Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

    Concentration distributions and formation characteristics of trihalomethanes in drinking water supplies to rural communities

    Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
    2015, v.28 no.1, pp.58-64
    https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.1.58


    • Downloaded
    • Viewed

    Abstract

    This study aimed to investigate the concentration distributions and formation characteristics oftrihalomethanes (THMs) in drinking water supplies to rural communities. Water samples were collected twice from40 rural households located on the outskirts of Chuncheon city of Gangwon Province in the summers of 2010 and2011, and urban drinking water samples were collected from 20 faucets during the same period in 2011 for comparisonpurpose. Water temperature, pH, and residual chlorine (total and free) concentrations were measured in the field, andsamples were analyzed for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and THM concentrations in the laboratory. The averageDOC concentrations in rural water samples were not greatly different between groundwater (n = 20) and surface water(n = 20) which were used as sources for drinking water (1.81 vs. 1.91 mg/L). However, the average concentrationsof total THMs (TTHMs) in groundwater (9.77 μg/L) were much higher than those in surface water (2.85 μg/L) andsimilar to those in urban drinking water samples (10.8 μg/L). Unlike urban water supply, rural water (particularlygroundwater) contained more brominated THM species such as dibromochloromethane (DBCM), suggesting itsrelatively high content of bromide ion (Br-). This study showed that rural water supplies have different THM formationcharacteristics from urban water supplies, probably due to their differences in source water quality properties.

    keywords
    GC-MS, purge and trap, trihalomethanes, rural drinking water supply


    Reference

    1

    1. Ministry of Environment, ‘2012 Drinking Water Supply Statistics’, 2013.

    2

    2. K. A. Yun, M. H. Koo, G. H. Yi, H. S. Sin, J. Y. Jung, J. C. Shin, S. R. Kim and G. J. Choi, Rep. Inst. Health & Environ., 22, 89-98 (2011).

    3

    3. H. Kim, J. Song and B. Song, J. Environ. Toxicol., 24, 293-301 (2009).

    4

    4. EPA, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), http://www.epa.gov/iris.

    5

    5. H. Kim, M. Kim and J. Yoon, Kor. J. Environ. Toxicol., 17, 125-133 (2002).

    6

    6. G. Bae, Y. Baek, K. Ryu, S. Shin and C. Lee, J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng., 33, 893-899 (2011).

    7

    7. H. Shin and H. Kim, J. Kor. Soc. Water Qual., 20, 120-125 (2004).

    8

    8. H. Kim, Sci. Total Environ., 403, 59-67 (2008).

    9

    9. EPA, Method 524.3 - EPA Document # EPA 815-B- 09-009 (June 2009), USA.

    10

    10. E. E. Chang, Y. P. Lin and P. C. Chiang, Chemopsphere, 43, 1029-1034 (2001).

    11

    11. P. Westerhoff, P. Chao and H. Mash, Water Res., 38, 1502-1513 (2004).

    12

    12. V. Uyak and I. Toroz, J. Hazard. Mater., 149, 445-451 (2007).

    13

    13. R. Sadiq and M. J. Rodriguez, Sci. Total Environ., 321, 21-46 (2004).

    14

    14. S. Chowdhury, P. Champagne and P. J. McLellan, Sci. Total Environ., 407, 4189-4206 (2009).

    상단으로 이동

    Analytical Science and Technology