바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Feasibility of seed bank for restoration of salt marsh: a case study around the Gwangyang Bay, southern Korea

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2012, v.35 no.2, pp.123-129



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Salt marsh is an important transitional zone among terrestrial, riverine, and marine ecosystems and is a productive habitat that interacts extensively with adjacent landscape elements of estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Nowadays, in addition to various human activities, a variety of natural processes induce changes in salt marshes. This study aims to provide background information to restore disturbed salt marshes and to propose their ecological restoration using seed banks. The study area is a prepared area for the Gwangyang Container Port located in the southern Korea. This area was formed by accumulating mud soils dredged from the bottom of the forward sea. This land was created in a serial process of preparing the Gwangyang container port and the salt marsh was passively restored by seeds buried in mud soil dredged from seabed. As a result of stand ordination based on vegetation data collected from the land, stands were arranged according to tolerance to salinity in the order of Suaeda maritima, Salicornia europaea, and Phragmites communis communities on the Axis 1. Landscape structure of the projected area was analyzed as well. Edges of the projected area were divided from the marginal waterway by the dike. Four types of vegetation appeared on the dike: Alnus firma plantation, Robinia pseudoacacia plantation, Lespedeza cyrtobotrya plantation, and grassland. In the more internal areas, two types of vegetation sequences appeared: Aster tripolium community-Suaeda glauca community-Salicornia europaea community sequence and Aster tripolium community-Suaeda maritima community-S. europaea community sequence. Mixed community showed the highest species diversity (H′ = 0.86) and S. europaea community showed the lowest (H′ = 0.0). Evenness is the highest in Mixed community (J′ = 2.26) and the lowest in S. maritime-S. europaea community (J′ = 0.0). Several plant communities were successfully established on the land created by mud soil dredged from the bottom of Gwangyang Bay. Moreover, community diversity in this area approached a similar level with those from other studies involving natural salt marshes. Therefore, restoration effect based on community diversity obtained in our study can be evaluated as a successful achievement. In this respect, although most salt marshes in Korea and other places worldwide have been destroyed or disturbed by excessive land use, feasibility of seed bank as a restoration tool is greatly expected.

keywords
Gwangyang bay, halophyte, restoration, salt marsh, seed bank

Reference

1.

Augusto L, Dupouey JL, Picard JF, Ranger J. 2001. Potential contribution of the seed bank in coniferous plantations to the restoration of native deciduous forest vegetaion. Acta Oecol 22: 87-98.

2.

Bakker JP, Esselink P, Dojkema KS, van Duin WE, de Jong DJ. 2002. Restoration of salt marshes in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478: 29-51.

3.

Baskin JM, Baskin CC. 1980. Role of seed reserves in the persistence of a local population of Sedum pulchellum: a direct field observation. Bull Torrey Bot Club 107: 429-430.

4.

Bradshaw AD. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landsc Plann 11: 35-48.

5.

Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. 3rd ed. Springer, Wien.

6.

Chung CH, Zhuo RZ, Xu GW. 2004. Creation of Spartina plantations for reclaiming Dongtai, China, tidal flats and offshore sands. Ecol Eng 23: 135-150.

7.

Cox RD, Allen EB. 2008. Composition of soil seed banks in southern California coastal sage scrub and adjacent exotic grassland. Plant Ecol 198: 37-46.

8.

Doody JP. 2001. Coastal Conservation and Management: An Ecological Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

9.

Eisma D, de Boer PL, Cadėe GC. 1998. Intertidal Deposit: River Mouths, Tidal Flats, and Coastal Lagoons. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

10.

Environmental System Research Institute (ESRI). 1996. ArcView GIS. Environmental System Research Institute, Inc., New York.

11.

Fenner M. 1985. Seed Ecology. Champman & Hall, London.

12.

Grime JP. 1981. The role of seed dormancy in vegetation dynamics. Ann Appl Biol 98: 555-558.

13.

Grime JP. 1989. Seed banks in ecological perspective. In: Ecology of Soil Seed Banks (Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL, eds). Academic Press, London, pp 15-22.

14.

Han YU. 2008. The characteristics of halophyte vegetation of salt marshes in the southern and western coasts of Korea. Ms Thesis. Mokpo National University, Muan, Korea.

15.

Hill MO. 1979. DECORANA: A FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

16.

Hughes RG, Paramor OAL. 2004. On the loss of saltmarshes in south-east England and methods for their restoration. J Appl Ecol 41: 440-448.

17.

Ihm BS. 1989. Distribution of coastal plant communities in response to soil water potential and plant osmotic adjustment. PhD Dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)

18.

Ihm BS, Lee JS, Kim HS, Kwak AK, Ihm HB. 1995a. Adjustment of three halophyte to changes of NaCl concentrations. Bull Inst Litt Environ Mokpo Natil Univ 12: 1-10.

19.

Ihm BS, Lee JS, Kim HS, Kwak AK, Ihm HB. 1995b. Distribution of coastal plant communities at the salt marshes of Mankyung and Donjin River estuary. Bull Inst Litt Environ Mokpo Natl Univ 12: 11-28.

20.

Ihm BS, Lee JS, Kim JW, Kim HS, Ihm HB. 1998a. Studies on the vegetation at the wetland of Suncheon-Man. Bull Inst Litt Environ Mokpo Natl Univ 15: 1-8.

21.

Ihm BS, Lee JS, Kim JW, Kim HS, Ihm HB. 1998b. Studies on the vegetation distribution and biomass at the wetland of Hampyung-Man. Bull Ins Litt Environ Mokpo Natl Univ 15: 9-20.

