바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

메뉴

Identifying Latent Classes in Adolescent's Self-Determination Motivation and Testing Determinants of Classes

Abstract

The present study classified groups based on latent profile of self-determination motivation(amotivation,external motivation, intrinsic motivation), and examined the determinants for each group. The data wascollected through panel data of Korea Education Longitudinal Study(KELS), total 5,459 participants whoanswered questionnaires of self-determination motivation of two times both second grade of middle schooland second grade of high school. To identify the change motivational type, standardized residual wasconducted using SPSS 17.0., and the latent classes for the change of motivational type was investigatedusing M-Plus in the frame work of Latent Profile Analysis(LPA). The results indicated that fivegroups(increase of self-determination, self-determination maintenance, self-determination developmental delay,elf-determination confusion, decrease of self-determination group) were classified based on latent profile. Inaddition, parental control, academic self-concept, teacher-student relationship, test anxiety, avoidanceorientation, gender, father's education, and income were significantly related to each group. Lastly, theimplications for directions of the adolescent counseling, limitations and future research are discussed.

keywords
자기결정성 동기, 잠재프로파일분석(LPA), 종단연구, self-determination motivation, Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), longitudinal study

Reference

1.

강민철, 조현주, 이종선 (2013). 우울, 불안, 수치심, 자살사고에 대한 잠재프로파일분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료. 25(4), 873-896.

2.

김동일, 이윤희, 김영근, 강민철 (2013). 청소년인터넷중독 위험군에 대한 잠재집단 프로파일 분석. 상담학연구, 14(4), 2143-2162.

3.

김동현 (2006). 아동의 낙관성과 학습동기와의관계. 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

김민성, 신택수, 허유성 (2012). 중고등학교 시기 교사-학생관계, 교우관계의 종단적 변화가 자기결정성에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 26(2), 429-459.

5.

김아영 (2003). 교실에서의 동기. 교육심리연구, 17(1), 5-36.

6.

김아영, 오순애 (2001). 자기결정성 정도에 따른 동기유형의 분류. 교육심리연구, 15(4), 97-119.

7.

김은주 (2007). 부모자녀관계와 자기결정성 요인들이 대학신입생들의 학교생활 만족도에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 21(3), 539-555.

8.

김은주, 도승이 (2009). 협동학습에서 학습자의유능감 및 관계성 욕구와 내재동기 및 수업참여의 관계 분석. 교육심리연구, 23(1), 181-196.

9.

노언경, 홍세희 (2012). 청소년의 컴퓨터 사용목적에 따른 잠재프로파일 분류 및 관련변인들의 영향력 검증. 한국청소년연구, 23(3), 51-76.

10.

박병기, 이종욱, 홍승표 (2005). 자기결정성 이론이 제안한 학습동기 분류형태의 재구성. 교육심리연구, 19(3), 699-717.

11.

서은희, 김은경 (2013). 자기결정성동기 프로파일에 따른 자기조절학습전략의 차이. 교육심리연구, 27(2), 395-407.

12.

손원숙 (2013). 고등학생 성취목표지향성 프로파일의 잠재전이분석. 교육평가연구, 26(4), 755-744.

13.

신종호, 진성조, 김연제 (2010). 지각된 부모의학업지원, 성취기대, 일상통제가 학업성취수준에 따라 자기결정성 동기에 미치는영향. 교육심리연구, 24(1), 121-137.

14.

우해봉, 윤인진 (2008). 불완전한 반복측정 자료의 보정방법. 조사연구, 9(2), 1-27.

15.

이명희, 김아영 (2008). 자기결정성이론에 근거한 한국형 기본심리욕구 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(4), 157-174.

16.

이은주a (2001). 몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지전략의 관계. 교육심리연구, 15, 199-216.

17.

이은주b (2013). 집단괴롭힘과 사회적 선호도의 관계의 다양성: 회귀혼합모델의 적용. 한국청소년연구, 24(2), 63-89.

18.

이주영, 오경자 (2010). 청소년기 우울-비행 공존 집단에 영향을 미치는 기질 및 성별의효과: 잠재 프로파일 분석의 적용. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(1), 53-72.

19.

임현정, 김양분, 김성식, 이규민 (2009). 한국교육종단연구2005(ⅴ). 한국교육과정평가원, RR2009-26.

20.

