바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Validation Study of Two Factor Model for Personality Assessment Inventory: Focused on Korean Adult Prisoners

Abstract

This study was conducted to validate whether a two-factor model which consist of the internalized and externalized measures of PAI represents similar model fitness in a study of Korean adult prisoners. Based on previous studies by Ruiz and others (2008), we explored the internal structure of PAI scales conducted on prisoners(N=788) in korean prisons, and found that there were 11 clinical scales, and 13 scales of suicide concepts (SUI) and aggressiveness (AGG) scales, which are important signs of internalizing and externalizing. PAI was conducted on the prisoners from individual prisons in five regions of Korea. As a result, the Cronbach's Alphas of the PAI full scale and subscale were generally superior. The correlations of the thirteen scales showed a high correlation between the subscales belonging to the internalizing factor and the subscales belonging to the externalizing factor. In the exploratory factor analysis, the distinction between the internalizing and externalizing factors of Korean adult prison prisoners was slightly different from the sub-constitutional scale of the PAI two-factor model of Ruiz and others (2008). Two notable features are the delusions (PAR) scale and the drug problem (DRG) scale, which were classified as externalizing scales in previous studies, classified as the internalizing scales in this study. In the results of the confirmation factor analysis, the conformity of the two factor model appears to be acceptable, and it appears to be the model that can be used in the domestic correction setting. Therefore, this study has explored the PAI internalizing and externalizing scales of adult prison prisoners who reflect the cultural characteristics of Korea, which differ from those of the West, and discussed effective interventions based on these two-factor model in the management and treatment of prisoners.

keywords
성격평가질문지(PAI), 내현화, 외현화, 2요인 모형, Personality Assessment Inventory, Internalization, Externalization, Two-dimensional model

Reference

1.

고제원, 이규호, 이민희 (2010). 비행청소년의 범죄유형별 PAI 프로파일. 한국법학회, 법학연구 39, 157-176.

2.

고윤화, 오상우 (2008). 소년범과 정상 청소년감별을 위한 PAI-A 프로파일의 유용성. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표 논문집, 1, 580-581.

3.

곽선영 (2005). 비행청소년의 재범 위험성차이에 관한 연구, 비행촉발요인조사와 PAI검사결과를 중심으로. 경기대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

김광수 (1990). 소외와 문제행동의 관계분석. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

김대진, 박민철, 이귀행, 이상열, 오상우 (2015). 청소년 성격평가질문지 요인분석. 소아청소년정신의학, 26(3), 226-235.

6.

김세일, 이영순 (2008). 교도소 수형자와 일반인 간의 성격특성분석-PAI를 중심으로. 한국교육실천연구학회, 교육실천연구 7(1), 21-37.

7.

김시업, 이혜선, 손지선, 전우병 (2004). 여성살인범의 범행관련 특징과 PAI에 나타난 성격 특성. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 9(3), 111-129.

8.

김영환, 권해수, 김지혜, 박은영, 박중규, 오상우, 이수정, 이은호, 조은경, 황순택, 홍상황 (2018). PAI 증보판 전문가 지침서. 서울: 학지사.

9.

김영환, 박은영, 홍상황, 이전아 (2001). 물질남용집단의 PAI 프로파일 유형과 물질사용척도의 진단기능. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20(4), 711-730.

10.

김영환, 오상우, 홍상황, 박은영 (2002). PAI의 임상적 해석. 서울: 인싸이트.

11.

김은미 (2014). 재비행 위험성의 정도에 따른 비행촉발과 PAI의 영향요인. 한국디지털정책학회, 디지털융복합연구, 12(2), 119-128.

12.

두정훈, 오자영, 이숙희, 오상우 (2005). PAI 우울척도(DEP)의 요인구조 - 정상인을 대상으로. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표 논문집. 370-371.

13.

박성수, 김미선 (2008). 경찰단계에서의 소년범위험성 평가에 의한 재범예측연구. 한국치안행정논집, 9(1), 27-47.

14.

박은영, 홍상황, 강덕규, 김영환 (2001). PAI의요인구조. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20(3), 583-594.

15.

박은영, 홍상황, 정상문, 김영환 (2002). 수형자의 PAI 프로파일과 범법행위 예언지표. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(4), 941-954.

16.

서종한, 김경일 (2011). 성범죄자 군집유형분석과 프로파일링 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(1), 155-172.

17.

오상우, 소현영, 임헤정, 박혜원, 두정훈 (2005). PAI 반사회적 특징척도(ANT)의 요인구조. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표 논문집. 372-373.

18.

이수정, 조은경, 양애란, 이수경, 황인숙, 백승경, 장미정, 이미선 (2004). 소년범선별기소를 위함 위험성 평가절차 개발. 사회 및 성격심리학회 춘계학술대회 논문집 및 심포지움 자료집. 29-52.

19.

임소희 (2018). PAI_A의 재표준화: 신뢰도와 타당도를 중심으로. 충북대학교 석사학위논문.

20.

유성희, 이수정 (2018). PAI-A 내현화와 외현화2요인 모형 검증 연구. 한국심리학회지:법, 9(3), 163-184.

21.

차재호 (1980). 한국인의 성격과 의식, 문화의연속과 변화에 대한 연구. 서울: 한국사회과학 연구협의회.

22.

차재호 (1994). 문화설계의 심리학. 서울: 서울대학교 출판부

23.

