- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Evaluation of the consistency and homogeneity of artificial latent fingerprint printed with artificial sweat
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2015, v.28 no.1, pp.26-32
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.1.26
&
(2015). Evaluation of the consistency and homogeneity of artificial latent fingerprint printed with artificial sweat. Analytical Science and Technology, 28(1), 26-32, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.1.26
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
The consistency and homogeneity of repetitive printing of artificial fingerprint were evaluated usinga visual minutiae comparison method and an Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS). The standardlatent fingerprint pattern was prepared by the printing of a master digital fingerprint pattern with an inkjet printercartridge case filled with artificial sweat. The mdigital fingerprint pattern was prepared with a scanningof an inked fingerprint pattern of a living subject. The intensities of the master digital fingerprint pattern wereadjusted by changing the ‘output level’ values of the Adobe Photoshop CS 5 software. Number of standardlatent fingerprint patterns were printed and then developed with conventional latent fingerprint developingmethods; ninhydrin treatment method and 1,2-indandion(1,2-IND)/ZnCl2 treatment method. The ridge details ofthe latent fingerprint patterns developed with the reagents were visually compared with the inked fingerprintpattern and could confirm that the minutiae of both patterns are visually identical. The ridge detail of the inkedfingerprint and reagent developed standard latent fingerprint patterns were compared with an AFIS. The averagenumber of minutiae searched by the AFIS was 52.4±2.4 (range = 48~56) for 50 ninhydrin developed latentfingerprint patterns, and 50.2±1.9 (range = 47~53) for 50 1,2-IND/ZnCl2 developed latent fingerprint patterns. These low standard deviation values over 50 repetitive printing demonstrated that the 50 standard latent patternswere printed with consistent and homogeneous manner.
- keywords
- latent fingerprint, artificial sweat, AFIS, evaluation, minutiae
Reference
1
1. V. Sears, S. M. Bleay, H. L. Bandey and V. J. Bowman, Science and Justice, 52(3), 145-160 (2012).
2
2. C. Wallace-Kunkel, C. Lennard, M. Stoilovic and C. Roux, Forensic Science International, 168(1), 14-26 (2007).
3
3. C. Fairley, S. M. Bleay, V. G. Sears and N. NicDaeid, Forensic Sci. Int., 217(1), 5-18 (2012).
4
4. R. S. Croxton, M. G. Baron, D. Butler, T. Kent, and V. G. Sears, Forensic Sci. Int., 199(1), 93-102 (2010).
5
5. C. Marriott, R. Lee, Z. Wilkes, B. Comber, X. Spindler, C. Roux and C. Lennard, Forensic Sci. Int., 236, 30-37 (2014).
6
6. D. L. Exline, C. Wallace, C. Roux, C. Lennard, M. P. Nelson and P. J. Treado, J. Forensic Sci., 48(5), 1047-1053 (2003).
7
7. G. S. Sodhi and J. Kaur, Forensic Sci. Int., 123(3), 172-176 (2001).
8
8. O. P. Jasuja, M. A. Toofany, G. Singh and G. S. Sodhi, Science and Justice, 49(1), 8-11 (2009).
9
9. L. A. Lewis, J. Forensic Sciences, 46(2), 241-246 (2001).
10
10. J. W. Bond, J. Forensic Sci., 53(4), 812-822 (2008).
11
11. R. Jelly, S. W. Lewis, C. Lennard, K. F. Lim and J. Almog, Chem. Commun., 30, 3513-3515 (2008).
12
12. L. Schwarz, J. Forensic Sci., 54(6), 1323-1326 (2009).
13
13. A. A. Cantu, D. A. Leben, M. M. Joullie, R. J. Heffner and R. R. Hark, J. Forensic Identif., 43(1), 44-66 (1993).
14
14. M. Azoury, R. Gabbay, D. Cohen and J. Almog, J. Forensic Sci., 48(3), 564-570 (2003).
15
15. O. P. Jasuja and G. Singh, Forensic Sci. Int., 192(1), e11-e16 (2009).
16
16. M. Y. Choudhry and R. D. Whritenour, J. Forensic Sci., 35, 1373-1383 (1990).
17
17. C. Roux, N. Jones, C. Lennard and M. Stoilovic, J. Forensic Sci., 45(4), 761-769 (2000).
18
18. Y. P. Luo, Y.-B. Zhao and S. Liu, Forensic Sci. Int., 229(1), 75-79 (2013).
19
19. J. W. Bond, J. Forensic Sci., 59(2), 458-489 (2014).
20
20. A. Rawji and A. Beaudoin, J. Forensic Identif., 56(1), 33 (2006).
21
21. L. Schwarz and I. Klenke, J. Forensic Sci., 52(3), 649-655 (2007).
22
22. N. M. Egli, C. Champod, P. Margot, Forensic Sci. Int., 167(2-3), 189-195 (2007).
23
23. R. Ramotowski, ‘Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in Fingerprint Technology’, 3rd Ed. CRC Press, 2012.
Other articles from this issue
- Development of a method for the determination of 4-(methylnitrosamino)- 1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in dust using liquld chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
- Electrochemical gas sensor based on Pt-Ru-Mo/MWNT electrocatalysts and vinyl ionic liquids as electrolyte
- Development and validation of a selective and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for determination of misoprostol acid in human plasma: Application to bioequivalence study
- Evaluation of the consistency and homogeneity of artificial latent fingerprint printed with artificial sweat
- Characterization of CdS-quantum dot particles using sedimentation field-flow fractionation (SdFFF)
- Optimization of hydrochar generated from real food waste using titration methods
- Acidification and neutralization characteristics of size-fractionated atmospheric aerosols at Gosan site of Jeju Isalnd
- Concentration distributions and formation characteristics of trihalomethanes in drinking water supplies to rural communities
- Development of intracellular organelle markers using modified glycolipid-binding peptides in mammalian cells
- Effect of Angelica gigas extract powder on progress of osteoarthritis induced by monosodium iodoacetate in rats
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.