The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) tools, especially significant Large Language Models like ChatGPT, into the
realm of research and manuscript creation is indeed noteworthy. To provide
clear directives, we offer the following comprehensive guidelines addressing
the interplay between AI and authorship, specifically tailored for submissions
to JISTaP.
These guidelines will be effective as of October
1, 2023. Authors are urged to adhere diligently to these guidelines when
submitting manuscripts to JISTaP. By doing so, we ensure transparent
documentation of AI's role while upholding ethical standards. As AI continues
to evolve, these guidelines will adapt to reflect the evolving landscape.
Acknowledging AI's Presence, Clarifying Authorship
AI as Authors: Recognizing AI's capabilities, it
is prudent to clarify that AI tools, including LLMs, DO NOT meet the criteria
for authorship. Thus, attributing authorship to AI tools is not appropriate and
should be avoided.
Distribution of Responsibilities: The scope of
authorship encompasses responsibilities that extend beyond AI's computational
prowess. These include intellectual contributions, conflict resolution, and
adherence to legal standards, aspects better suited to human authors.
Transparent Integration: Instances involving
substantive AI contributions to manuscript elements call for transparent
disclosure of AI's role in the process.
Crafting
Manuscripts in the Age of AI
Defining
AI's Role: Authors are encouraged
to articulate AI's role within the confines of the "Materials and
Methods" section, outlining specific contributions. Flexibility is
extended, allowing integration within contextual sections like the
introduction, if deemed appropriate.
Authorial
Responsibility: Despite AI's involvement,
human authors retain ultimate responsibility for content accuracy, originality,
and ethical integrity.
Acknowledging
AI's Contribution:
Manuscript submissions must duly acknowledge the utilization of AI tools.
Within the "Acknowledgments" section, provide acknowledgment of AI's
role, supplemented by a comprehensive explanation within the "Materials
and Methods" section.
Alignment with COPE Principles
In Tune with COPE: These guidelines align
seamlessly with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) standpoint. The
author remains the key arbiter of content, even in light of AI's collaborative
role.