- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
논문 상세
Home > 논문 상세
Effect of particle size of TiO2 and octyl-methoxycinnamate (OMC) content on sun protection factor (SPF)
분석과학 / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2017, v.30 no.4, pp.159-166
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2017.30.4.159
(한남대학교)
(한남대학교)
(한남대학교)
(한남대학교)
(한국지질자원연구원)
(한남대학교)
(한남대학교)
(한남대학교)
(한국지질자원연구원)
최재영,
이승호,
김수연,
김운중,
&
엄철훈.
(2017). . 분석과학, 30(4), 159-166, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2017.30.4.159
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
Exposure to UV light, i.e., UV-A (320-400 nm) or UV-B (290-320 nm) radiation, can cause skin cancer. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) effectively disperses UV light. Therefore, it is used as a physical UV filter in many UV light blockers. Usually, the TiO2 content in commercialized UV blockers is 25 % at most. To block UV-B, a chemical UV blocker, octyl-methoxy cinnamate (OMC) is used. OMC is commonly used in combination with TiO2. In this study, TiO2 and OMC were mixed in different proportions to produce UV blockers with different compositions. Also the changes in the sun protection factor (SPF) based on the composition and TiO2 particle sizes were investigated. In order to analyze the TiO2 particle size, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AsFlFFF) were used. The results showed that the SPF was influenced by the proportion of TiO2 and OMC, where the proportion of TiO2 induced a more significant influence. In addition, changes in the TiO2 particle size based on the proportion of OMC were observed.
- keywords
- Titanium dioxide (<TEX>$TiO_2$</TEX>), Octyl-methoxy cinnamate (OMC), Sun protection factor (SPF), Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4), Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
참고문헌
1
1. D. R. Hayden, A. Imhof, and K. P. Velikov, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 8(48), 32655-32660 (2016).
2
2. G.-S. Sim, J.-H. Kim, Y. Na, D.-H. Lee, B.-C. Lee, Y.-H. Zhang, and H.-B. Pyo, J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. Korea, 31(4), 329-335 (2005).
3
3. B. A. Gilchrest, N. A. Soter, J. S. Stoff, and M. C. Mihm, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 5(4), 411-422 (1981).
4
4. F. M. Vilela, F. M. Oliveira, F. T. Vicentini, R. Casagrande, W. A. Verri, Jr., T. M. Cunha, and M. J. Fonseca, J. Photoch. Photobio. B, 163, 413-420 (2016).
5
5. Y. Yoon, S. Bae, S. An, Y. B. Choe, K. J. Ahn, and I. S. An, Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 11(3), 417-426 (2013).
6
6. D.-C. Shin, J.-T. Lee, Y. Chug, N.-K. Kang, and J.-Y. Yang, Environ. Health Toxicol., 11(1), 1-10 (1996).
7
7. S. Miksa, D. Lutz, C. Guy, and E. Delamour, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 38(6), 541-549 (2016).
8
8. J. P. Santos Caetano, A. P. Abarca, M. Guerato, L. Guerra, S. Schalka, D. C. Perez Simao, and R. Vila, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 38(6), 576-580 (2016).
9
9. S. K. Jeon, E. J. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater., 317, 312-318 (2016).
10
10. D. Park, H. M. Shahbaz, S. H. Kim, M. Lee, W. Lee, J. W. Oh, D. U. Lee, and J. Park, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 238, 256-264 (2016).
11
11. A. P. Popov, A. V. Priezzhev, J. Lademann, and R. Myllylä, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 38(15), 2564-2570(2005).
12
12. N. Serpone, D. Dondi, and A. Albini, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360(3), 794-802 (2007).
13
13. L. A. Baker, L. C. Grosvenor, M. N. R. Ashfold, and V. G. Stavros, Chem. Phys. Lett., 664, 39-43 (2016).
14
14. C.-K. Zhoh, H.-J. Kwon, and S.-R. Ahn, Asia J. Beauty Cosmetol., 9(2), 1-8 (2011).
15
15. A. Samontha, J. Shiowatana, and A. Siripinyanond, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 399(2), 973-978 (2011).
16
16. C. C. Lin and W. J. Lin, Food and Durg Analysis, 19, 1-8 (2011).
17
17. D. Nesseem, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 33(1), 70-79 (2011).
18
18. J. C. Giddings, F. J. F. Yang, and M. N. Myers, Science, 193(4259), 1244-1245 (1976).
19
19. J. C. Giddings, ‘Characterization of colloid-sized and larger particles by field-flow fractionation’, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 156-159 (1988).
20
20. J. C. Giddings, Science, 260(5113), 1456-1465 (1993).
21
21. Martin E. Schimpf, Karin Caldwell, and J. C. Giddings, In ‘Chapter 18. Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation’, pp 279-294, K. G. Wahlund, Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2000.
22
22. Martin E. Schimpf, Karin Caldwell, and J. C. Giddings, In ‘Chapter 2. Retention-Normal Mode’, pp 31-48, Mark R. Schure, Martin E. Schimpf, and P. D. Schettler, Eds., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2000.
23
23. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety No. 2012-88(2012.08. 24), Republic of Korea.
24
24. C. H. Eum, D. Y. Kang, and S. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Environ. Anal., 9(4), 243-249 (2006).
25
25. E. J. Kim, M. J. Kim, N. R. Im, and S. N. Park, J. Photoch. Photobio. B, 149, 196-203 (2015).
26
26. S. Schachermeyer, J. Ashby, M. Kwon, and W. Zhong, J. Chromatogr. A, 1264, 72-79 (2012).
27
27. A. Zattoni, D. C. Rambaldi, P. Reschiglian, M. Melucci, S. Krol, A. M. C. Garcia, A. Sanz-Medel, D. Roessner, and C. Johann, J. Chromatogr. A, 1216(52), 9106-9112(2009).
28
28. S. Lee, S. Prabhakara Rao, M. H. Moon, and J. Calvin Giddings, Anal. Chem., 68(9), 1545-1549 (1996).
29
29. J. Choi, H. D. Kwen, Y. S. Kim, S. H. Choi, and S. Lee, Microchem. J., 117, 34-39 (2014).
권호 내 다른 논문
- Effect of particle size of TiO2 and octyl-methoxycinnamate (OMC) content on sun protection factor (SPF)
- Do-It-Yourself (DIY) manufacture of a Nano-LC MALDI spotter robot using 3D printing technology
- Analysis of fatty acid methyl ester in bio-liquid by hollow fiber-liquid phase microextraction
- Variation in chemical composition of Asian dusts on Jeju Island related to their inflow pathways during 2010-2015
- Sensitive determination of pendimethalin and dinoseb in environmental water by ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
- Quantitative comparison of acidic polysaccharides in the endosperm of two major varieties of rice
- Temperature-dependent studies on catalytic hydrosilation of polyalkylsiloxane using NMR
- more
추천 논문
학술지 홈페이지 이용 환경은 크롬 브라우저 사용을 권장합니다.