- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Comparison of strip analysis and HPLC analysis for the quantitative analysis of cyanobacterial toxin
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2015, v.28 no.3, pp.168-174
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.3.168
&
(2015). Comparison of strip analysis and HPLC analysis for the quantitative analysis of cyanobacterial toxin. Analytical Science and Technology, 28(3), 168-174, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.3.168
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Cyanobacterial toxins, such as microcystins, which exist in Korean lakes, are strongly toxic in fish, cattle, and humans. This study performs a quantitative analysis of cyanobacterial toxins in water by comparing the strip method and the HPLC method. Because the detection ranges of the strip method and the HPLC method are different, the water samples were diluted. The comparison of the strip method and the HPLC method was made using seven samples that contained different concentrations of microcystin. The quantitative results produced by the strip analysis were significantly aligned with the results of the HPLC analysis. The results of correlation analysis were r = 0.99998 and p = 0.00001.
- keywords
- cyanobacterial toxin, microcystin, strip, HPLC
Reference
1
1. G. Francis, Nature(London), 18, 11-12 (1878).
2
2. M. Schwimmer and D. Schwimmer, ‘Medical Aspects of Phycology’, p279, D. F. Jackson, Ed., Syracuse Univ., (1968).
3
3. W. W. Chrmichael and R. S. Saffermann, ‘A Status Report on Planktonic Cyanobacteria (Blue-Green Algae) and Their Toxins’, EPA/600/R92/079, 1992.
4
4. K. Berg, W. W. Carmichael, O. M.Skulberg, C. Benestad and B. Underdal, Hydrobiol., 144, 97-103 (1987).
5
5. K. I. Harada, K. Matsura, M. Suzake, H. Oka, M. F. Watanabe, S. Oishi, A. M. Dahlim, V. R. Beasley and W. W. Carmichael, J. Chromatogr., 448, 275-283 (1988).
6
6. L. A. Lawton, C. Edwards and G. A. Codd, Analyst, 119, 1525-1530 (1994).
7
7. J. Rapala, K. Erkomaa, J. Kukkonen, K. Sivonen and K. Lahti, Anal. Chim. Acta, 466(2), 213-231 (2002).
8
8. L. N. Sangolkar, S. S. Maske and T. Chakrabarti, Water Res., 40(19) 3485-3496 (2006).
9
9. P. P. Shen, Q. Shi, Z. C. Hua, F. X. Kong, Z. G. Wang, S. X. Zhuang and D. C. Chen, Environ. Int., 29(5) 641-647 (2003).
10
10. L. Spoof, K. Karlsson and J. Meriluoto, J. Chromatogr. A 909(2), 225-236 (2001).
11
11. K.-I. Harada, M. Suzuki, A. M. Dahlem, V. R. Beasley, W. W. Carmichael and K. L. Rinehart, Toxicon, 26 433-439 (1988).
12
12. M. Namikoshi, K. Sivonen, W. R. Evans, F. Sun, W. W. Carmichael and K. L. Rinehart, Toxicon, 30, 1473-1479 (1992).
13
13. J. Cremer, H. Meyer and K. Henning, J. Chromatogr., 558, 430-434 (1991).
14
14. J. Cremer and K. Henning, J. Chromatogr., 587, 71-80 (1991).
15
15. M. Craig, T. L. McCready, H. A. Luu, M. A. Smillie, P. Dubord and C. F. B. Holmes, Toxicon, 31, 1541-1549 (1993).
16
16. S. M. F. Azevedo, W. R. Evans, W. W. Carmichael and M. Namikoshi, J. Appl. Phycol., 6, 261-265 (1994).
17
17. R. Kfir, E. Johannsen and D. P. Botes, Toxicon, 6, 543-522 (1986).
18
18. F. S. Chu, X. Huang, R. D. Wei and W. W. Carmichael, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55, 1928-1933 (1989).
19
19. F. S. Chu, X. Huang and R. D. Wei, J. Assoc. Anal. Chem., 73, 451-456 (1990).
20
20. M. G. Weller, A. Zeck, A. Eikenberg, S. Nagata, Y. Ueno and R. Niessner, Anal. Sci., 17, 1445-1448 (2001).
21
21. A. Zeck, M. G. Weller, D. Bursill and R. Niessner, Analyst, 126, 2002-2007 (2001).
22
22. A. Zeck, M. G. Weller and R. Niessner, Anal. Chem., 73, 5509-5517 (2001).
23
23. P. Lindner, R. Molz, E. Yacoub-G-George, A. Durkop and H. Wolf, Anal. Chim. Acta, 521, 37-44 (2004).
24
24. C. T. Bishop, E. F. Anet and P. R. Gorham, Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 37, 453-471 (1959).
25
25. J. A. Meriluoto, A. Sandstrm, J. E. Remand, G. A. Craog and J. Chattopadhyaya, Toxicon, 27, 1021-1034 (1989).
26
26. D. Pyo, M. Yim and E. Kim, Anal. Sci. Technol., 25(6), 388-394 (2012).
Other articles from this issue
- Analytical methods for atmospheric particulate aerosols: Focused on the physical properties and chemical composition of metals and water soluble ionic compounds
- A study on the development of analytical method for zinc pyrithione in cosmetics
- Comparison of strip analysis and HPLC analysis for the quantitative analysis of cyanobacterial toxin
- Development of analytical method for cyantraniliprole residues in welsh onion (Allium species)
- Study on the production of porous CuO/MnO2 using the mix proportioning method and their properties
- QSPR analysis for predicting heat of sublimation of organic compounds
- Analysis of selenoaminoacids and selenoproteins in blood serum of sows fed by selenium fortified feed
- Photoluminescence analysis of Lewis base coordinate europium(III) β-diketonate complex
- The analysis of endocrine distruptors in commercial cosmetics
- Analysis of animal glue by pyrolysis/GC/MS
- Evaluation of 226Ra analysis methods using a gamma-ray spectrometer and a liquid scintillation counter
- Evaluation of the combustion chamber for burning candle and measuring the emission factor of its’ combustion products
- Distribution characteristics on volatile organic compounds at the forest of Mt. mudeung and downtown
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.