Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

    A study on the distribution of latent fingerprints on paper knife sheaths

    Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
    2021, v.34 no.6, pp.251-258
    https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2021.34.6.251




    • Downloaded
    • Viewed

    Abstract

    Knives are most frequently used as weapons in violent crimes. Criminals leave behind knife sheaths made of paper and tape at crime scenes. It is difficult to develop fingerprints using tape attached to a porous surface, resulting in the need to explore effective techniques for identifying fingerprints as well as the distribution of fingerprints on each surface, when evidence such as paper knife sheaths are found. In this study, 50 knife sheaths were prepared. The cyanoacrylate fuming (CA fuming) method was applied to develop fingerprints on the non-adhesive side of the tape, and a dual-purpose 1,2-indanedione/Zn (1,2-IND/Zn) reagent was used to separate tape from paper while simultaneously developing fingerprints on the paper. The fingerprints on the adhesive side of the tape were developed using Wet Powder Black®. Using the R statistical analysis program (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing), we used a heat map to indicate the location of fingerprints developed from each surface. More fingerprints were detected at the ends than in the center of the adhesive side of the tape, and although the non-adhesive sides of tape and paper did not present clear distribution patterns, many fingerprints were developed that had sufficient clarity for personal identification. The results of this study may be applicable for processing evidence when paper sheaths are found at crime scenes.

    keywords
    knife sheath, fingerprint, distribution, heatmap


    Reference

    1

    1. Korean National Police Agency, https://www.police.go. kr/www/open/publice/publice03_2019.jsp, Assessed 11July 2021.

    2

    2. M. Y. Choudhry and R. D. Whritenour, J. Forensic Sci., 35, 1373-1383 (1990).

    3

    3. H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, ‘Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in Fingerprint Technology’, 3rd Ed., CRC press, Boca Raton, 2013.

    4

    4. S. Bleay, V. Sears, R. Downham, H. Bandey, V. Bowman, L. Fitzgerald, T. Ciuksza and C. Selway, ‘Fingerprint Source Book v2.0’, 2nd Ed., Home Office, London, 2017.

    5

    5. H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, ‘Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in Fingerprint Technology’, 3rd Ed., CRC press, Boca Raton, 2013.

    6

    6. D. B. Hauza, O. Petrovskaia, B. Taylor, M. M. Joullie, R. Ramotowski and A. A. Cantu, J. Forensic Sci., 43(4), 744-747 (1998).

    7

    7. A. Luscombe and V. Sears, Forensic Sci. Int., 292, 254-261 (2018).

    8

    8. V. D'Elia, S. Materazzi, G. Iuliano and L. Niola, Forensic Sci. Int., 254, 205-214 (2015).

    9

    9. Y. H. Seo, Y. J. Kim, M. S. Shin and J. S. Yu, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(1), 463-471 (2019).

    10

    10. A. de Ronde, M. van Aken, C. J. de Poot and M. de Puit, Forensic Sci. Int., 315 (2020).

    11

    11. International Fingerprint Research Group(IFRG), J. Forensic Identif., 64(2), 174-197 (2014).

    12

    12. C. Champod, C. J. Lennard, P. Margot and M. Stoilovic, ‘Fingerprints and other ridge skin impressions’, 2nd Ed., p107-108, CRC press, Boca Raton, 2017.

    13

    13. C. Champod, Forensic Sci. Int., 45(2), 136-163 (1995).

    상단으로 이동

    Analytical Science and Technology