.png){kind=logo}
ISSN : 1229-8778
This study proposes a new framework which analyzes styles in print ads based on structural relationships between visuals and copies. The framework classifies print ads into unframed ads and framed ads. Unframed ads refer to ads with visuals and copies that are not related each other or ads with visual only whereas framed ads refer to ads whose visuals and copies are related each other. Framed ads include product display ads, redundancy/anchoring ads, association ads, and causation ads. This study performed a content analysis of 668 ads in 20 general affairs and women's magazines in terms of visual-copy relationship, product type and consumption value. Results show that 6% of the sampling ads are unframed ads and 94% are framed ads and the proportion of product display ads is relatively high in search goods whereas causation ads and redundancy/anchoring ads capture relatively high portion in experience goods and credence goods, respectively. Also the proportion of causation ads is significantly higher in utilitarian goods than hedonic goods whereas the proportion of visual only ads is significantly higher in hedonic goods than utilitarian goods. It is expected that the findings of visual-copy relationships will provide important theoretical and practical implications for consumer information processing and creative strategies.
강태완 (1999). 광고에 나타난 시각적 설득의 수사학에 관한 연구. 광고연구, 52(여름), 169-187.
양웅, 김충현 (2005). 광고표현의 수사적 특징 변화 연구 - 1993년~2003년 국내 잡지광고를 대상으로. 광고연구, 57(봄), 239-265.
우석봉, 성영신 (2005). 비주얼의 기대불일치성과 표현 독특성: 독창적 광고비주얼의 광고효과. 광고학연구, 16(3), 219-250.
Ang, S. H. & Lim, E. A. C. (2006). The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 35 (2), 39-53.
Babin, N. J., Darden, W. R. & Griffin M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (March), 644-656.
Carroll, B. A. & Ahuvia A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Market Letters, 17, 79-89.
Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64 (October), 65-81.
Clow, K. E., Berry, C. T., Kranenburg, K. E., & James, K. E. (2005). An examination of the visual element of service advertisements. The Marketing Management Journal, 15 (1), 33-45.
Darby, M. R. & Karni., E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16 (April), 67-88.
Edell, J. A. & Staelin, R. (1983) The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (June), 45-61.
Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-based applications and extensions in advertising: Motivating more extensive ad processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (June), 87-99.
Hirschman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. E. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46 (3), 92-101.
Houston, M. J., Childers, T. L., & Heckler, S. E. (1987). Picture-word consistency and the elaborative processing of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (November), 359-369.
HRC Media Index (2005). 한국리서치
Kardes, F. R. (1988). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: The effects of conclusion omission and involvement on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), 225 233.
Krishnan, B. C. & Hartline M. D. (2001). Brand equity: Is it more important in services?" Journal of Services Marketing, 15(5), 328-342.
Laurent, G. & Kapferer. J-N. (1985) Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (February), 41-53.
Lord, K. R. & Putrev, S. (1998). Communicating in print: Comparison of consumer responses to different promotional formats. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20 (2), 1-18.
Lutz, K. A. & Lutz, R. J. (1977) Effects of interactive imagery on learning: Application to advertising. Journal Applied Psychology, 62 (4), 493-498.
MacKenzie, S. B. (1986). The role of attention in mediating the effect of advertising on attribute importance. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (September), 174-195.
McQuarrie, E. F. & Phillips, B. J. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34 (2), 7-20.
McQuarrie, E. F. & Mick, D. G. (1992). The resonance: A critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (September), 180-197.
McQuarrie, E. F. & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (March), 424-438.
McQuarrie, E. F. & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (June), 37-54.
McQuarrie, E. F. & Mick, D. G. (2003). Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (March), 579-587.
Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., Lord, K. R., Dickson, P. R., & Unnava, H. R. (1991). Picture- based persuasion processes and the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (June), 92-107.
Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (June), 12-24.
Mittal, B. (1989). Measuring purchase-decision involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 6 (2), 147-162.
Moon, Y. S. & Franke, G. R. (1996). The changing information content of advertising: A longitudinal analysis of Korean magazine ads. Advances in International Marketing, 7, 129-144.
Morgan, S. E. & Reichert, E. (1999). The message is in the metaphor: Assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 28 (4), 1-12.
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2), 331-329.
Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4), 729-754.
Park, C. & Moon, B. (2003). The relationship between product involvement and product knowledge: Moderating roles of product type and product knowledge type. Psychology & Marketing, 20 (11), 977-997.
Phillips, B. J. (1997). Thinking into it: Consumer interpretation of complex advertising images. Journal of Advertising, 26 (2), 77-87.
Phillips, B. J. (2000). The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer response to image ads. Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 15-24.
Phillips, B. J. & McQuarrie, E. F. (2002). The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 31 (4), 1-13.
Phillips, B. J. & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4 (1/2), 113-136.
Shimp, T. A., Urbany, J. E., & Camlin, S. E. (1988). The use of framing and characterization for magazine advertising of mass-marketed products. Journal of Advertising, 17 (1), 23-30.
Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (May), 135-148.
Scott, L. M. (1994). The bridge from text to mind: Adapting reader-response theory to consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), 461-480.
Tom, G. & Eves, A. (1999). The use of rhetorical devices in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (4), 39-43.
Unnava, H. R. & Burnkrant, R. E. (1991). An imagery-processing view of the role of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (May), 226-231.
Vaughn, R. (1980). How advertising works: A planning model. Journal of Advertising Research, 20 (2), 27-33.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude," Journal of Marketing Research, XL (August), 310-320.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1987). The emotional aspect of product involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 32-35.