전성희, 신 미, 유미숙 (2011). 청소년의 자기결정성에 영향을 주는 요인들. 청소년학연구, 18(1), 275-296.

21.

조윤정 (2010). 청소년의 긍정적 사고가 성취동기와 스트레스 대처 방식에 미치는 영향. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

22.

조한익, 권혜연 (2010). 청소년의 자기결정성학습동기와 학업성취의 관계. 청소년학연구, 17, 47-68.

23.

조한익, 황정은 (2012). 중학생이 지각한 부모의 양육태도와 자기결정성 학습동기 간의관계: 정서경험의 매개효과를 중심으로. 청소년학연구, 19(4), 27-52.

24.

조현철 (2011). 내외적 학습동기, 자기결정성, 목표지향, 자기지각, 지능관 및 자기조절학습전략 요인들의 학습태도, 학습행동및 학업성취에 대한 효과. 교육심리연구, 25(1), 33-60.

25.

최병연, 유경훈 (2010). 초등학생의 자기결정성동기, 자기조절학습, 학업성취 간의 구조분석. 교육문화연구, 16, 183-203.

26.

하정희 (2007). 스트레스 지각과 부정정서와의관계: 완벽주의와 인지적 평가의 매개효과. 상담학연구, 8(4), 1573-1592.

27.

한순미 (2004). 학습동기 변인들과 인지전략및 학업성취 간의 관계. 교육심리연구, 18, 329-350.

28.

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.

29.

Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher automony-support in Russian and U. S. adolescent: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, 618-635.

30.

Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115.

31.

Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580-590.

32.

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.

33.

Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257-274.

34.

Frodi, A., Bridges, L., & Grolnick, W. (1985). Correlates of mastery-related behavior: A short-term longitudinal study of infants in their second year. Child Development, 56(5), 1291-1298.

35.

Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Social context, students' motivation, and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 211-233.

36.

Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 644-653.

37.

Harackiewicz, J. D. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352-1363.

38.

Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 98-108.

39.

Hipp J., & Bauer D. (2006). Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 11, 36-53.

40.

Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16, 39-59.

41.

Kruglanski, A. W., Riter, A., Amitai, A, Margolin, B-S, Shabtai, L., & Zaksh, D. (1975). Can money enhance intrinsic motivation? A test of the content-consequence hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 744-750.

42.

Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification hypothesis”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137.

43.

Little, R. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202

44.

Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 8, 767-778.

45.

Merz, E., & Roesch, S. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915-919.

46.

Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.

47.

McCrae, J. S., Champman, M. V., & Christ, S. L. (2006) Profile of children investigated for sexual abuse: Association with psychopathology symptoms and services. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(4), 468~481.

48.

McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley.

49.

Miller, H. A., Turner, K., & Henderson, C. E. (2009) Psychopathology of sex offenders: a comparison of males and females using latent profile analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 778~793.

50.

Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203-214.

51.

Morin, A. J. S., Madore, I., Morizot, J., Boudrias, J. -S., & Tremblay, M. (2009). Multiple Targets of workplace affective commitment:Factor structure and measurement invariance of the workplace affective commitment multidimensional questionnaire. Advances in Psychology Research, 59, 45-75.

52.

Murcia, J. A., Gimneno, E. C., & Coll, D. G-Z. (2007). Young athletes' motivational profiles. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine, 6, 172-179.

53.

Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social science (pp. 345-368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

54.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus, Los Angeles, CA: Muthén, & Muthén.

55.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2007). Mplus User's Guide (5th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén, & Muthén.

56.

Pastor, D., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L., (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8-47.

57.

Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163.

58.

Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senecal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-motivated analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734-746.

59.

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218.

60.

Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C, & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165-185.

61.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization:Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.

62.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologists, 55, 68-78.

63.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overveiw of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 3-33). The University of Rochester Press.

64.

Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.

65.

Sclove, L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343.

66.

Smith, P., & Beaton, D. (2008). Measuring change in psychosocial working conditions:Methodological issues to consider when data are collected at baseline and one follow-up time point. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65(4), 288-295.

67.

Stoolmiller, M. Kim, H. K., & Capaldi, D. M. (2005). The course of depressive symptoms in men from early adolescence to young adulthood: Identifying latent trajectories and early predictors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 331-345.

68.

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of selfdetermination in three life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604.

69.

Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high-school drop out. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.

70.

Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468-483.

Korean Journal of School Psychology