- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Sensitive determination of pendimethalin and dinoseb in environmental water by ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2017, v.30 no.4, pp.194-204
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2017.30.4.194
&
(2017). Sensitive determination of pendimethalin and dinoseb in environmental water by ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Science and Technology, 30(4), 194-204, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2017.30.4.194
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Direct injection (DI) and solid phase extraction (SPE) methods for the simultaneous determination of pendimethalin (PDM) and dinoseb (DNS) in environmental water have been optimized using the ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) method. The limits of quantification (LOQs) of PDM and DNS were 0.01 μg/L using the DI method and 0.0001-0.0002 μg/L using the SPE method. The precision by SPE UPLC-MS/MS was less than 11 % for intra-day and inter–day analyses. When the proposed SPE method was used to analyze two analytes in environmental water, PDM was detected in a concentration range of 0.0002-0.011 μg/L in 31 samples of the 114 surface water samples, and DNS was detected in a concentration range of 0.0005-0.045 μg/L in 17 samples of the 114 surface water samples analyzed. When the DI method was used to analyze target compounds in the same samples, the detected concentrations of the two analytes were within 21% in samples with concentrations above 0.01 μg/L. The DI UPLC–MS/ MS method can thus be used for the routine monitoring of PDM and DNS in environmental water, and the SPE LC–MS/MS method can be used for the determination of the ultra-trace PDM and DNS residues in environmental water.
- keywords
- pendimethalin, dinoseb, ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, direct injection, environmental water
Reference
1
1. Extention Toxicology Network (EXTOXNET), Pesticide Information Profile, Available online at http://extoxnet. orst.edu/pips/ghindex.html.
2
2. P. W. M. Augustijn-Beckers, A. G. Hornsby, and R. D. Wauchope, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 137, 1-82(1994).
3
3. C. MacBean, The Pesticide Manual 16 th (British Crop Production Council, United Kingdom, 2012). Available online at http://bcpcdata.com/_assets/files/PM16-supplementary-BCPC.pdf.
4
4. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), National primary drinking water regulations, EPA 822-R-03-005 (Office of Water, Washington DC, 1998). Available online at http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/#List.
5
5. WHO (World Health Organization), Pendimethalin in drinking-water, Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, (WHO, Geneva, 2003). Available online at http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/pendimethalin. pdf.
6
6. European Council, Drinking Water Guidelines, Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption, (European Council, Brussels, 1998). Available online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31998L0083.
7
7. UBA (Umweltbundesamt) ETOX, Information System Ecotoxicology and Environmental Quality Targets database, (Germany Umweltbundesamt, Sachsen anhalt). Available online at http://webetox.uba.de/webETOX/public/search/ziel/open.do?language=en&language=de.
8
8. B. Zhang, X. Pan, L. Venne, S. Dunnum, S. T. McMurry, G. P. Cobb, and T. A. Anderson, Talanta, 75, 1055-1060(2008).
9
9. J. L. Tadeo, J. Castro, and C. Sánchez-Brunete, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 84, 29-37 (2004).
10
10. V. I. Valsamaki, V. A. Sakkas, and T. A. Albanis, J. Sep. Sci., 30, 1936-1946 (2007).
11
11. L. L. Freitas, E. S. Sant’Anna, E. A. Suchara, V. S. Benato, and E. Carasek, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 92, 313-323 (2012).
12
12. J. Engebretson, G. Hall, M. Hengel, and T. Shibamoto, J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 2198-2206 (2001).
13
13. N. L. Calvez, L. Bodineau, and J. C. Fischer, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 82, 691-703 (2002).
14
14. M. J. Wells and L. Z. Yu, J. Chromatogr. A, 885, 237-250 (2000).
15
15. M. Marković, S. Cupac, R. Durovic, J. Milinovic, and P. Kljajic, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 58, 341-351(2010).
16
16. C. Goncalves, J. J. Carvalho, M. A. Azenha, and M. F. Alpendurada, J. Chromatogr. A, 1110, 6-14 (2006).
17
17. C. Goncalves and M. F. Alpendurada, Talanta, 65, 1179-1189 (2005).
18
18. A. Penetra, V. Vale Cardoso, E. Ferreira, and M. J. Benoliel, Water Sci., 62, 667-675 (2010).
19
19. M. C. Bruzzoniti, C. Sarzanini, G. Costantino, and M. Fungi, Anal. Chim. Acta, 578, 241-249 (2006).
20
20. A. Tanabe, H. Mitobe, K. Kawata, and M. Sakai, J. Chromatogr. A, 754, 159-168 (1996).
21
21. W. E. Johnson, N. J. Fendinger, and J. R. Plimmer, Anal. Chem., 63, 1510-1513 (1991).
22
22. A. Ranz and E. Lankmayr, J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 69, 3-14 (2006).
23
23. J. Nolte, B. Grass, F. Heimlich, and D. Klockow, Fresen. J. Anal. Chem., 357, 763-767 (1997).
24
24. L. Bartolomé, J. Lezamiz, N. Etxebarria, O. Zuloaga and J. A. Jönsson, J. Sep. Sci., 30, 2144-2152 (2007).
25
25. J. Shah, M. R. Jan, F. U. Shehzad and B. Ara, Environ. Monit. Assess., 175, 103-108 (2011).
26
26. P. Cabras, M. Melis, L. Spanedda, and C. Tuberoso, J. Chromatogr., 585, 164-167 (1991).
27
27. K. P. Prousalis, C. K. Kaltsonoudis, and T. Tsegenidis, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 86, 33-43 (2006).
28
28. G. Fernandez-Salinero, M. E. Silva-Vargas, M. E. Leon-Gonzalez, L.V. Pérez-Arribas, and L. M. Polo-Díez, J. Chromatogr. A, 839, 227-232 (1999).
29
29. P. R. Loconto, J. Liq. Chrom., 14, 1297-1314 (1991).
30
30. M. C. Jecklin, G. Gamez, D. Touboul, and R. Zenobi, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22, 2791-2798 (2008).
31
31. G. Perchet, G. Merlina, J. C. Revel, M. Hafidi, C. Richard, and E. Pinelli, J. Hazard. Mater., 166, 284-290(2009).
32
32. K. Takahashi, R. Ishii, S. Nemoto, and R. Matsuda, J. Food Hyg. Soc. Japan, 54, 1-6 (2013).
Other articles from this issue
- Effect of particle size of TiO2 and octyl-methoxycinnamate (OMC) content on sun protection factor (SPF)
- Do-It-Yourself (DIY) manufacture of a Nano-LC MALDI spotter robot using 3D printing technology
- Analysis of fatty acid methyl ester in bio-liquid by hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction
- Variation in chemical composition of Asian dusts on Jeju Island related to their inflow pathways during 2010-2015
- Sensitive determination of pendimethalin and dinoseb in environmental water by ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
- Quantitative comparison of acidic polysaccharides in the endosperm of two major varieties of rice
- Temperature-dependent studies on catalytic hydrosilation of polyalkylsiloxane using NMR
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.