바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effects of Consumers' Empathic Responses and Expected Participation of Others on Their Boycott Decision: Moderating Role of the Severity of Negative Events

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand consumers’ boycott decision making process and to extend literature on boycott behavior by examining the factors that influence on consumers’ boycott participation decision, and identifying the relationship between the factors. First, the effects of consumers’ empathic responses high or low) to the victim of a target company generated incident and consumers’ perceived overall expected participation of others in a boycott on their likelihood of boycott participation were demonstrated. Second, the interaction of the two variables on consumers’ likelihood of boycott was also identified. Third, the moderating role of the severity of incidents was also exploratively examined. The data were collected from undergraduate students(N = 321) at a large city university in and ANOVAs were employed to determine the relationships between the variables. The results show that the main effects of both of consumers’ perceived empathic level and overall expected participation on their likelihood of boycott participation were significant. Further, the interaction effect of consumers’ perceived empathic level and overall expected participation on their likelihood of boycott was also significant. On the other hand, the moderating role of the severity of incidents was found to be significant in the effect of consumers’ perceived empathic level on their likelihood of boycott participation. However, there was no significant moderating effect in the effect of consumers’ perceived overall expected participation on their likelihood of boycott participation. Detailed academic discussions that extend the consumers’ boycott decision making process and managerial implications for practices based on the results of this study are provided in the conclusion section.

keywords
Boycott, Empathy, Expected participation, Consumer rights, Severity of incidents

Reference

1.

곽정수 (2017, 6.28). 호식이두마리치킨 회장 잘못으로 가맹점 매출 최대 40% 감소. 한겨레

2.

신성연 (2015). The motivational consequences of consumers' emotions on boycott participation, 동아대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

3.

윤성욱, 유명길, 서미옥 (2007). 서비스 실패와 복구전략에 관한 한국과 일본의 비교연구. 관광레저연구, 19(3), 223-241.

4.

이한석, 주영혁 (2011). 온라인 보이콧 행동에서 감정이입의 역할. 소비문화연구, 14(2), 25-43.

5.

최지은 (2017). 유명인 광고모델이 부정적 사건의 피해자가 된 상황에서 소비자의 정당화 과정이 광고모델에 대한 반응에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 18(1), 27-41.

6.

Abdul-Talib, A. N., Abd-Latif, S. A., & Abd- Razak, I. S. (2016). A study on the boycott motivations of malaysian non-muslims. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 7(3), 264-287.

7.

Ahmed, Z., Anang, R., Othman, N., & Sambasivan, M. (2013). To purchase or not to purchase US products: Role of religiosity, animosity, and ethno-centrism among malaysian consumers. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(7), 551-563.

8.

Andreini, D., Rinallo, D., Pedeliento, G., & Bergamaschi, M. (2017). Brands and religion in the secularized marketplace and workplace: Insights from the case of an italian hospital renamed after a roman catholic pope. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 529-550.

9.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56-70.

10.

Batson, C. D., O'Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. M. (1983). Influence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motivation to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 706-718.

11.

Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In Gilbert D, Fiske S. & Lindzey G. (Eds.), (4th ed., pp. 554-594). New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Cissé-Depardon, K., & N'Goala, G. (2009). The effects of satisfaction, trust and brand commitment on consumers' decision to boycott. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 24(1), 43-66.

13.

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

14.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.

15.

Decety, J., & Hodges, S. D. (2007). The social neuroscience of empathy. In P. A. M. Van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches(pp. 103-109). Psychology Press.

16.

Dekhil, F., Jridi, H., & Farhat, H. (2017). Effect of religiosity on the decision to participate in a boycott: The moderating effect of brand loyalty-the case of coca-cola. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(2), 309-328.

17.

Edwards, R., Gut, A., & Mavondo, F. (2007). Buyer animosity in business to business markets: Evidence from the french nuclear tests. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 483-492.

18.

Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665-697.

19.

Ettenson, R., & Gabrielle Klein, J. (2005). The fallout from french nuclear testing in the south pacific: A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199-224.

20.

Farah, M. F., & Newman, A. J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio- cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347-355.

21.

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2003). Theories of fairness and reciprocity-evidence and economic applications. In M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Advances in economics and econometrics, 8th world congress(pp. 208-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.

23.

Fisher, R. J., & Ackerman, D. (1998). The effects of recognition and group need on volunteerism: A social norm perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 262-275.

24.

Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing" conditional cooperation" in a field experiment. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1717-1722.

25.

Friedman, M. (1999). Consumer boycotts: Effecting change through the marketplace and the media. Psychology Press.

26.

Garrett, D. E. (1987). The effectiveness of marketing policy boycotts: Environmental opposition to marketing. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 46-57.

27.

Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33-48.

28.

Harmeling, C. M., Magnusson, P., & Singh, N. (2015). Beyond anger: A deeper look at consumer animosity. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(6), 676-693.

29.

Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(3), 239-260.

30.

Ho, S. S., Konrath, S., Brown, S., & Swain, J. E. (2014). Empathy and stress related neural responses in maternal decision making. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 152. doi:10.3389/ fnins.2014.00152

31.

Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Hoffmann, S. (2013). Are boycott motives rationalizations? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(3), 214-222.

33.

Ickes, W. (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford Press.

34.

Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 730-742.

35.

John, A., & Klein, J. (2003). The boycott puzzle: Consumer motivations for purchase sacrifice. Management Science, 49(9), 1196-1209.

36.

Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In G. Swanson, T. Newcomb & E. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology(2nd ed., pp. 410-414). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

37.

Klandermas, B. (1992). Persuasive communication: Measures to overcome real-life social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), A social psychological approach to social dilemmas(pp. 307-318). New York: Pergamon.

38.

Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the people's republic of china. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89-100.

39.

Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92-109.

40.

Koku, P. S., Akhigbe, A., & Springer, T. M. (1997). The financial impact of boycotts and threats of boycott. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 15-20.

41.

Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. (1998). Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior. In J. W. Alba, & W. Hutchinson (Eds.), Advances in consumer research(pp. 475-480). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

42.

Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691-704.

43.

Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers' vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 543-554.

44.

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

45.

Levenson, R. W., & Ruef, A. M. (1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 234-246.

46.

Makarem, S. C., & Jae, H. (2016). Consumer boycott behavior: An exploratory analysis of twitter feeds. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 193-223.

47.

Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. New York: Penguin Group.

48.

Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399-417.

49.

Shoham, A., Davidow, M., Klein, J. G., & Ruvio, A. (2006). Animosity on the home front: The intifada in israel and its impact on consumer behavior. Journal of International Marketing, 14(3), 92-114.

50.

Stevens, J. (1999). Interaction effects in ANOVA. Retrieved from http://pages.uoregon.edu/stevensj/ interaction.pdf

51.

Stout, P. A., & Leckenby, J. D. (1986). Measuring emotional response to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 35-42.

52.

Wiener, J. L., & Doescher, T. A. (1994). Cooperation and expectations of cooperation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13(2), 259-270.

53.

Wispé, L. (1990). History of the concept of empathy. In N. Eisenberg, & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development(pp. 17-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Witkowski, T. H. (1989). Colonial consumers in revolt: Buyer values and behavior during the nonimportation movement, 1764-1776. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 216-226.

logo