바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Art Infusion Effect in Product Design: The Roles of Art Popularity and Art Image

Abstract

There’s been a growing interest in art infusion phenomena among marketing scholars and practitioners. As part of a research examining the effectiveness of art infusion, this research investigates how art popularity and image influences evaluation of consumer product, moderated by product sociality and art familiarity in the following two studies. Study 1 demonstrated that consumer’s pattern of reactions on art popularity and image differs depending on degrees of art familiarity and product sociality. More specifically, consumers with high art familiarity displayed higher product preference and purchase intention to products with art that is highly popular. In contrast, consumers with low art familiarity displayed higher product preference and purchase intention to products with cheerful art image. Also, the results were significant when the product was easily noticed by others (public product), rather than when the product was used at home or in private (private product). Study 2 revealed the effects of art popularity and image on product preference to consumers with low art familiarity, given the information on the art’s popularity. As a result, unlike the results from study 1, consumers with low art familiarity showed higher product preference to products with art of high popularity, regardless of the art image. These studies not only elaborated art infusion effect by integrating the characteristics of art, product, and consumer, but also offered the psychological and social meaning of art infusion effect from the perspective of consumers.

keywords
art infusion effect, art popularity, art image, art familiarity, product sociality

Reference

1.

통계청. 2013년 한국의 사회지표.

2.

한국문화예술위원회. 2013년 문예예감.

3.

문화체육관광부. 2013 공연예술실태조사.

4.

공현정 (2003). 공간디자인에서의 역동적인 비정형 형태의 동기와 표현유형에 관한 연구. 건국대학교 디자인 대학원 석사학위 논문.

5.

곽준식 (2009). 명화를 이용한 광고와 명화를패러디한 광고의 효과 차이 분석. 한국소비자학회 2009 춘계 학술대회 발표 논문집, 275-382.

6.

김성재 (2010). 아트 인퓨전 광고효과에 관한 연구. 동아대학교 경영대학원 박사학위 논문.

7.

김정현 (2009). 아트 광고가 소비자 반응에 미치는 효과-이성적/감성적 소비 성향과 문화예술 접근성을 중심으로. 홍보학 연구, 13(1), 97-122.

8.

이지은, 한여훈 (2010). 제품의 아트 주입이 소비자 평가에 미치는 영향: 제품유형에 따른 차이를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자, 광고, 11(4), 797-821.

9.

이지은, 한여훈 (2011). 아트 주입 유무가 럭셔리 지각에 미치는 영향: 제품 유형과 브랜드 컨셉 유형을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 22(5), 69-97.

10.

이주원, 성영신, 조경진 (2010). 제품 디자인의심리사회적 의미 연구. 한국심리학회지:소비자, 광고, 11(1), 159-182.

11.

이명우 (2010). 제품 디자인의 미적 측면이 제품평가에 미치는 영향: 소비자 특성과 제품군에 따른 차이를 중심으로. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

12.

이명천, 문성연, 김정현 (2010). 아트광고 효과연구: 제품-작품 적합성, 작품 친숙성 및제품 유형을 중심으로. 광고연구, 87(단일호), 41-70.

13.

이윤경 (2010). 표현주의 미술의 색채심리와 심리치료적 요인에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 산업경영디자인 대학원 석사학위 논문.

14.

성영신, 정수정 (2003). 신 (新) 기술 제품 디자인에 대한 소비자 반응 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자, 광고, 4(1), 1-23.

15.

전인수, 엄지윤 (2014). 아트인퓨전이 패키지와제품에 대한 소비자 평가에 미치는 영향. 소비자학연구, 25(1), 87-113.

16.

주동미 (2008). 아트 마케팅을 활용한 광고가 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 신문방송대학원 석사학위 논문.

17.

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.

18.

Augustin, D., & Leder, H. (2006). Art expertise:A study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science, 48(2), 135.

19.

Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of consumer research, 183-194.

20.

Becker, H. S. (1984). Art worlds. Univ of California Press.

21.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

22.

Berger, J. (2008). Ways of seeing (Vol. 1). Penguin UK.

23.

Cupchik, G. C. (1992). From perception to production: A multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy, 61-81.

24.

DiMaggio, P., & Useem, M. (1978). Social class and arts consumption. Theory and Society, 5(2), 141-161.

25.

Fisher, R. J., & Price, L. L. (1992). An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 477-486.

26.

Gaver, W. W., & Mandler, G. (1987). Play it again, Sam: On liking music. Cognition and Emotion, 1(3), 259-282.

27.

Graeff, T. R. (1996). Image congruence effects on product evaluations: The role of selfmonitoring and public/private consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), 481-499.

28.

Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2008). Art infusion: The influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 379-389.

29.

Holbrook, M. B. (1980). Some preliminary notes on research in consumer esthetics. Advances in consumer research, 7(1).

30.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 132-140.

31.

Huettl, V., & Gierl, H. (2012). Visual art in advertising: The effects of utilitarian vs. hedonic product positioning and price information. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 893-904.

32.

Kelly, R. F. (1987). CULTURE AS COMMODITY: THE MARKETING OF CULTURAL OBJECTS AND CULTURAL EXPERIENCES. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1).

33.

Kelly, R. F. (1987). Museums as status symbols II:Attaining a state of having been. Advances in nonprofit marketing, 2, 1-38.

34.

Larsen, G., Lawson, R., & Todd, S. (2009). The consumption of music as self-representation in social interaction. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 17(1), 16-26.

35.

Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British journal of psychology, 95(4), 489-508.

36.

Locher, P. J. (2003). An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception. Acta Psychologica, 114(2), 147-164.

37.

Margolin, V. (1992). Product appeal and the aura of art. Objects and images: studies in design and advertising, 194-209.

38.

Martindale, C. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. Journal of Mind and Behavior.

39.

Martorella, R. (Ed.). (1996). Art and business:an international perspective on sponsorship. Greenwood Publishing Group.

40.

Parsons, M. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge University Press.

41.

Pedersen, P. E. (2005). Adoption of mobile Internet services: An exploratory study of mobile commerce early adopters. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 15(3), 203-222.

42.

Peel, E. A. (1945). On identifying aesthetic types. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 35(3), 61-69.

43.

Schmidt, J. A., McLaughlin, J. P., & Leighten, P. (1989). Novice strategies for understanding paintings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3(1), 65-72.

44.

Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: a symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer research, 319-329.

45.

Storey, J. (1999). Cultural consumption and everyday life. Oxford University Press.

46.

Tajfel, H. Turner, JC (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations, 7-24.

logo