바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

대중서사연구

1964년의 담론 지형 :반공주의, 민족주의, 민주주의, 자유주의, 성장주의

The Discourse Topography of 1964 : Anti-Communism, Nationalism, Democracy, Liberalism, and Developmentism

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2009, v.0 no.22, pp.71-90
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2009..22.003
김건우 (인하대)

Abstract

1964 was the year when the discourse struggle to monopolize the causes of nationalism and modernization broke out between the Republican Party based on Anti-Communism & Developmentism and dissident groups based on democracy & progressive nationalism. As a result, the discourse topograhpy was overally being changed. Sa-sang-gye was changing, and Cheong-Maek based on progressive nationalism was founded and began to have influence on intellectual society. Although, as lats as in 1964, counter-discourses based on liberalism/democracy appeared in Sa-sang-gye, dissident groups' main thesis was shifted from democracy to nationalism. Around 1964, Sa-sang-gye camp took part in discourse struggle surrouding nationalism. And it also was the case that counter-discourse groups' nationalism was thought as anti-imperialism/anti-colonialism linked with national liberation campaign. Cheong-Maek was the main medium of that kind of discourse. Meanwhile, the sprout of the debate between engagement literature and pure literature first appeared in literary field of 1964, which was the phenomenon pararrel to the differentiation of intellectuals. It was the year when Kim Seung-Ok seriously started his career as a writer writing Mujin-Gihaeng, and it can be argued that the advent of 4‧19 generation writers represented by Kim Seung-Ok proved that the role of liberalism in korea was changed from ideology of pro-modernization intelligentia to intellectual soil of ‘new intellectuals’. And it was also the year when progressive nationalist camp was formed in literary domain.

keywords
The Discourse Topography of 1964, Anti-Communism, Nationalism, Democracy, Liberalism, Developmentism, 4‧19 generation, literature, 1964년의 담론 지형, 반공주의, 민족주의, 민주주의, 자유주의, 성장주의, 4‧19세대, 문학

참고문헌

1.

사상계 .

2.

청맥 .

3.

김주연, 김주연 평론문학선 , 문학사상사, 1992.

4.

백낙청, 민족문학과 세계문학 I , 창작과비평사, 1992.

5.

김건우, 사상계와 1950년대 문학 , 소명출판, 2003.

6.

김건우, 「4‧19세대 작가들의 초기 소설에 나타나는 ‘낙오자’ 모티프의 의미」, 한국근대문학연구 16호, 한국근대문학회, 2007, 167-192쪽.

7.

박태균, 「로스토우 제3세계 근대화론과 한국」, 역사비평 66호, 2004.봄, 136-166쪽.

8.

이봉범, 「검열의 내면화와 그 정치적 발현」, 상허학보 21집, 상허학회, 2007.10, 141-175쪽.

9.

임대식, 「1960년대 초반 지식인들의 현실인식」, 역사비평 65호, 2003.겨울, 301-336쪽.

10.

정창현, 「1960년대 반공이데올로기의 정착과 지식인층의 대북인식 변화」, 1960년대 한국의 근대화와 지식인 , 선인, 2004.

11.

조현일, 「자유주의와 우울 -김승옥론」, 민족문학사연구 30호, 민족문학사학회, 2006, 288-318쪽.

12.

황병주, 박정희 체제의 지배담론 , 한양대 사학과 박사논문, 2008.

대중서사연구