바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.17 No.1

Citation Share

Transition of Archival Description from ISAD(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2017, v.17 no.1, pp.93-115
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093

(2017). Transition of Archival Description from ISAD(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 93-115, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093

Abstract

In this study, the RiC-CM (Records in Context-Conceptual Model) draft of the International Council on Archives Expert Group on Archival Description (ICA EGAD) was analyzed, mapped with the descriptive elements of ISAD(G), and the archival description of the record group based on RiC-CM was piloted. This was done to identify trends in the archival descriptive standards and to derive considerations in relation to improving existing descriptive standards. The mapping types of RiC-CM and ISAD(G) include inter-attribute mapping, attribute-entity mapping, and attribute-relation mapping. In addition to the mapping between descriptive elements, a frame for the archival information that can construct a record through the objects, attributes, and relationships of RiC-CM is constructed using the protege, and the example data is inputted for trial. As a result, it was possible to express most of the existing descriptive information of ISAD(G) through RiC-CM. In addition, in RiC-CM, the recording descriptive information is classified in detail, and the characteristic of browsing the relation between individual objects is enhanced.

keywords
기록물 기술, 기록 레코드, 기록 온톨로지, Records in Context, RiC-CM, archival description, archival rerecords, archival ontology, Record in Context, RiC-CM

Reference

1.

국가기록원. 영구기록물 기술지침.

2.

박지영. (2016). 차세대 기록물 기술표준에 관한 연구 - ICA EGAD의 Record In Context를 중심으로 -. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 223-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223.

3.

Bekiari, Chryssoula. (2015). FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD(version 2. 3):International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation.

4.

Clavaud, Florence. (2016). Records in Contexts-Ontology(RiC-O). (-). ICA Congress.

5.

Clavaud, Florence. (2015). ICA Expert Group on Archival Description: Interim Report on the Development of a Conceptual Model (-). SAA Annual Meeting.

6.

Duranti, Luciana. (2016). Comments on “Records in Context.”:InterPARES Trust.

7.

Gueguen, Gretchen. (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description:A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives’ Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.

8.

Hooland, Seth van. (2014). Linked Data for Libraries, Archives, and Museums:ALA.

9.

ICA. General International Standard Archival Description.

10.

ICA. (2004). International Standard Archival Authority Records—Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families.

11.

ICA. International Standard Description of Functions.

12.

ICA. International Standard Description of Institutions with Archival Holdings.

13.

ICA. (2015). The Expert Group on Archival Description Web sites. http://www.ica.org/13851/egad-resources/egad-resources.html.

14.

ICA EGAD. Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description.

15.

IFLA Study Group on the FRBR. (2008). Functional Requirements For Bibliographic Records. Final Report. (amended and corrected through February 2009). IFLA.

16.

ISO. ISO 23081-1:2006 Information and documentation - Records management processes - Metadata for records - Part 1: Principles.

17.

McCarthy, Gavan. (2014). Expert Group on Archival Description (EGAD) (Presentation in DCMI Pre-Conference Special Session). http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/index/pages/view/2014-archives.

18.

McCarthy, Gavan. (2016). Conceptual Models as Informatic Models: Records in Contexts as a Network (Developing Standards for Managing Records over Time, ISO TC46/SC11 and ICA Experts Group on Archival Description) (-). ICA Congress.

19.

Pitti, Daniel. (2016). Introduction: Background, Context, Pivotal Changes (-). ICA Congress.

20.

Popovici, Bogdan-Florin. (2016). A Broader Perspective Over Records As Seen By ‘Ric’ (-). ICA Congress.

21.

Stockting, Bill. (2016). Records in Contexts-Conceptual Model(RiC-CM) (-). ICA Congress.

Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management

e-Submission OA Policy