.png){kind=logo}
ISSN : 1229-8778
The purpose of this study is to suggest theoretical frame for social network service. For the purpose, we categorized SNS’s network structure to symmetric network and asymmetric network, and verified it is playing for self-construal priming. As a result, symmetric SNS users(Facebook users) were primed interdependent self-construal, and asymmetric SNS users(Twitter users) were primed independent self-construal. From this theoretical background, trying to classify best fit between message oriented(I oriented/we oriented) effect and attributes of consumer' benefit(hedonic-benefit/utilitarian-benefit) on Cause Related Marketing strategy. According to this experimental study, I oriented message and hedonic benefit are more effective with independent self-construal priming SNS on the CRM. And the other hand, message orient(we oriented) and benefit(utilitarian-benefit) works separately for self-construal.
김재휘, 부수현, 김희연 (2012). 공공캠페인 효과 촉진을 위한 SNS 커뮤니케이션 전략해석수준이론의 사회적 거리와 규범적 영향을 통한 설득. 한국광고홍보학보 (구 한국광고학보), 14(3), 66-91.
김준홍, 윤영민 (2010). 부정적 행위단서로서커뮤니케이션 경험이 일반인의 약물사용태도에 미치는 영향. 한국언론학보, 54(5), 5-31.
박유식, 경종수 (2002). 광고유형과 오디언스특성이 공익광고의 효과에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 13(5), 177-200.
박혜진, 김진욱, 김진우 (2014). 소셜 큐레이션서비스 환경에서 정보에 대한 맥락 단서가 사용자의 자각과 자기표현에 미치는영향. 한국 HCI 학회 학술대회, 1175-1178.
최헌호, 전홍식 (2014). 제품의 혁신정도, 자기개념 점화유형 및 가격 프레임 방식이혁신제품의 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자, 광고, 15(1), 1-39.
조형오 (2000). 금연광고 메세지 유형의 효과분석: 메세지 프레이밍과 메세지 소구방향의 매개역할. 광고학연구, 11(1), 133-157.
조형오, 김병희 (2000). 비만예방 광고의 메시지 유형별 설득효과 차이분석. 광고학연구, 11(4), 165-185.
최현경, 이명천, 김정현 (2008). 메시지 프레이밍과 지향성이 공익광고 효과에 미치는영향: 교통안전 공익광고를 중심으로. 한국광고홍보학보 (구 한국광고학보), 10(2), 34-65.
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California management review, 38(3), 103.
Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(6), 1122.
Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1-10.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication research, 3(1), 3-21.
Barnett, M. A., Klassen, M., McMinimy, V., & Schwarz, L. (1987). The role of self-and other-oriented motivation in the organ donation decision. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1).
Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to “help-self”and “help-others” charity ad appeals: The mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 15-28.
Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of conflict resolution, 265-279.
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human communication research, 27(1), 153-181.
Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 63(2), 308.
Higgins, T., & Tykocinski, O. (1992). Seff-Discrepancies and Biographical Memory:Personality and Cognition at the Level of Psychological Situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 527-535.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 132-140.
Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of consumer research, 404-420.
Holt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: a typology of consumption practices. Journal of consumer research, 1-16.
Barwise, P. (1993). Brand equity: snark or boojum?. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 93-104.
Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(6), 1122.
Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: determinants and consequences. Advances in consumer research, 10(1), 532-539.
Madden, M., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). 65% of online adults use social networking sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 1-14.
McIntosh, W. D., & Schmeichel, B. (2004). Collectors and collecting: a social psychological perspective. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 85-97.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2003). The Role of Brand/ Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns. Advances in Consumer Research, 30(1).
Prentice, D. A. (1987). Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 993.
Schouten, J. W. (1991). Personal rites of passage and the reconstruction of self. Advances in consumer research, 18(2), 49-51.
Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 124-148.
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of consumer research, 287-300.
Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of marketing, 73(5), 90-102.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Wang, C. L., & Mowen, J. C. (1997). The separateness‐connectedness self‐schema: Scale development and application to message construction. Psychology & Marketing, 14(2), 185-207.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Wicklund, R. A. (1985). Self-symbolizing and the neglect of others'perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 702.