바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

‘딸바보’ 시대의 여성혐오 - 아버지 상(father figure)의 변모를 통해 살펴 본 2000년대 한국의 남성성

Misogyny in the Era of ‘Daughter-Fools’ - Korea’s Masculinity in the 2000s seen through the Transformation of the ‘Father Figure’

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2016, v.22 no.4, pp.279-309
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2016.22.4.008
허윤 (이화여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The biggest change seen in Korea’s popular culture in the 2010s is the increased exposure of fathers on TV. Variety shows increasingly introduced sub-programs featuring fathers and their children, and invited celebrity parents and their kids to appear on studio and reality shows. In particular, reality shows on celebrity parents raising their children were dubbed ‘child-raising variety show’ and gained immense popularity. Among public channels alone, MBC’s Dad, Where Are You Going? (2013-2015), KBS’ The Return of Superman(2013-present) were and are broadcasted under this category, these programs focus on featuring the relationship between the father and their children. ‘Daughter-fools’ infiltrated the public sphere starting from 2009. KBS’ evening wide show Live Tong chose ‘daughter-fool’ as the buzzword of 2010 on its broadcast on 29 December 2010 and announced the arrival of the new father figure. Casting off the hegemonic masculinity represented by strict fathers, ‘daughter-fool’ is the most positive image of masculinity to be recreated in Korean media since 2000. The expression is used by men to present themselves the ideal type of masculinity that does not shy away from housework and child care, and appear in Korean society as a post-modern figure that integrates modern masculinity and feminist sentimentality. However, Fathers experience for a limited time the difficulties mothers face on a daily basis while waiting impatiently for their wives to come back. Although the present society encourages fathers to take care of their children, the mother’s position is immutable. And the way ‘daddy shows’ reinforce the image of men as the protector and head of the family can also be found in the way the children are gendered. The over-protectiveness over daughters comes from gendering daughters as women. The daughter is identified as a ‘woman’ before as a human-being, and it is the same with daughters who have become adults. Before marriage, women are trapped under their father’s umbrella, and after marriage, they move under that of their husbands. At the bottom of this coexistence of ‘daughter-fools’ and misogyny in Korean society is male solidarity. Korean society is founded upon male solidarity based on the hegemonic masculinity.

keywords
‘딸바보’, 헤게모니적 남성성, 여성혐오, <슈퍼맨이 돌아왔다>, 'daughter-fools', hegemonic masculinity, mysogyny, The Return of Superman

참고문헌

1.

MBC <아빠, 어디가?> (2013~2015)

2.

KBS <슈퍼맨이 돌아왔다> (2013~현재)

3.

SBS <아빠를 부탁해> (2015)

4.

고예린, 「<말하는대로>, 모두에게 열려있는 거리의 어려움」, 『ize』, 2016.10.13.

5.

권김현영, 「민족주의 이념논쟁과 후기 식민 남성성」, 『문화과학』49, 2007, 39-54쪽.

6.

권김현영, 「병역의무와 근대적 국민정체성의 성별정치학」, 이화여대 석사학위논문, 2002.

7.

권상희 ‧조은정, 「TV 프로그램 장르별 의사사회 상호작용 차원에 관한 연구」, 『한국방송학보』23-2, 2009, 51-93쪽.

8.

권인숙, 「헤게모니적 남성성과 병역의무」, 『한국여성학』21-2, 2005, 223-253쪽.

9.

송제숙, 『혼자 살아가기』, 황성원 옮김, 동녘, 2016.

10.

여성가족부, 「2016 통계로 보는 여성의 삶」, 2016.

11.

여성가족부, 「기업 및 공공기관의 가족친화지수 측정」, 2015.

12.

윤보라 외, 『여성혐오가 어쨌다구?』, 현실문화연구, 2015.

13.

윤빛나, 「아빠 육아 리얼리티 프로그램을 통해 본 한국 사회의 남성성과 젠더 담론:KBS2 슈퍼맨이 돌아왔다의 수용자 해석을 중심으로」, 고려대 석사학위논문, 2015.

14.

이영미, 「김수현 드라마의 리얼리티와 균형감」, 『황해문화』 79, 2013, 312-319쪽.

15.

조윤경, 「‘아버지 자녀 양육서’에 내재한 젠더 질서: ‘아버지됨’과 ‘근대적 남성성’의 관계를 중심으로」, 『여성학연구』 22-1, 2012, 35-72쪽.

16.

조윤경, 「한국 사회의 구조적 변동과 아버지 양육의 변화」, 『한국융합인문학』 2-1, 2014, 83-112쪽.

17.

조준상 ‧은혜정, 「리얼리티 예능 프로그램 연구」, 『언론과학연구』 13-3, 2013, 556-590쪽.

18.

최성민, 「대중 매체 텍스트의 리얼리티 문제 연구」, 『인문콘텐츠』 18, 2010, 125-146쪽.

19.

한경혜, 「아버지상의 변화」, 여성한국사회연구회, 『남성과 한국사회』, 사회문화연구소, 1997.

20.

R.W.코넬, 『남성성/들』, 안상욱 외 옮김, 이매진, 2013.

대중서사연구