바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1598-1487
  • E-ISSN2671-7247

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.16 No.4

Citation Share

Business Records and Information Management as Preparation for e - Discovery Risks

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2016, v.16 no.4, pp.7-30
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.007


& (2016). Business Records and Information Management as Preparation for e - Discovery Risks. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(4), 7-30, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.007

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest the directions for record and information management (RIM) strategies for Korean companies as preparation for e-Discovery risks. It begins with the articulation key concepts and some RIM issues of e-Discovery, which is governed by the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedures. It analyzes three lawsuit cases for which Korean companies were sued by North American companies in order to determine the main reasons behind the defensible disposition failures. Based on the analyses, it suggests the RIM strategic policies for preparing the e-Discovery, including the development of inventories for documents and ESI in their possession, custody, or control; ensuring legal hold programs in good faith; and making defensible retention policies.

keywords
business records management, e-Discovery, Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, spoliation of evidence, litigation hold, legal hold, defensible disposition, record retention policies, inventories, retention schedules, Samsung Electronics, Kolon, 기업기록관리, 전자증거개시, 연방민사소송규칙, 증거인멸, 기록정보관리, 처분중지 통지, 방어가능한 처분, 기록보유정책, 인벤토리, 보유일정표, 삼성전자, 코오롱

Reference

1.

가산종합법률사무소. 한국 기업이 미국 소송의 당사자가 된 경우 유의해야 할 점 -Litigation Hold. http://kasaninsight.tistory.com/98.

2.

권혁심. (2014). 이메일증거의 인멸과 제재. 민사소송, 18(1), 181-213.

3.

김도훈. (2007). 電子證據開示에 관한 美聯邦法院判決의 檢討 -ZUBULAKE v. UBS WARBURG LLC 사안을 중심으로-. 법학연구, 17(3), 151-180.

4.

김도훈. (2009). 美國 證據開示節次上 電子證據의 湮滅에 관한 硏究. 중앙법학, 11(1), 117-142.

5.

김정환. (2015). 효율적인 증거개시․수집을 위한 제도 개선 방안:대법원 사법정책연구원.

6.

설문원. (2015). 기업 소송에 대비한 정보거버넌스의 구축 방안 - 세도나 정보거버넌스 원칙을 중심으로 -. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 46(4), 325-354.

7.

손경호. (2012). 특허소송 핵심 , ‘ 이디스커버리 ' 주목해야. http://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/news_view.asp?artice_id=20120927085552&type=det.

8.

유정호. (2013). e-Discovery 이해와 위기관리 전략:인포더박스.

9.

Business judgment rule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_judgment_rule.

10.

Kahn, Randy.. (2013). Chucking daises : Ten rules for taking control of your organization's digital debris:ARMA International.

11.

Legal hold law & legal definition. http://definitions.uslegal.com/l/litigation-hold/.

12.

Smallwood, Robert F.. (2014). Information governance : Concepts, strategies and best practices:John Wiley & Sons.

13.

The Sedona Conference. (2016). The Sedona Conference commentary on rule 34 and rule 45"possession, custody, or control". The Sedona Conference Journal, 17(2), 467-575.

14.

The Sedona Conference. (2014). The Sedona Conference commentary on information governance (125-170). The Sedona Conference Journal.

15.

The Sedona Conference. (2010). The Sedona Conference commentary on legal hold: The trigger & the process. The Sedona Conference Journal, 11(Fall), 265-287.

16.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company, Plaintiff, v. Kolon Industries, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:09cv58. Aug. 30, 2012 (894 F.Supp.2d 691).

17.

United States District Court. D. New Jersey. Mosaid Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.P., Defendants. No. 01-CV-4340 (WJM). Dec. 7, 2004 (348 F.Supp.2d 332).

18.

United States District Court. Northern District of California. San Jose Division. Order granting-in-part Apple’s motion for an adverse inference jury instruction (Re: Docket No. 895). July 24, 2012, Paul S. Grewal, United States Magistrate Judge (Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK).

19.

United States District Court. Northern District of California. San Jose Division. Samsung’s notice of motion and motion for spoliation adverse inference instruction against Apple; Declaration of Alex Binder; Proposed order. July 26, 2012 (Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK).

20.

United States District Court. Northern District of California. San Jose Division. Order Re:Samsung’s motions for de novo determination of dispositive matter referred to Magistrate Judge, or, in the alternative, motion for relief from nondispositive pre-trial order of Magistrate Judge. 2012. 8. 21. Jucy. H. Koh, District Judge (Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK).

21.

Volonino, Linda. (2009). E-Discovery for dummies:John Wiley & Sons.

22.

(2012). What does the Apple-Samsung discovery/spoliation fight portend for the rest of us?. http://www.redgravellp.com/sites/default/files/2012%2009%2018%20Apple%20Samsung%20Discovery%20Buzz.pdf.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management

e-Submission OA Policy