바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Quantitative Comparisons of Soil Carbon and Nutrient Storage inLarix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigitaeda Plantations

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2004, v.27 no.2, pp.67-71


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate soil carbon and nutrient storage of three adjacent coniferous plantations (Larix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigitaeda) growing on a similar site with a same planting age (42-year old) in the Sambong Exhibition Forests, Hamyang-gun, Gyungsangnam-do. The soil carbon concentration among three plantations was not significantly different in 0∼10 cm soil depth, but other two depths (10∼20 cm and 20∼30 cm) showed higher carbon concentration in P. densiflora plantation than the other two plantations. The exchangeable cation concentrations (Ca and Mg) in 0∼10 cm depth were significantly lower in L. leptolepis plantation than in the other two plantations, while nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations were not significantly different among three plantations except for nitrogen at 10∼20 cm depth in P. rigitaeda plantation. Soil carbon storage in 0∼20 cm depth of three plantations was unaffected by the stand types. Soil nutrient storage was not significantly different at each depth except for nitrogen storage at 10∼20 cm depth in P. rigitaeda plantation because of the variation of bulk density and coarse fragment. This result demonstrates that soil carbon and nutrient concentrations among the plantations on a similar soil condition can be altered significantly by tree species effects over 40 years after plantation establishment.

keywords
Forest soils, Nutrient storage, Oraganic carbon, Soil property, Stand types

Reference

1.

(1992) Carbon storage in Lake Statesaspen ecosystems,

2.

(2000) Impacts of forest management on northernforest soils,

3.

(1995) The influence of tree specieson a acid deposition, proton budgets and element fluxes in south Swedish forest ecosystems,

4.

(1998) Why do tree species affect soils The warp and woof of tree-soil interaction,

5.

(2003) Change in soil carbon and nutrientstorage after human disturbance of a primary Korean pineforest in northeast China,

6.

(1999) Soil carbon and nutrients in a coastal OregonDouglas fir plantation with red alder,

7.

(2003) Carbon storagealong a stand development sequence in a New ZealandNothofagus forest,

8.

(1993) nutrient content and trace metals in soils undera low elevation spruce,

9.

(1994) Forest floor and soil nutrient statusunder Norway spruce and red pine in a plantation in southernQuebec,

10.

(1988) Estimatingsoil nitrogen and carbon pools in a northern hardwood forestecosystem,

11.

(1999) Aboveground nutrient distribution in pitch pine (Pinus rigida) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations.,

12.

(2001) Change of aboveground carbonstorage in Pinus rigida stand in Gwangnung in Korean with EnglishSummary,

13.

(1998) Soil organic carboncontent in forest soils of Korea in Korean with English Summary,

14.

(1999) Carbon dioxide reductionthrough urban forestry^USFS Genguideline for professional andvolunteer tree planters,

15.

(2000) National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology Methods of soil chemical and plant analysis, Sammi Press

16.

(1997) Soil nitrogen mineralization in adjacentstands of larch pine and oak in central Korea,

17.

(1992) Nitrogen and phosphorus distributionfor five plantation species in southwestern Wisconsin,

18.

(1991) A comparison of some methodsfor soil organic carbon determination,

19.

(2000) Land use, Land-use Change and Forestry, Cambridge University Press

20.

(2000) Elemental storage offorest soil from local to global scales,

Journal of Ecology and Environment