 40-48.

logo