바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on Social Impacts of Archives through Outcome-based Evaluation

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2017, v.17 no.1, pp.73-92
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.073

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Archives identify and preserve records created by society. By making them available to people, archives can be a means of support to the community. The purpose of this study is to develop a model to measure the social impact of archives. Reviewing findings from previous research on the social impact of archives, this study’s model is based on the logic model, an outcome-based evaluation model, given that impact is not only followed by outcomes but can be the outcome itself. The scope of social impact is limited to community empowerment in terms of the applicability of the suggested model. The model, which includes short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes, could be used to measure changes in the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of archive users, and the social engagement of the people who experienced those changes in the community. The proposed model could include final outcomes that indicate the increase of community empowerment according to the civil society engagement. It is expected that the model is validated through applying quantitative and qualitative methodologies to measure the social impact of archives.

keywords
사회적 영향, 기록관, 기록정보서비스, 성과평가, 영향연구, 논리모형, social impact, archives, reference service, outcome evaluation, impact research, logic model

Reference

1.

국가기록원. (2011). 기록학 개론:국가기록원.

2.

국가기록원. (2014). ’14년 국가기록원 기록물 열람서비스 고객만족도 조사 결과보고. http://www.archives.go.kr/next/common/downloadFile.do?up_filepath=2F757046696c652F6265666f7265496e666f2F313433343333353732383731372e706466.

3.

김두리. (2014). 대학기록관 이용자의 기록정보서비스 인식에 관한 연구: J교육대학교를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 31(4), 29-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.029.

4.

김지현. (2012). 국가기록원 기록정보서비스에 대한 이용자 인식에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(1), 167-187.

5.

김현지. (2009). 웹을 통한 기록정보서비스 평가모형 개발과 서비스 평가 : 대학기록관을 중심으로.

6.

김현지. (2009). 웹 기록정보서비스 평가모형 개발과 서비스 평가 - 대학기록관을 중심으로 -. 한국기록관리학회지, 9(2), 59-78.

7.

박성재. (2015). 논리모델을 이용한 도서관 성과측정에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 26(2), 269-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.2.269.

8.

유사라. (2001). 정보서비스 평가 연구 : 국내 행정부처 Web 정보사례. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(3), 93-115.

9.

이명희. (2004). 중앙 행정부처 웹사이트의 정보서비스 평가: 정보공개와 이용자 참여를 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지, 15(2), 195-218.

10.

이윤주. (2007). 기록관의 온라인 서비스 향상을 위한 웹사이트 평가기준설계에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, (16), 143-201.

11.

이해영. (2012). 기록관의 정보서비스 현황 조사 및 서비스 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 177-201.

12.

이해영. (2007). 기록정보서비스의 평가 및 개선 방향. 한국기록관리학회지, 7(2), 25-42.

13.

장희정. (2012). 국가기록관 웹사이트의 평가에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(2), 51-70.

14.

정우철. (2016). 대학기록관 이용자의 기록정보서비스 평가. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 195-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195.

15.

한수연. (2012). 기록물관리기관 서비스 품질 척도 개발에 관한 연구 - 공공기관을 중심으로 -. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(1), 59-78.

16.

AEA Consulting. (2005). Tyne & Wear Museums Bristol’s museums, galleries & archives: Social impact programme assessment:AEA Consulting.

17.

Associaltion of College and Research Libraries. (2012). 2012 Top ten trends in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 73(6), 311-320.

18.

Brophy, P.. (2005). The development of a model for assessing the level of impact of information and library services. Library and Information Research, 29(3), 43-49.

19.

Burns Owen Partnership. (2006). New directions in social policy: Developing the evidence base for museums, libraries and archives in England. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111013135435/research.mla.gov.uk/evidence/documents/ndsp_developing_evidence_doc_6649.pdf.

20.

Calvert, Philip J.. (1997). Surveying Service Quality within University Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23(5), 408-415.

21.

Conway, P.. (1986). Facts and frameworks : An approach to studying the user of archives. American Archivists, 49, 393-407.

22.

Conway, P.. (1994). Partners in research : Improving access to the nation’s archive:Archives and Museum Informatics.

23.

Duff, W. M.. (2008). Archivists’ views of user-based evaluation : Benefits, barriers and requirements. American Archivist, 71(1), 144-166.

24.

Duff, W. M.. (2013). Social justice impact of archives : A preliminary investigation. Archival Science, 13(4), 317-348.

25.

Duff, W.. (2010). The development, testing, and evaluation of the Archival Metrics Toolkits. American Archivist, 73(2), 569-599.

26.

Durrance, J.. (2005). How libraries and librarians help : A guide to identifying user-centered outcomes:ALA.

27.

Horton, S. J.. (2006). Scoping the economic and social impact of archives. http://www.socialvalueuk.org/app/uploads/2016/07/scoping_the_economic_and_social_impact_of_archives___report_9739.pdf.

28.

The National Archives. A guide to developing an outcomes framework for archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/22.01.16_Measuring_outcomes_for_archives.pdf.

30.

PSQG. (2017). Survey of visitors to U.K. archives 2011. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/national-report-2011.pdf.

31.

Pugh, Mary J.. (2005). Providing reference services for archives and manuscripts:Society of American Archivists.

32.

University of Wisconsin Extension. Welcome to Enhancing Program Performance with Logic Models. https://fyi.uwex.edu/programdevelopment/files/2016/03/lmcourseall.pdf.

33.

Wavell, C.. (2002). Impact evaluation of Museums, Archives and Libraries: Available Evidence Project:The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries.

34.

W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). W. K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. https://www.wkkf.org/~/media/pdfs/logicmodel.pdf.

35.

Yakel, E.. (2010). Standardized survey tools for assessment in archives and special collections. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 211-222.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management