- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Comparison of the Heavy Metal Analysis in Soil Samples by Bench-Top ED-XRF and Field-Portable XRF
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2009, v.22 no.4, pp.293-301
&
(2009). Comparison of the Heavy Metal Analysis in Soil Samples by Bench-Top ED-XRF and Field-Portable XRF. Analytical Science and Technology, 22(4), 293-301.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
As a basic research for development of the domestic field-portable XRF spectrometer, we discussed the analytical results of bench-top ED-XRF and field-portable XRF method for polluted heavy metals such as Cr, As, Se, Hg, Pb, Cd in soil samples. To obtain the best performance of the XRF spectrometer, the instrumental parameters of X-ray tube-voltage and measurement time were optimized for 6 heavy-metal elements in soil using certified reference material. The quantitative analysis of Cr, As, Se, Hg, Pb, Cd concentration in certified reference materials and soil samples were compared by empirical method and fundamental parameter method.
- keywords
- Bench-Top ED-XRF, Field-Portable XRF, Heavy Metal, Soil
Reference
1
1. T. Sferckeman, A. Gomezb and H. Ciesielski, Sci. Total Environ., 178, 63-69(1996).
2
2. D. Gupta, J. M. Chatterjee, R. Ghosh, A. K. Mitra, S. Roy and M. Sarkar, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 274, 389-395(2007).
3
3. M. O. Stallard, S. E. Apitz and C. A. Dooley, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 31, 297-305(1995).
4
4. F. L. Melquiades and C. R. Appoloni, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 262, 533-541(2004).
5
5. M. Bounakhla, K. Embarch, F. Zahry, E. Bilal and P. Kump, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 275, 467-478(2008).
6
6. C. Vanhoof, V. Corthouts and K. Tirez, J. Environ. Monit., 6, 344-350(2004).
7
7. S. J. Goldstein, A. K. Slemmons and H. E. Canavan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2318-2321(1996).
8
8. D. J. Kalnickya and R. Singhvi, J. Hazard. Mater., 83. 93-122(2001).
9
9. J. Enzweiler and M. A. Vendemiatto, Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 28, 103-112(2004).
10
10. V. Ya. Borkhodoev, X-ray Spectrom., 31, 209-218(2002).
11
11. EPA, “EPA Method 6200”, 2007
Other articles from this issue
- Effect of the far infrared irradiated water on the growth of the cotyledons, hypocotyls and roots of the spring radishes
- A Study on change in thermal properties and chemical structure of Zr-Ni delay system by aging
- Comparison of the Heavy Metal Analysis in Soil Samples by Bench-Top ED-XRF and Field-Portable XRF
- Determination of trace boron in steels by prompt gamma-ray activation analysis
- Determination of carbaryl in aqueous solution by fluorescence spectrometry
- Effect of acid or base additive in the mobile phase on enantiomer separation of amino alcohols using polysaccharide derived chiral columns
- Analysis of residual neomycin in honey by LC-MS/MS
- Simultaneous analysis of residual glucocorticoids in egg by LC/MS/MS
- Contents of mercury, lead, cadmium, and arsenic in dried marine products
- Elucidation of new anti-impotency analogue in food
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.