- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Quantitative comparison of acidic polysaccharides in the endosperm of two major varieties of rice
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2017, v.30 no.4, pp.205-212
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2017.30.4.205
&
(2017). Quantitative comparison of acidic polysaccharides in the endosperm of two major varieties of rice. Analytical Science and Technology, 30(4), 205-212, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2017.30.4.205
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Rice endosperm, the portion that remains after milling, is the part of the rice seed that is primarily consumed as a source of nutrients. There have been many studies on polysaccharides, such as hemicellulose, cellulose, and pectins, derived from the cell walls of various plant groups. It has been reported that the acidic polysaccharide fractions, which contain water-soluble pectins that have been shown to have pharmacological effects in vivo and in vitro, have common chemical structures that include galacturonic acid polymers, rhamnose, arabinose, and galactose. However, few studies have been conducted on the acidic polysaccharides contained in the endosperm of rice. In this study, we quantitatively compared the differences in the acidic polysaccharide contents from samples from two of the main varieties of rice consumed as staple foods, japonica and indica, using a colorimetric method. Rice samples were collected from 39 different regions in Korea, China, Thailand and Vietnam. Acidic polysaccharide fractions were obtained by precipitation of the alcohol-insoluble residue (AIR) and enzyme treatment of each sample. The total amount of carbohydrates and uronic acid in each acidic polysaccharide fraction were measured using the phenol-sulfuric acid method and the carbazole-sulfuric acid method, respectively. The differences in the total polysaccharide contents in the acidic polysaccharide fractions were not statistically significant (p = 0.07), but the uronic acid contents were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.04).
- keywords
- rice endosperm, acidic polysaccharide, pectin, japonica rice, indica rice, colorimetric quantification
Reference
1
1. ‘Consensus Document on the Biology of Oryza Sativa (rice)’, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999.
2
2. D. Normile, Science, 275(5298), 309-309 (1997).
3
3. S. Muthayya, J. D. Sugimoto, S. Montgomery, and G. F. Maberly, Ann N Y Acad Sci., 1324, 7-14 (2014).
4
4. G. S. Khush, In ‘Oryza: From Molecule to Plant’, pp 25-34, T. Sasaki, and G. Moore, Eds., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1997.
5
5. O. A. Olsen, ‘Endosperm: Developmental and MolecularBiology’, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
6
6. S. C. Zeeman, J. Kossmann, and A. M. Smith, Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol., 61(1), 209-234 (2010).
7
7. B. Svihus, A. K. Uhlen, and O. M. Harstad, Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech., 122(3-4), 303-320 (2005).
8
8. R. Hoover, Carbohydrate Polymers, 45(3), 253-267(2001).
9
9. M. C. Sweedman, M. J. Tizzotti, C. Schäfer, and R. G. Gilbert, Carbohydrate Polymers, 92(1), 905-920 (2013).
10
10. A. A. Wani, P. Singh, M. A. Shah, U. Schweiggert-Weisz, K. Gul, and I. A. Wani, Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech., 11(5), 417-436 (2012).
11
11. L. Copeland, J. Blazek, H. Salman, and M. C. Tang, Food Hydrocolloids, 23(6), 1527-1534 (2009).
12
12. N. Shibuya and T. Iwasaki, Agric. Biol. Chem., 42(12), 2259-2266 (2014).
13
13. M. Ochoa-Villarreal, E. Aispuro-Hernández, I. Vargas-Arispuro, and M. Á. Martínez-Téllez, In ‘Polymerization’, p Ch. 04, A. D. S. Gomes, Ed., InTech, Rijeka, 2012.
14
14. N. C. Carpita and D. M. Gibeaut, The Plant Journal :for Cell and Molecular Biology, 3(1), 1-30 (1993).
15
15. T. Yamagishi, T. Tsuboi, and K. Kikuchi, Cereal Chemistry Journal, 80(1), 5-8 (2003).
16
16. X.-Q. Zha, J.-H. Wang, X.-F. Yang, H. Liang, L.-L. Zhao, S.-H. Bao, J.-P. Luo, Y.-Y. Xu, and B.-B. Zhou, Carbohydrate Polymers, 78(3), 570-575 (2009).
17
17. M. Takeshita, S. Nakamura, F. Makita, S. Ohwada, Y. Miyamoto, and Y. Morishita, Biotherapy (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 4(2), 139-45 (1992).
