바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Influence of the forced Exposure of Internet Ads on Advertising Effectiveness: Focusing on Moderating Effect of Web-Contents type

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore the influence of the forced exposure of Internet Ads on memory and attitude. The forced exposure of Internet Advertisements is supposed to interrupt web-user to process an information on the web-pages. The interruption of processing information cause negative emotion to web-user and lead to negative attitude toward advertisement as a result. This study examine that web-contents can play a role as control variable in decreasing negative effect of forced exposure of internet Ads. The web-contents is divided by information and entertainment type. It is expected that entertaining web-site decrease the negative attitude toward the forced internet Ads. An experiment was carried out in 2×2 factorial design which contains two types of forced Ads and web-contents as independent variables to find out effect on recall and attitude toward ads. The result shows that the forced exposure of internet Ads increase advertising recall and recognition, but have an negative effect on the attitude toward advertisement. The forced Ads has different effect in the context of web-sites. It is found that the search of information at the entertaining web-site decrease the negative attitude toward Ads from forced exposure than the search of information at the informative web-site. This study give an implication that the forced exposure of advertisement is undesirable in forming positive attitude, but can counter balance the negative effect in the context of web-contents.

keywords
forced exposure, web-contents type, internet, advertising effect

Reference

1.

김재휘․김용환 (2003). 인터넷 광고의 침입성과 관여가 광고효과에 미치는 영향, 광고연구, 60, 7-35.

2.

김재휘, 홍재욱 (2000). 인터넷 이용자들의 동기와 사이트 이용행동, 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 1(2), 25-46.

3.

김지호․김재휘 (2003). 인터넷 광고의 효과과정에 관한 연구: 자극성과 회피성을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 14(3), 165-190.

4.

김형준 (2002). 배너 광고 노출에 따른 부정적 감정이 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 웹 이용 동기, 제품 관여도, 사이트 만족도의 조절 역할을 중심으로, 소비자학연구, 13(4), 53-75.

5.

안재현, 이주원, 변준영, 한상필 (2009). 인터넷 배너 광고의 시각적 자극 특성이 시각적 주의와 기억에 미치는 영향: 과제와 시각적 복잡성의 조절효과를 중심으로, 마케팅연구, 24(4), 67-86.

6.

유창조, 이상준 (2011). 암묵적 기억성과는 상표친숙도 수준의 측정지표가 될 수 있는가? 마케팅연구, 26(2), 67-92.

7.

임승희 (2008). 인터넷 광고의 강제 노출이 기억과 태도에 미치는 영향. 상품학연구, 26(2), 81-93.

8.

최은영, 도선재 (2011). 인터넷 광고의 회피에 영향을 미치는 요인으로서의 매체 이용 동기와 능력, 광고 지각 및 광고 태도, 한국광고홍보학보, 16(2), 171-197.

9.

한국 온라인 광고협회 (2011). 2011년 온라인광고 시장규모, 보고서 & 세미나 자료

10.

홍종필, 마영애 (2006). 광고 혼잡도와 웹 콘텐츠 관여도에 따른 인터넷 배너광고의 기억효과에 관한 연구, 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 7(3), 401-431.

11.

황장선, 김은혜, 조정식 (2006). 웹 사이트에 대한 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인으로서의 인지된 상호작용성, 인터넷 이용 동기 및 관여도, 한국광고홍보학보, 8-1, 159-186.

12.

Aaker, D. S. & Bruzzone, D. E. (1985). Cause of Irritation in Advertising, Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 47-57.

13.

Benway, J. P. (1998). Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 463- 467.

14.

Bezjian-Avery, A., Calder, B., & Iacobucci, D. (1998). New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 23-32.

15.

Bloch, P. H. Sherrell, D. L., & Ridgway, N. M. (1986). Consumer Search: An Extended Framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 119-126.

16.

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance, New York: Academic Press.

17.

Brehm, S. S. & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control, New York Academic Press.

18.

Chatterjee, P. (2008). Are unclicked Ads wasted? Enduring effects of banner and Pop-up AD exposures on brand memory and attitudes, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1), 51- 61.

19.

Cho, C. H. & Cheon H. J. (2004). Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 89-97.

20.

Clee, M., A. & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer Behavior and Psychological Reactance, Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389.

21.

Danaher, P. J. & Mullarkey, G. W. (2003). Factors affecting online advertising recall: A study of students, Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 252-267.

22.

Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising Value and Advertising on the Web, Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 21-35.

23.

Ferguson, A. & Perse, M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a Functional Alternative to Television, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 155-174.

24.

Ha, L. (1996). Advertising Clutter in Consumer Magazines: Dimensions and Effects, Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 76-83.

25.

Hoffman, D. & Novak, T. D. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer Mediated Environment: conceptual foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60, 50-68.

26.

Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating Conscious and Unconscious Influences of Memory: Measuring Recolleciton. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122(2), 139- 154.

27.

Kim, H. & Stout, P. (2010). The Effects of Interactivity on Information Processing and Attitude Change: Implications for Mental Health Stigma, Health Communication, 25(2), 142-154.

28.

Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46-70.

29.

Lee, Wei-Na & Katz, H, (1993). New Media, New Message: An Initial Inquiry Into Audience Reactions to Advertising on Video- Cassets, Journal of Advertising Research, 33(1), 74-85.

30.

Leung, L. & Lee, P. S. N. (2005). Multiple determinants of life quality: the roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support, and leisure activities, Telematics and Informatics, 22(3), 161-180.

31.

Li, Hairong, Edwards, S, M., Lee, J. H. (2001). Measuring the Intrusiveness of Advertisemensts: Scale Development and Validation, Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 37-47.

32.

MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An Empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48-65.

33.

Mittal, B. (1994). Public Assessment of TV Advertising: Faint Praise and Harsh Criticism, Journal of Advertising Research, 34(1), 35-53.

34.

Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes, Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 71-84.

35.

Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet Use, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.

36.

Pavlou, P. A., & Stewart, D. W. (2000). Measuring the effects and effectiveness of interactive advertising: A research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), 62-78.

37.

Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication & Persuasion. New York, Sringer.

38.

Rodgers, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (1999). The Web Motivation Inventory: A new way to characterize web users. Paper presented at the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Albuquerque, NM.

39.

Rossiter, J. & Larry, P. (1987). Advertising and Promotion Management. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

40.

Steven, M., Edwards, Hairong Li, & Lee, J. H. (2002). Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads, Jounrnal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95.

41.

Sun, Y., Lim, K. H., Peng, J. Z., Jiang, C., Chen, X. (2008). Why and When Will Banner Blindness Occur? An Analysis Based on the Dual Processing Theory, Proceeding of Americas Conference on Informat, 4, paper 259.

logo