- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Establishment of analytical methods for HPHC list of mainstream cigarette smoke
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2015, v.28 no.6, pp.385-397
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.6.385
&
(2015). Establishment of analytical methods for HPHC list of mainstream cigarette smoke. Analytical Science and Technology, 28(6), 385-397, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2015.28.6.385
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) are chemical compounds in tobacco smoke that cause harm to smokers and non-smokers. This study established and validated methods for the analysis of HPHCs from mainstream cigarette smoke. The analyzed HPHCs were categorized into seven groups: aromatic amines, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals, tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), ammonia, and carbonyl compounds. The methods were validated by specificity, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), accuracy, precision, and recovery. These validated methods were then applied to the reference cigarettes (1R5F, 3R4F). The correlation coefficients (r2) for the calibration curves of the seven groups were over 0.995. The LODs showed values of 0.01-0.04 ng/cig cig for aromatic amines, 0.01-0.16 μg/cig for VOCs, 0.01-1.27 ng/cig for heavy metals, 0.06-0.28 ng/cig for TSNAs, 0.04 ng/cig for benzo[a]pyrene, 0.08 μg/cig for ammonia, and 0.78- 1.77 μg/cig for carbonyl compounds. The precisions obtained from the intra and inter-day batches were less than 15%. The accuracy and the recovery range were less than 15% and 79.2-117.5%, respectively. The proposed methods can therefore be applied for determining HPHCs in tobacco mainstream smoke.
- keywords
- 1R5F, 3R4F, cigarette, HPHCs
Reference
1
1. S.-J. Kim and S.-M. Kwon, The Korean Assoc. Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 18(4), 119-140 (2008).
2
2. C. R. Green and A. Rodgman, Recent Adv. tob. Sci, 22, 131-304 (1996).
3
3. S. S. Hecht, Environ. Mol. Mutagen, 39, 119-126 (2002).
4
4. WHO, In ‘WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic’, Mpower, (2002).
5
5. IARC, In ‘International agency for research on cancer’, 83 (2004).
6
6. E. L. Wynder and E. A. Graham, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 143, 329-336 (1950).
7
7. R. Doll and A. B. Hill, Br. Med. J., 2, 739-748 (1950).
8
8. H.-K. Kim, J.-T. Lee, I.-J. Kim and K.-J. Hwang, J. Kor. Soc. Tobacco., 9, 52-57 (2007).
9
9. ISO, 3308 : 2000(E) (2000).
10
10. Health Canada, T-202 (1999).
11
11. CORESTA, No.70 (2010).
12
12. Health Canada, T-109 (1999).
13
13. CORESTA, No.75 (2012).
14
14. British American Tobacco Group Research & Development Method, In ‘Determination of benzo[a]pyrene in mainstream smoke’, (2008).
15
15. Health Canada, T-101 (1999).
16
16. British American Tobacco Group Research & Development Method, In ‘Determination of carbonyls in mainstream cigarette smoke’, (2008).
17
17. M. Intorp and S. Purkis, Beitr Zur Tabakforsch., 24, 78-92 (2014).
18
18. C. Patriankos and D. Hoffmann, J. Anal. Toxicol, 3, 150-154 (1979).
19
19. M. Intorp, W. S. Purkis and W. Wagstaff, Beitr Zur Tabakforsch, 24(5), 243-251 (2014).
20
20. UK SMOKE CONSTITUENTS STUDY, In ‘Part 11: Determination of Metals Yields in Cigarette Smoke By ICP-MS & CVAAS’, (2003).
21
21. E. Roemer, H. Schramke, H. Weiler, A. Buetter, S. Kausche, S. Weber, A. Berges, M. Stueber, M. Muench, E. Trelles-Sticken, J. Pype, K. Kohlgrueber, H. Voelkel and S. Wittke, Beitr Zur Tabakforsch, 25(1), 316-335 (2014).
22
22. S. Purkis and M. Intorp, Beitr Zur Tabakforsch, 26(2), 57-73 (2014).
23
23. UK smoke constituents study. In ‘Part 4 method: determination of benzo[a]pyrene yields in mainstream cigarette smoke by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry’, (2003).
24
24. M. Intorp, S. Purkis, M. Whittaker and W. Wright, Beitr Zur Tabakforsch, 23(4), 161-202 (2014).
25
25. M. Intorp, S. Purkis and W. Wagstaff, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom, 25(2), 361-374 (2014).
Other articles from this issue
- Regulatory mechanism of Angelica Gigas extract powder on matrix metalloproteinases in vitro and in vivo model
- Determination of phenol using solid-phase extraction and HPLC/MSD/FLD in water
- Status of a national monitoring program for environmental radioactivity and investigation of artificial radionuclide concentrations (134Cs, 137Cs and 131I) in rivers and lakes
- Establishment of analytical methods for HPHC list of mainstream cigarette smoke
- A case study of verifying a suicide by carbon monoxide intoxication committed by burning an ignition charcoal briquette
- Improvement of analytical methods for arsenic in soil using ICP-AES
- A study of relationship between stomach cancer and selenoproteins in Korean human blood serum
- Development of a cholesterol biosensor modified with carbon nanotube
- Two dimensional analysis between the performance and the sensitivity of methylnitroimidazole derivatives
- Analysis of volatile compounds and metals in essential oil and solvent extracts of Amomi Fructus
- Evaluation of proficiency and improvement of accuracy on the analysis of brominated flame retardants (PBDEs) in ABS polymer
- Optimization of fractionation efficiency (FE) and throughput (TP) in a large scale splitter less full-feed depletion SPLITT fractionation (Large scale FFD-SF)
- Quantitative analysis of cholesterol in infant formula by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.