18
18. J.-Y. Shin, J.-Y. Song, Y.-S. Yun, H.-O. Yang, D.-K. Rhee, and S. Pyo, Immunopharm. Immunot., 24(3), 469-482 (2002).
19
19. K.-H. Kim, Y.-S. Lee, I.-S. Jung, S.-Y. Park, H.-Y. Chung, I.-R. Lee, and Y.-S. Yun, Planta Med, 64(02), 110-115 (1998).
20
20. Y. S. Kim, K. S. Kang, and S. I. Kim, Arch. Pharm. Res., 13(4), 330-337 (1990).
21
21. X. F. Du, C. Z. Jiang, C. F. Wu, E. K. Won, and S. Y. Choung, Arch. Pharm. Res., 31(9), 1153-1159 (2008).
22
22. J.-H. Lee, J. S. Shim, J. S. Lee, M.-K. Kim, M.-S. Chung, and K. H. Kim, Carbohyd. Res., 341(9), 1154-1163(2006).
23
23. J. Wang, S. Li, Y. Fan, Y. Chen, D. Liu, H. Cheng, X. Gao, and Y. Zhou, J. Ethnopharmacol., 130(2), 421-423(2010).
24
24. Y.-S. Kwak, J.-S. Kyung, J. S. Kim, J. Y. Cho, and M.-H. Rhee, Biol. Pharm. Bull., 33(3), 468-472 (2010).
25
25. X. Zhang, L. Yu, H. Bi, X. Li, W. Ni, H. Han, N. Li, B. Wang, Y. Zhou, and G. Tai, Carbohyd. Res., 77(3), 544-552 (2009).
26
26. N. Shibuya and R. Nakane, Phytochemistry, 23(7), 1425-1429 (1984).
27
27. B. L. Ridley, M. A. O'Neill, and D. Mohnen, Phytochemistry, 57(6), 929-967 (2001).
28
28. R. R. Selvendran and M. A. O'Neill, Methods. Biochem. Anal., 32, 25-153 (1987).
29
29. K. H. Caffall and D. Mohnen, Carbohyd. Res., 344(14), 1879-1900 (2009).
30
30. Z. A. Popper and S. C. Fry, Planta, 227(4), 781-794(2008).
31
31. W. S. York, V. S. K. Kolli, R. Orlando, P. Albersheim, and A. G. Darvill, Carbohyd. Res., 285, 99-128 (1996).
32
32. K. A. Garleb, L. D. Bourquin, and G. C. Fahey, J. Food Sci., 56(2), 423-426 (1991).
33
33. M. A. Coimbra, A. Barros, M. Barros, D. N. Rutledge, and I. Delgadillo, Carbohyd. Res., 37(3), 241-248 (1998).
34
34. K. A. C. C. Taylor, Appl. Biochem. Biotech., 43(1), 51-54 (1993).
35
35. F. A. Pettolino, C. Walsh, G. B. Fincher, and A. Bacic, Nat. Protoc., 7(9), 1590-607 (2012).
36
36. L. E. Bartley, M. L. Peck, S. R. Kim, B. Ebert, C. Manisseri, D. M. Chiniquy, R. Sykes, L. Gao, C. Rautengarten, M. E. Vega-Sanchez, P. I. Benke, P. E. Canlas, P. Cao, S. Brewer, F. Lin, W. L. Smith, X. Zhang, J. D. Keasling, R. E. Jentoff, S. B. Foster, J. Zhou, A. Ziebell, G. An, H. V. Scheller, and P. C. Ronald, Plant Physiol, 161(4), 1615-33 (2013).
37
37. T. Masuko, A. Minami, N. Iwasaki, T. Majima, S.-I. Nishimura, and Y. C. Lee, Anal. Biochem., 339(1), 69-72 (2005).
38
38. K. Zhao, C.-W. Tung, G. C. Eizenga, M. H. Wright, M. L. Ali, A. H. Price, G. J. Norton, M. R. Islam, A. Reynolds, J. Mezey, A. M. McClung, C. D. Bustamante, and S. R. McCouch, 2, 467 (2011).
Other articles from this issue
- Effect of particle size of TiO2 and octyl-methoxycinnamate (OMC) content on sun protection factor (SPF)
- Do-It-Yourself (DIY) manufacture of a Nano-LC MALDI spotter robot using 3D printing technology
- Analysis of fatty acid methyl ester in bio-liquid by hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction
- Variation in chemical composition of Asian dusts on Jeju Island related to their inflow pathways during 2010-2015
- Sensitive determination of pendimethalin and dinoseb in environmental water by ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
- Quantitative comparison of acidic polysaccharides in the endosperm of two major varieties of rice
- Temperature-dependent studies on catalytic hydrosilation of polyalkylsiloxane using NMR
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.