바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.17 No.1
Citation Share

The Challenge of Personal Information Act for Oral History Project

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2017, v.17 no.1, pp.193-216
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.193

(2017). The Challenge of Personal Information Act for Oral History Project. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 193-216, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.193
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand issues related to the Personal Information Act recently emerging in the field of oral history, and to prepare countermeasures for oral history academics and archives. The Personal Information Act is intended to protect the confidentiality and freedom of the constitutional privacy, and to assure the right to self-determination of information, thereby realizing the dignity and value of the individual. Oral history is intended for living persons; therefore, strict ethical standards are needed to protect the morality of the person behind the sound recordings and appears as the subject of oral history. However, if the uniform application of the Personal Information Act is made, it is a requirement to make the process of consenting and notifying excessively complex and almost impossible to realize, making collection and service of oral history resource improbable. The mechanical and strict application of the Personal Information Act does not come into being because it has the aspect of undermining the inherent intrinsic value of oral history resources and making it difficult to maintain the authenticity of the records. To solve these problems, it is necessary to revise Article 58 (4) of the Personal Information Act of Korea. In addition, it is necessary to establish a guideline for the establishment of independent ethical standards of oral history itself, especially for the protection of the moral rights of third parties.

keywords
구술사, 구술자료, 개인정보, 개인정보 보호, 개인정보보호법, oral history, oral history resource, personal information, protection of personal information, Personal Information Act

Reference

1.

권건보. (2014). 개인정보 보호의 법과 정책:박영사.

2.

김일환. (2014). 개인정보보호법 적용대상의 합리화 방안― 법 제58조의 입법론을 중심으로 ―. 공법연구, 43(1), 31-54.

3.

박준석. (2013). 지적재산권법에서 바라본 개인정보 보호. 정보법학, 17(3), 2-39.

4.

오유석. (2010). 구술사 연구 윤리의 정립과 주요 쟁점 (28-38). 한국구술사학회, 한양대동시아문화네트워크연구단, 2010년 동계 구술사 워크숍: 구술사 연구기관 네트워크와 연구윤리.

5.

이양호. (2010). 구술채록 윤리강령을 위한 비완결적 제언 (39-43). 2010년 동계 구술사 워크숍: 구술사 연구기관 네트워크와 연구윤리.

6.

이창범. (2012). 개인정보 보호법:법문사.

7.

이필재. (2014). 개인정보보호법과 관련 법률의 체계문제. Crisisonomy, 10(1), 81-104.

8.

이호신. (2010). 구술자료의 저작권 문제에 관한 연구. 구술사연구, 1(1), 49-75.

9.

이호신. (2012). 구술자료의 인격적인 권리에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 47-69.

10.

이희영. (2010). 구술사 연구 윤리에 대한 제언: 과학 연구와 삶의 긴장 (44-45). 2010년 동계 구술사 워크숍:구술사 연구기관 네트워크와 연구윤리.

11.

행정안전부. 개인정보 보호법령 및 지침․고시 해설.

12.

박준규. (2016). IRB와 구술사 연구윤리 : 한민족다문화 협력적 구술생애사 연구 사례를 중심으로. 구술사연구, 7(2), 133-161.

13.

Neuenschwander, John A.. (2009). A Guide to Oral History and Law:Oxford Press.

14.

Shopes, Linda. (2007). Negotiating Institutional Review Board. https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/march-2007/institutional-review-boards.

15.

Ward, Alan. Is your oral history legal and ethical?. http://concernedhistorians.org.

16.

개인정보 보호법(법률 제14107호).

17.

개인정보 보호법 시행령(대통령령 제26776호).

18.

개인정보 보호법 시행규칙(행정자치부령 제1호).

19.

표준 개인정보보호 지침(행정자치부 고시 제2016-21호).

20.

헌재 2005.5.26. 선고. 99헌마513 결정.

21.

헌재 2005.5.26. 선고. 2004헌마190 결정.

22.

국가법령정보센터. http://www.law.go.kr.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management

e-Submission OA Policy