바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.13 No.2
Citation Share

The Comparison and Analysis of Interoperability between Archival Authority and Library Authority

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2013, v.13 no.2, pp.227-246
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.227

(2013). The Comparison and Analysis of Interoperability between Archival Authority and Library Authority. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 13(2), 227-246, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.227
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study suggested the interoperability of authority scheme between archives and libraries having an international authority schemes. First, this study examined the standard of archival authority ISAAR (CPF) and EAC-CPF and the library authority model FRAD, analyzed the similarities and differences between them. Finally, this study ascertained the interoperability between authority control schemes. In each area, Archives and libraries have announced the proposal to develop authority control, but the directions of two institutes was identical by and large. The direction of development of authority scheme included extending the relationship between entities, sharing the records at the international level, and actively conducting the exchange of information within other organizations.

keywords
기록물 전거, 도서관 전거, ISAAR(CPF), EAC-CPF, FRAD, archival authority, library authority, ISAAR(CPF), EAC-CPF, FRAD, archival authority, library authority, ISAAR(CPF), EAC-CPF, FRAD

Reference

1.

김성희. (2005). 기록물 생산자 전거제어를 통한 맥락정보의 구축 및 교환 - ISAAR(CPF) 2판과 EAC를 중심으로 -. 한국비블리아학회지, 16(2), 61-88.

2.

김태수. (2008). 목록의 이해:한국도서관협회.

3.

박진희. (2007). 국제표준 기록물 전거제어 기술규칙 초판과 개정판의 비교분석 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 38(1), 341-361.

4.

이현정. (2006). 수집형 기록관의 전거제어시스템 분석 - 민주화운동기념사업회 사료관리시스템의 사례를 중심으로-. 기록학연구, (13), 91-134.

5.

한국기록관리학회. (2010). 기록관리론 : 증거와 기억의 과학:아세아문화사.

6.

Bearman, David A.. (2000). The Power of the Principle of Provenance, In American archival studies: readings in theory and practice.

7.

EAC-CPF Homepage. http://eac.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/.

8.

FRAD Homepage. http://www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-authority-data.

9.

ICA. (2004). ISAAR(CPF); International Standard Archival Authority Record for Corporate Bodies, Persons and Families. http://http://www.ica.org/?lid=10203.

10.

IFLA. (2011). 전거레코드의 기능 요건 및 번호배정 실무진전거 데이터의 기능 요건 (FRAD) 개념 모형. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2011-ko.pdf.

11.

ISO 15489-1:2001. International and Documentation - Records Management - Part 1: General.

12.

Jimerson, Randall C.. (2000). American archival studies: readings in theory and practice:Society of American Archivists.

13.

Pitti, Daniel V.. (2004). Creator Description: Encoded Archival Context. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(3/4), 201-226.

14.

SAA. (2010). Encoded Archival Context - Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families (EAC-CPF) Tag Library. Version 2010 (initial release). http://www3.iath.virginia.edu/eac/cpf/tagLibrary/cpfTagLibrary.html.

15.

Sibille, Claire. (2012). Implementation of EAC-CPF(Encoded Archival Context - Corporate bodies, Persons, Families) in France: towards the development of national authority files (-). 17th International Congress on Archives.

16.

VIAF Homepage. http://viaf.org.

17.

Vitali, Stefano. (2004). Authority Control of Creators and the Second Edition of ISAAR(CPF), International Standard Archival Authority Record for Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 8(3/4), 185-199.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management

e-Submission OA Policy