- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
A spectrofluorimetric methods has been developed for the determination of carbaryl in an aqueous solution. The effects of excitation wavelength, concentration of surfactant, concentration of ethanol as cosurfactant and emission wavelength on the fluorescence intensity were investigated to find the optimum experimental conditions to determine carbaryl. The emission intensity of the carbayl was increased with addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a surfactant. The emission intensity of the carbaryl was further increased with addition of ethanol as a co-surfactant. The optimum conditions were 281 ㎚ for excitation wavelength, 1.0×10<SUP>−2</SUP> ㏖/L SDS, 20% (v/v) ethanol and 349 ㎚ for emission wavelength. Under the optimum conditions, the emission intensity increased with the carbaryl concentration in the range of 5×10<SUP>−7</SUP> to 1.0×10<SUP>−4</SUP> ㏖/L with a detection limit (3σ) of 1.1×10<SUP>−8</SUP> ㏖/L. The resulting correlation coefficient of the working curve was 0.9996.
1. S. Y. Choi, Korean J. Environ. Agric., 3(1), 79(1984).
2. T. Sasaki, Food Sanitation Reseasrch, 34(11), 989(1984).
3. Y. Satio, Food Sanitation Reseasrch, 34(11), 1003(1984).
4. M. Takeda, Food Sanitation Reseasrch, 34(11), 1019 (1984).
5. K. Kojima, Food Sanitation Reseasrch, 34(11), 1129 (1984).
6. J. L. Brugess, J. L. Bernstein and K. Hurlbut, Arch. Intem. Med., 154, 221-224(1994).
7. P. H. Kurtz, Am. J. Emerg. Med, 8, 68-70(1990).
8. G. Blaicher, W. Pfanhauser and H. Woidich, Chromatographia, 13, 438(1980).
9. M. S. K. Sundaram and S. Y. Szeto, R. Hindle, J. of Chromatogr., 177, 29(1979).
10. A. Ambrus and H. P. Thier, Pure & Appl. Chem, 58, 1035 (1986).
11. J. F. Lawrence, J. of Chromatogr., 123, 286(1976).
12. L. Ogierman, J. of Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 65, 1452 (1982).
13. C. M. Sparacino and J. W. Hines, J. of Chromatogr. Sci., 14, 549(1976).
14. W. J. Mayer and M. S. Greengerg, J. of Chromatogr., 209, 295(1981).
15. R. T. Krause, J. of Chromatogr., 185, 615(1979).
16. G. L. Muth and F. Erro, Bull. Environm. Contam. Toxicol., 24, 759(1970).
17. A. A. Alwarthan and F. A. Aly, Talanta, 45, 1131(1998).
18. S. Ruggeri, L. T. Vahteristo, A. Aguzzi, P. Finglas and E. Carnovale, J. Chromatogr. A, 855, 237(1999).
19. F. Mattivi, A. Monetti, U. Vrhovsek, D. Tonon and C. Andrés-Lacueva, J. Chromatogr. A, 888, 121(2000).
20. M. Yang and S. A. Tomellini, J. Chromatogr. A, 939, 59(2001).
21. W. F. Nirode, T. D. Staller, R. O. Cole and M. J. Sepaniak, Anal. Chem., 70, 182(1998).
22. M. W. Lada and R. T. Kennedy, Anal. Chem., 68, 2790 (1996).
23. J. Yang and W. Zhao, Anal. Lett., 26, 2291(1993).
24. N. Jie, J. Yang and Z. Zhan, Anal. Lett., 26, 2283 (1993).
25. P. Damiani, G. Ibanez and A. Olivieri, Anal. Lett., 26, 247(1993).
26. F. A. Mohamed, Anal. Lett., 28, 2491(1995).
27. D. G. Konstantianos, P. C. Ioannou and C. E. Efstathiou, Analyst, 116, 373(1991).
28. D. G. Konstantianos and P. C. Ioannou, Analyst, 117, 877(1992).
29. J. Gorges and S. Ghazarian, Anal. Chim. Acta, 276, 401(1993).
30. R. Maties, J. J. Arias, F. Jimenez and M. Roman, Anal. Lett., 25, 851(1992).
31. B. L. Kepner and D. M. Hercules, Anal. Chem., 35, 1239(1963).
32. E. C. Stanley, B. I. Kinneberg and L. P. Varga, Anal. Chem., 38, 1363(1966).
33. D. Wang, G. Alfthan and A. Aro, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 383(1994).
34. T. L. Miller and S. I. Senkfor, Anal. Chem., 54, 2022 (1982)
35. Z. Zeng and C. Xu, Anal. Lett., 25, 1573(1992).