Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

    Mainstream smoke level of harmful substances in korean domestic cigarette brands

    Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
    2018, v.31 no.1, pp.14-22
    https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2018.31.1.14








    • Downloaded
    • Viewed

    Abstract

    After signing the WHO FCTC in 2003, South Korea ratified the FCTC in 2005. This study was conducted to provide data on toxic constituents that can be used as useful information for the level of exposure to Korean smokers. Emissions data from five brands of cigarettes were tested under the ISO and “Canadian Intense (HCI)” smoking regimes, respectively. We conducted an analysis of 25 compounds containing nicotine, tar, carbonyls, phenolics, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi-VOC cigarette smoke. Tar and nicotine showed levels of 4.3 to 5.8 mg/cig and 0.4 to 0.5 mg/cig, respectively, which are within the range of tolerance presented in ISO 8243. In the case of carbonyls, formaldehyde was detected within a range of 8.2 to 14.3 μg/cig, and acetaldehyde was present within a range of 224.7 to 327.2 μg/cig under the ISO smoke regime. Crotonaldehyde was not detected under the ISO regime, and all of the carbonyls showed values 2.3 to 4.5 times higher under the HCI regime than those under the ISO regime. Catechol, which showed a level of 47.0 to 80.5 μg/cig under the ISO regime and 117.5 to 184.7 μg/cig under the HCI regime, was the highest constituent among the phenols. The amount of isoprene was 91.7 to 158.3 μg/cig under the ISO regime and 221.0 to 377.0 under the HCI regime. To summarize, most of the constituents showed a tendency to be detected at levels 2 to 4 times higher under the HCI regime than under the ISO regime. Above all, these results represent the first analysis in Korea from an independent institute of tobacco companies under accreditation of ISO 17025.

    keywords
    tobacco, hazard constituents, constituents analysis, FCTC


    Reference

    1

    D. Hammond, F. Wiebel, L. T. Kozlowski, R. Borland, K. M. Cummings, R. J. O'connor, A. McNeill, G. N. Connolly, D. Arnott, and G. T. Fong., Tob.Control., 16(1), 8-1407 (2007).

    2

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3308 (2012).

    3

    D. Y. Pazo, F. Moliere, M. M. Sampson, C. M. Reese, K. A. Agnew-Heard, M. J. Walters, M. R. Holman, B. C. Blount, C. H. Watson, and D. M. Chambers, Nicotine Tob. Res., 18(9), 1886-1894 (2016).

    4

    International Agency for Research on Cancer, Vol. 89. Lyon, FR: IARC, 427-51 (2007).

    5

    D. Hoffmann and I. Hoffmann, J. Toxicol. Env. Health., 50(4), 307-364 (1997).

    6

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO Standard 8243 (2013).

    7

    A. Eldridge, T. R. Betson, M. V. Gama, and K. McAdam, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 71(3), 409-427 (2015).

    8

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3402 (1999).

    9

    Health Canada Official Method, T-115 (1999).

    10

    M. Intorp, S. Purkis, M.Whittaker, and W. Wright, Beitrage zur Tabakforschung/Contributions to Tob. Res., 23(4), 161-202 (2009).

    11

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 8454 (2007).

    12

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10315 (2013).

    13

    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10362-1 (2013).

    14

    Health Canada Official Method, T-104 (1999).

    15

    Health Canada Official Method, T-114 (1999).

    16

    Health Canada Official Method, T-107 (1999).

    17

    Health Canada Official Method, T-116 (1999).

    18

    Health Canada Official Method, T-112 (1999).

    19

    M. Siu, N. Mladjenovic, and E. Soo, Tob. Control., 22(6), e10 (2013).

    20

    BAT, Smoke chemistry analysis, http://www.bat-science.com/groupms/sites/BAT_9GVJXS.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO7AXGGA.

    상단으로 이동

    Analytical Science and Technology