최상진, 김기범 (1999). 한국인의 심정심리: 심정의 성격, 발생과정, 교류양식 및 형태. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 18(1), 1-16

24.

홍상황, 박은영, 김영환 (2001). PAI 무선반응과 인상관리의 탐지: 타당성척도의 분할점수를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 20(1), 165-177.

25.

홍상황, 한태희 (2010). 한국판 성격평가질문지(PAI) 하위척도의 요인구조. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(3), 895-904.

26.

Bohman, M., Cloninger, C. R., von Knorring, A. L., & Sigvarasson, S. (1984). An adoption study of somatoform disorders: Ⅲ. Crossfostering analysis and genetic relationship to alcoholism and criminality. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 827-878.

27.

Bruner., J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Calabrese, R. L. (1987). Adolescence: A Growth period conducive to alienation. Adolescence, 22(88), 928-938.

29.

Cicchetti, D., & Garmezy, N. (1993). Prospects and promises in the study of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 497-502.

30.

Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., & Kropp, P. R. (2001). Validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory for forensic assessments. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 183-197.

31.

Edens, J. F., & Ruiz, M. A. (2005). PAI Interpretive Report for Correctional Settings(PAI-CS)Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

32.

Edens, J. F., Cruise, K. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J. K. (2001). Forensic and correctional applications of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 519-543.

33.

Hammen, C. (1990). Generation of stress in the course of unipolar affective disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 1112-1117.

34.

Helmes, E. (1993). A modern instrument for evaluating psychopathology: The Personality Assessment Inventory Professional Manual. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 414-417.

35.

Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., Krueger, R. F., Schade, N., Markon, K. E., & Morey, L. C. (2013). DSM-5 Pathological Personality Traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 20(3), 269-285.

36.

Karlin, B. E., Creech, S. K., Grimes, J. S., Clark, T. S., Meagher, M. W., & Morey, L. C. (2005). The Personality Assessment Inventory with chronic painpatients: Psychometric properties and clinical utility. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1571-1585.

37.

Kendler, K. S., Prescott, C. A., Myers, J., & Neale, M. C. (2003). The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 929-937.

38.

Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 921-926.

39.

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.

40.

Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., Patrick, C. J., Carlson, S. R., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002). Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: Modeling the externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 411-424.

41.

Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006a). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111-133.

42.

Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006b). Understanding psychopathology: Melding behavior genetics, personality, and quantitative psychology to develop an empirically based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 113-117.

43.

Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: A dimensionalspectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 537-550.

44.

Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2001). The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: Internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1245-1259.

45.

Kurtz, J. E., & Blais, M. A. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 1-4.

46.

Lally, S. J. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology. Research and Practice, 34, 491-498.

47.

Lazarus, S. A., Southward, M. W., & Cheavens, J. S. (2016). Do borderline personality disorder features and rejection sensitivity predict social network outcomes over time? Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 62-67.

48.

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderlinve personality disorder. New York:Guildford Press.

49.

McCrady, M. S. (1993). Alcoholism. In D. H. Barlow(Ed.), Clinical handbook of psycholgoical disorder: A step-by-step treatment manual (2nd ed., pp. 362-395). New York: Guildford Press.

50.

Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

51.

Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretative guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.

52.

Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.

53.

Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2006). The Personality Assessment Inventory and the measurement of normal and abnormal personality constructs. In S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 451-471). New York: Springer.

54.

Morey, L. C., & Quigley, B. D. (2002). The use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI)in assessing offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 46, 333-349.

55.

Piotrowski, C. (2000). How popular the Personality Assessment Inventory in practice and training? Psychological Reports. 86,65-66.

56.

Piotrowski, C., & Belterm, R. W. (1999). Internship training in psychological assessment:Has managed car had an impact? Assessment, 6, 381-389.

57.

Reidy, T. J., Sorensen, J. R., & Davidson, M. (2016). Testing the Predictive Validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory(PAI) in Relation to Inmate Misconduct and Violence. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), 871-884.

58.

Robins, L. N. (1991). Conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 193-212.

59.

Ruiz, M. A., & Edens, J. F., (2008). Recovery and Replication of Internalizing and Externalizing Dimensions Within the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 585-592.

60.

Schinka, J. A. (1995). Personality Assessment Inventory scale characteristics and factor structure in the assessment of alcohol dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 101-111.

61.

Schlosser, B. (1992). Computer assisted practice. The Independent Practitioner, 12, 12-15.

62.

Sher, K. J., & Trull, T. J. (1994). Personality and disinhibitory psychopathology: Alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 92-102.

63.

Sutker, P. B., Bugg, F., & West, J. A. (1993). Antisocial personality disorder. In P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbok of psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 337-369). New York: Plenum Press.

64.

Tasca, G. A., Wood, J., Demidenko, N., & Bissada, H. (2002). Using the PAI with an eating disordered population: Scale characteristics, factor structure, and differences among diagnostic groups. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 337-356.

65.

Turner, R. M. (1989). Case study evaluations of a biocognitive-behavioral approach for the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Behavior Therapy, 20, 477-489.

66.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15-25.

67.

White, L. J. (1996). Review of the Personality Assessment Inventory(PAI): A new psychological test for clinical and forensic assessment. Australian Psychologist, 31, 38-39.

68.

Williamson, D. E., Dahl, R. E., Birmaher, B., & Goetz, R. R. (1995). Stressful life events and EEG sleep in depressed and normal control adolescents. Biological Psychiatry, 37, 859-865.

logo