바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Case Study on Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Applying Multiple Entities

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2010, v.10 no.2, pp.193-214
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2010.10.2.193

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The multiple entity data model which contains metadata that associate two or more entities is applied recordkeeping metadata standard in recent years. This paper described and analyzed the recordkeeping metadata standard applying multiple entities such as ISO 23081, Australia recordkeeping metadata Standard, New Zealand recordkeeping metadata Standard, New South Wales recordkeeping metadata Standard, Queensland recordkeeping metadata Standard recordkeeping metadata Standard, South Australia recordkeeping metadata Standard, focusing on scope, the number of entities, category in entity, metadata elements. And shows some examples of relationship entity which is the key of multiple entity. As a result of the analysis, this paper suggests some consideration when recordkeeping metadata standard applying multiple entities is revised.

keywords
recordkeeping metadata, multiple entity, conceptual model, multiple entity data model, relationship entity, ISO 23081-2, recordkeeping metadata, multiple entity, conceptual model, multiple entity data model, relationship entity, ISO 23081-2, 기록관리 메타데이터, 다중 개체, 개념적 모델, 다중 개체 모형, 관계 개체, 관계 메타데이터, ISO 23081-2

Reference

1.

곽정. (2007). 현용ㆍ준현용 단계의 기록관리를 위한 메타데이터. 기록학연구, (16호), 3-37.

2.

길도욱. (2005). 전자기록관리를 위한 레코드키핑 메타데이터요소 설계에 관한 연구.

3.

설문원. (2004). 행정기관의 기록관리 메타데이터 요소 분석 - ISO 15489를 기준으로 -. 한국비블리아학회지, 15(1), 217-242.

4.

설문원. (2005). 국가 기록관리 표준 정비의 방향. 한국기록관리학회지, 5(1), 137-169.

5.

이현실. (2006). 기록 관리 메타데이터의 개념 모델링. 정보관리학회지, 23(3), 23-48.

6.

천누리. (2010). 연구개발기록물의 메타데이터 요소에 관한 연구.

7.

한국기록관리학회. (2008). 기록학 용어사전:역사비평사.

8.

Archives New Zealand. (2008). Electronic Recordkeeping Metadata Standard. Technical Specifications for the Electronic Recordkeeping Metadata Standard.

9.

Cumming, Kate. (2007). Purposeful Data: The Roles and Purposes of Recordkeeping Metadata. Records Management Journal, 17(3), 186-2000.

10.

Cunningham, Adrian. (2001). Six Degrees of Separation: Australian Metadata Initiatives and Their Relationships with International Standards. Archival Science, 1, 271-283.

11.

Evans, Joanne. (2005). Create Once, Use Many Times: The Clever Use of Recordkeeping Metadata for Multiple Archival Purposes. Archival Science, 5(1), 17-42.

12.

Evans, Joanne. (2008). Interoperable Data: Sustainable Frameworks for Creating and Managing Recordkeeping Metadata. Records Management Journal, 18(2), 115-129.

13.

Evans, Joanne. (2009). Making Metadata Matter: Outcomes from the Clever Recordkeeping Metadata Project. Archives and Manuscrips, 37(1), 28-56.

14.

Hedstrom, Margaret. (2001). Recordkeeping Metadata. Presenting the Results of a Working Meeting. Archival Science, 1, 243-251.

15.

ISO 23081-1. Information and Documentation - Records Management Processes - Metadata for Records - Part 1: Principles.

16.

ISO 23081-2. Information and Documentation - Management Metadata for Records - Part 2: Conceptual and Implementation Issues.

17.

McKemmish, Sue. (1999). Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: the Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Archivaria, 48l, 3-43.

18.

National archives of Australia. Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Version 2.0.

19.

National archives of Australia. Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Implementation Guidelines: Exposure Draft.

20.

State Records Authority of NSW. NSW Recordkeeping Metadata Standard, NSW Recordkeeping Metadata Standard– Technical Specification.

21.

State Records of South Australia. South Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Version 4.1.

22.

Queensland State Archives. Queensland Recordkeeping Metadata Standard and Guideline.

23.

Wallace, David A.. (2000). Archiving Metadata Forum: Report from the Recordkeeping Metadata Working Meeting, June 2000. Archival Science, 1, 255-256.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management