바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Donggun Jang vs. Taehee Kim: Effects of category versus exemplar primes on consumer judgments

Abstract

The present study examines how category and exemplar primes affect consumer judgments. The results show that the effects of category and exemplar primes on judgments of a product depend on whether the sex of participants and primes is identical. In the same sex conditions, participants perceived the product as more positive when an attractive category (vs. an attractive exemplar) was primed. In the opposite sex conditions, however, participants perceived the product as more positive when an attractive exemplar (vs. an attractive category) was primed. The implications of this study for priming effects and the field of consumer psychology are discussed.

keywords
category, exemplar, priming, consumer judgments

Reference

1.

김미혜, 전중옥 (2009). 광고모델의 매력성에 대한 소비자의 부정적 감정에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 10, 183- 207.

2.

김재휘, 부수현, 강윤희 (2008). 광고모델의 설득 효과: 모델의 수와 인종에 관한 사회적 추론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 9, 333-354.

3.

송정미 (2008). 브랜드선호도에 따른 광고모델과 자기개념의 일치성: 아파트브랜드를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 9, 25-44.

4.

유승엽, 김재영 (2007). 광고모델의 인종과 메시지 강도 및 문화가치에 따른 광고효과. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 1, 103-125.

5.

최일호, 한성열 (1999). 고정관념 활성화에 따른 촉진, 억제 효과 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13, 235-254.

6.

Atkin, C., & Block, M. (1983). Effectiveness of celebrity endorser. Journal of Advertising Research, 23, 57-61.

7.

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.

8.

Bower, A. B., & Laundreth, S. (2001). Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30, 1-12.

9.

Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knipeenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865-877.

10.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

11.

Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.

12.

Johnston, L. (2002). Behavioral mimicry and stigmatization. Social Cognition, 20, 18-35.

13.

Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). Effects of social category priming on personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 14, 315-319.

14.

Macrae, C. N., & Johnston, L. (1998). Help, I need somebody: Automatic action and inaction. Social Cognition, 16, 400-417.

15.

Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choices: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 235-245.

16.

North, A.C., Hargreaves, D. J., & McKendrick, J. (1997). In-store music affects product choice. Nature, 390, 132.

17.

Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.

18.

Stapel, D., & Koomen, W. (2001). I, we, and the effects of others on me: How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 766-781.

19.

Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 556-568.

20.

Suls, J. M., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

logo