학교참여 다차원 구인에 대한 성별 및 학교급별 잠재평균분석
School Engagement as a Multidimensional Construct: Comparing the Latent Means Between Elementary and Middle School Students
염시창 (전남대학교)
초록
학교참여는 학업성취, 학교적응, 비행, 학교중도탈락 등을 예측하며, 환경 맥락변인과 학생 개인변인이 결과변인에 영향을 미치는 과정에서 매개변수로 작용한다. 이처럼 교육연구와 실제에서 중시되고 있는 학교참여가 정서적, 행동적, 인지적 참여로 구성된 다차원 구인인지를 확인하고, 중학교 진학 이후에 학교참여의 수준이 어떻게 달라지는지를 살펴보기 위하여 이 연구를 수행하였다. 초등학교 5, 6학년 599명과 중학교 1, 2학년 573명(총 1,172명)에게 Wang, Willett와 Eccles(2011)의 학교참여척도를 실시하여 수집한 자료에 확인적 요인분석과 잠재평균분석을 실행하였다. 분석 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 학교참여의 다차원적 요인구조를 확인하기 위하여 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 성별 및 학교급에 따라 구분된 4집단(초등학교 남학생, 초등학교 여학생, 중학교 남학생, 중학교 여학생) 모두에서 3요인 모형의 적합도가 1요인 모형이나 2요인 모형보다 양호한 것으로 판명되어 학교참여 요인구조의 형태동일성이 지지되었다. 둘째, 4집단에서 학교참여 요인별 요인계수가 동일하다고 가정한 측정동일성 모형이 수락되었다. 셋째, 각 성별 집단에서 초등학생과 중학생간 학교참여 요인별 잠재평균을 비교하기 위한 전제조건이 되는 절편동일성과 요인분산동일성이 충족되었다. 이에 집단간 잠재평균을 비교한 결과, 남녀 각 집단에서 중학생의 정서적, 행동적, 인지적 참여 수준이 초등학생보다 낮았다. 잠재평균 차이의 효과크기에 근거해 볼 때, 초등학생의 학교참여 수준과 중학생의 학교참여 수준 간 차이가 정서적 참여 요인에서 가장 컸고, 이러한 차이가 남학생 집단보다 여학생 집단에서 더 큰 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 학교참여의 3요인이 조합을 이루는 학교참여 양식을 확인하고 이에 적절한 학교심리개입을 제공하며 학교참여 메타구인을 2차 요인으로 설정한 ‘2차 요인 모형’을 검증할 필요성에 대해 논의하였다.
- keywords
- 학교참여, 다차원 구인, 측정동일성, 잠재평균분석, school engagement, multidimensional construct, measurement invariance, latent mean analysis
Abstract
School engagement as a multidimensional construct has been known not only as a predictor of academic achievement, school adjustment, and school dropout but also as a mediator in the relations between school/family context or personal variables and adjustment outcomes. This study was conducted to test the fit of a multidimensional model of school engagement consisting of three factors (i.e., affective, behavioral, cognitive) and examine the decreasing tendency of school engagement during the transition to middle school. Wang, Willett, and Eccles’s (2011) school engagement measures were administered to 1,172 students in Grades 5 to 8. Confirmatory factor analyses and latent mean analyses were conducted to examine research questions. First, confirmatory factor analyses revealed that, in all of the four groups (i.e., elementary school boys, elementary school girls, middle school boys, middle school girls), the three-factor model of school engagement fit the data better than the one-factor model and the two-factor model. Second, the four groups did not significantly differ in the composition of the three factors and factor loadings. Third, there were no significant differences in the intercepts of the observed variables between elementary and middle school students in each gender. Given that both factor loadings and intercepts were invariant, latent mean analyses were conducted to test the latent mean differences on affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement. Both boys and girls showed a significant decrease in each factor of school engagement. The effect sizes of latent mean differences on each factor by gender and school level showed that after the transition to middle school affective engagement declined to a greater extent than did behavioral and cognitive engagement and the three factors of school engagement decreased to a greater extent for girls than for boys. Finally, the necessity of identifying school engagement styles and testing the second-order model with one second-order factor (i.e., school engagement as a meta construct) and several first-order factors (e.g., affective, behavioral, cognitive engagement) was discussed.
- keywords
- 학교참여, 다차원 구인, 측정동일성, 잠재평균분석, school engagement, multidimensional construct, measurement invariance, latent mean analysis
참고문헌
김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식으로 논문쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
석임복, 강이철 (2007). Csikszentmihalyi의 몰입요소에 근거한 학습몰입척도의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 교육공학연구, 23(1), 121-154.
신현숙 (2009). 중학생이 지각한 수업환경, 학업촉진자, 학업기술, 학업성취의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 6(3), 291-311.
유순화 (2007). 초등학교에서 중학교로의 전환에 관한 학생들의 기대와 지각. 초등교육연구, 20(1), 355-375.
정현희 (1997). 중학교 진학에 대한 심리적 적응에 있어서의 성차에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 2(1), 75-88.
정현희 (2003). 중학교 진학 후의 심리적 적응변화를 예측하는 요인. 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집, pp.431-432. 8월 21일. 서울: 연세대학교 상경관.
Ainley, M. D. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 395-405.
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70, 87-107.
Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131-147.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
Betts, J. E., Appleton, J. J., Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the student engagement instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 84-93.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of secondorder factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471-491.
Fall, A., & Roberts, G. (2012). High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 787-798.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Frydenberg, E., Ainley, M., & Russell, V. J. (2005). Schooling issues digest: Student motivation and engagement. Retrieved July 27, 2013, from http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/ schoolingissuesdigestmotivationandengagement.p df
Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019-1041.
Griffiths, A., Sharkey, J. D., & Furlong, M. J. (2009). Student engagement and positive school adaptation. In R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp.197-211). New York: Routledge.
Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 57-79.
Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M-K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 636-654.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Janosz, M., Archambault, I., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. S. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 21-40.
Jennings, G. (2003). An exploration of meaningful participation and caring relationships as contexts for school engagement. The California School Psychologist, 8, 43-51.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Lam, S-f., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., et al. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77-94.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2013). Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 20-32.
Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school environment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 801-815.
Li, Y., Zhang, W., Liu, J., Arbeit, M. R., Schwartz, S. J., Bowers, E. P., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). The role of school engagement in preventing adolescent delinquency and substance use: A survival analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 1181-1192.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153-184.
Martinez, R. S., Aricak, O. T., Graves, M. N., Peters-Myszak, J., & Nellis, L. (2011). Changes in perceived social support and socioemotional adjustment across the elementary to junior high school transition. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 40, 519-530.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harrassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 151-163.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 700-712.
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 443-471.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176.
Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41(1), 3-25.
Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Lehr, C. A., & Anderson, A. R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from Check & Connect longitudinal studies. The California School Psychologist, 8, 29-41.
Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 204-319.
Wang, M., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662.
Wang, M., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 465-480.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565.
You, S., & Sharkey, J. (2009). Testing a developmental-ecological model of student engagement: A multilevel latent growth curve analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(6), 659-684.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수