바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Persuasive Communication and Sympathetic Communication

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to distinguish persuasive and sympathetic communication, to examine the differences of psychological and advertising responses, as well as trust construction and the psychological capital according to persuasive and sympathetic messages. In two experiments, data was taken from 80 undergraduates who were exposed at persuasive and sympathetic stimuli. The differences testings were performed on psychological responses such as satisfaction and happiness, advertising responses such as message attitude and purchasing intention, trust construction and the psychological capital. To ensure reliability and validity of scales used, data was analyzed with internal consistency and factor analysis, and t tests were conducted for hypotheses testing. According to the results, Hypothesis Ⅰ(Sympathetic communications will produce more favorable psychological responses than persuasive communications), Hypothesis Ⅱ(Sympathetic communications will produce more favorable advertising responses than persuasive communications) and Hypothesis Ⅲ(Sympathetic communications will produce more trust and the psychological capital than persuasive communications) were all supported. These findings showed that sympathetic communications are more effective on psychological and advertising responses and on trust and the psychological capital than persuasive communications. In order, therefore, to raise advertising effect, it is suggested to focus more on sympathetic communications than persuasive communications. Finally, limitations of this study and directions for further studies are discussed.

keywords
Persuasive Communication, Sympathetic Communication, Trust, Psychological and Advertising Responses, Psychological Capital

Reference

1.

김미림 (2010). 공감화법과 개인성격의 상관성 연구. 선문대학교 박사학위청구논문.

2.

김은주, 김정일, 우훈식, 남승규 (2012). 소비자 공감과 메시지 전략. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 13(4), 729-750

3.

김항중, 남승규 (2014). 공감 커뮤니케이션 모형. 광고학연구, 25(7), 139-160.

4.

남승규 (2009). 소비자분석. 서울: 학지사.

5.

남승규 (2010). 소비자 공감에 대한 이론적 연구, 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 11(4), 619-636.

6.

남승규 (2011). 광고반응평가차원에 기초한 광고효과 제고 전략. 광고학연구, 22(8), 45-58.

7.

남승규 (2012). 소비자 공감과 소비자 행복. 한국소비자학회 춘계학술대회논문집, 25-30.

8.

남승규 (2014). 소비자 공감모듈에 기반을 둔 소비자 접점관리. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 15(1), 57-76.

9.

로버트 치알디니 (2002). 설득의 심리학. 서울: 21세기북스. 이현우 역. Robert, B. Cialdini (2001). Influence: Science and practice. 4th.

10.

박성희 (2004). 공감학: 어제와 오늘. 서울: 학지사.

11.

양윤, 김신혜 (2011). 메시지 틀, 조절초점, 지각된 위험이 광고메시지 태도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 22(1), 257-276

12.

이동섭, 최용득 (2010). 긍정심리자본의 선행요인과 결과에 관한 연구. 경영학연구, 39(1), 1-28.

13.

제러미 리프킨 (2010). 공감의 시대. 서울: 민음사. 이경남 역. Jeremy Rifkin(2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis.

14.

존 더글라스 (2014). 신뢰가 실력이다. 서울: 함께 북스. 최유리 역. John Douglas(2013). Skill of trust.

15.

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4), 310-323.

16.

Beck, R. C. (2004). Motivation: Theories and Principles. Pearson/Prentice Hall.

17.

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 3, 388-404.

18.

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

19.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

20.

Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 14, 4, 209-213.

21.

Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569-598.

22.

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). The myths of happiness: What should make you happy, but doesn’t what shouldn’t make you happy, but does. New York: The Penguin Press.

24.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

25.

Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.

26.

Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind. New York: Riverhead Books.

27.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

28.

Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1997). Advertising, communications and promotion management. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

29.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.

30.

Schurr, P. H., & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on exchange processes: Buyer’s preconceptions of seller’s trust worthness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 939-954.

31.

Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

32.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.

33.

Statt, D. A. (1997). Understanding the consumer: A psychological approach. Macmillian Press Ltd.

34.

Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption- based affective responses and postpurchase process. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 258-270.

35.

Zaltman, G. (2003). How customers think: Essential insights into the mind of the market. Harvard Business Press.

logo