22.

Kalisz S. 1990. Soil seed banks. Ecology 71: 1226-1227.

23.

Kim CH, Lee KB, Kim JD, Cho TD, Lim MS. 2005. The study on the flora and vegetation of salt marshes of Dongjin-river estuary in Jeonbuk. J Environ Sci 14: 817-825.

24.

Koh JH. 2007. A study on the potential contribution of soil seed bank to the revegetation. J Korean Environ Res Reveg Technol 10: 99-109.

25.

Lee JS. 1989. On establishment of halophytes along tidal level gradient at salt marshes of Mankyong and Donjin river estuaries. PhD Dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)

26.

Lee JS, Ihm BS, Myeong HH, Park JW, Kim HS. 2009. Soil environment analysis and habitat of halophyte for restoration in the salt marshes of southern and western coasts of Korea. Korean J Plant Res 22: 102-110.

27.

Lee JS, Kim JK. 1988. Factors affecting plant distribution in salt marsh of Mankyong river and Donjin river estuaries. Nat Sci Res Kunsan Natl Univ 3: 45-59.

28.

Lee SM. 2007. Secondary succession and seed bank structure of abandoned rice paddy field, and its restoration. Ms Thesis. Seoul Women’s University, Seoul, Korea.

29.

Lee SM, Cho YC, Shin HC, Oh WS, Seol ES, Park SA, Lee CS. 2008. Successional changes in seed banks in abandoned rice fields im Gwangneung, central Korea. J Ecol Field Biol. 31: 269-276.

30.

Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, New York.

31.

McCune B, Mefford MJ. 1999. PC-ORD, Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4. MjM Software Design, Glenden Beach, OR.

32.

Middleton B. 1999. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing, and Disturbance Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

33.

Ministry of Environment. 2006. Development of Ecological Conservation and Management Techniques of Halophyte Communities on Salt Marshes of Southwestern Coasts in Korea. Korea Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Seoul.

34.

Morton RD, Law R. 1997. Regional species pools and the assembly of local ecological communities. J Theor Biol 187: 321-331.

35.

National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

36.

Nottage A, Robertson P. 2005. The Saltmarsh Creation Handbook: A Project Manager’s Guide to the Creation of Saltmarsh and Intertidal Mudflat. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, Bedfordshire.

37.

Pielou EC. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13: 131-144.

38.

Richter R, Stromberg JC. 2005. Soil seed banks of two montane riparian areas: implications for restoration. Biodivers Conserv 14: 993-1016.

39.

Roberts HA. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Adv Appl Biol 6: 1-55.

40.

Roovers P, Bossuyt B, Igodt B, Hermy M. 2006. May seed banks contribute to vegetation restoration on paths in temperate deciduous forest? Plant Ecol 187: 25-38.

41.

Simpson RL, Leck MA, Parker VT. 1989. Seed banks: general concepts and methodological issues. In: Ecology of Soil Seed Banks (Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL, eds). Academic Press, London, pp 1-8.

42.

Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, AZ.

43.

Stanturf JA, Schoenholtz SH, Schweitzer CJ, Shepard JP. 2001. Achieving restoration success: myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Restor Ecol 9: 189-200.

44.

Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM. 1997. The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

45.

Toth LA. 1996. Restoring the hydrogeomorphology of the channelized Kissimmee River. In: River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects (Brookes A, Shields FD Jr, eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 369-383.

46.

Turner RE, Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL, Costanza R, Neill C, Sikora JP, Sikora WB, Swenson E. 1988. Wetlands hydrology and vegetation dynamics. Proceedings of the National Wetland Symposium: mitigation of impacts and losses, 1986 Oct 8-10, New Orleans, LA. Association of State Wetland Managers Berne, New York, pp 135-141.

47.

Wall DH, Palmer MA, Snelgrove PVR. 2001. Biodiversity in critical transition zones between terrestrial, freshwater, and marine soils sediments: processes, linkages, and management implications. Ecosystems 4: 418-420.

48.

Wang CH, Tang L, Fei SF, Wang JQ, Gao Y, Wang Q, Chen JK, Li B. 2009. Determinants of seed bank dynamics of two dominant helophytes in a tidal salt marsh. Ecol Eng 35: 800-809.

49.

White E, Tucker N, Meyers NM, Wilson J. 2004. Seed dispersal to revegetated isolated rainforest patches in North Queensland. For Ecol Manage 192: 409-426.

50.

Willems JH, Bik LPM. 1998. Restoration of high species density in calcareous grassland: the role of seed rain and soil seed bank. Appl Veg Sci 1: 91-100.

51.

Willson MF, Traveset A. 2000. The ecology of seed dispersal. In: Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities (Fenner M, ed). 2nd ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 85-110.

52.

Wolters M, Bakker JP. 2002. Soil seed bank and driftline composition along a successional gradient on a temperate salt marsh. Appl Veg Sci 5: 55-62.

53.

Yim YJ, Kira T. 1975. Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korean Peninsula I. Distribution of some indices of thermal climate. Jpn J Ecol 25: 77-88.

54.

Zhan X, Li L, Cheng W. 2007. Restoration of Stipa kryloviisteppes in inner Mongolia of China: assessment of seed banks and vegetation composition. J Arid Environ 68: 298-307.

55.

Zobel M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternarive explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol 12: 266-269.

56.

Zobel M, van der Maarel E, Dupré C. 1998. Species pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration. Appl Veg Sci 1: 55-66.

Journal of Ecology and Environment