바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

  • P-ISSN1738-3188
  • E-ISSN2713-9964

A Study on the Negotiation Phases between Korean Modern Historical Novel and Drama

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)2713-9964
2010, v.0 no.24, pp.247-275
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2010..24.009

Abstract

Korean modern historical literature had been developed through the competitions and mutual interferences among different writings which have multifarious discourse properties, but the studies on it have focused on discussions about authors and works by and large. For this reason this study took notice of the negotiation phases between historical novel and drama which represent Korean modern historical literature substantially. As a result some major trends were witnessed. First, a lot of historical play texts were created and dramatized as a metafiction. Second, historical novel texts were created by referring to those play texts. Third, new historical play texts which based on those created works appeared. As it were intertextuality were actively produced. Which shows the fact that historical play texts simply were not dramatized in historical novel texts. The fact that two writings shows similar walking in a place for ‘Kookminmoonhak (nationalism literature)’ also deserves special mention. These writing agreed with the double-sidedness, imperialism and popularity narrative. This study's purpose is to analyze these two different genres' concrete connection through the midium of historical material. Additionally the cultural background from a viewpoint of sociology will be considered in this analysis process.

keywords
Korean modern historical literature, historical novel and drama, intertextuality, discourse, popularity, nationalism literature, Korean modern historical literature, historical novel and drama, intertextuality, discourse, popularity, nationalism literature, 역사문학, 역사극, 역사소설, 상호텍스트성, 담화, 대중성, 국민문학

Reference

1.

『동아일보』, 『매일신보』, 『조선일보』

2.

『國民文學』, 『劇藝術』, 『大東亞』, 『批判』, 『三千里』, 『新生』, 『人間』, 『中央公論』, 『春秋』, 『朝光』, 『學生』, 『創造』

3.

공임순, 「식민지 시대 흥망사 이야기와 여성 육체의 시각화 - 이광수의 『麻衣太子』와 유치진의 「皆骨山」, 한상직의 「長野史」를 중심으로-」, 『시학과 언어학』 vol 9, 2005, 99-137쪽.

4.

김만수, 「역사와 설화의 희곡화에 관한 고찰-함세덕의 「낙화암」과 「어밀레종」의 경우」, 『한국극예술연구』 제4집, 1994, 71-90쪽.

5.

김병길, 「한국 근대 신문연재 역사소설의 기원과 계보」, 연세대학교 박사학위논문, 2006.,

6.

김병길, 「한국 근대 역사문학의 기원과 지형」, 『국어국문학』 155호, 2010. 8, 223-248쪽.

7.

레이 초우, 정재서 옮김, 『원시적 열정』, 이산, 2004.

8.

이상우, 「표상으로서의 망국사 이야기-식민 후반기 역사극에 나타난 민족담론과 식민담론의 문제-」, 『한국극예술연구』 제25집, 2007, 55-90쪽.

9.

이상우, 『유치진 연구』, 태학사, 1997.

10.

이재명 엮음, 『해방 전(1940~1945) 공연희곡집 1』, 평민사, 2004.

11.

이재명, 『한국현대극작가론 4 송영』, 한국극예술학회 편, 태학사, 1996.

12.

이화진, 「일제 말기 역사극과 그 의미-함세덕의 「낙화암」의 경우」, 『한국극예술연구』 18집, 2003, 131-157쪽.

13.

이희환, 「동아시아에 떠도는 김옥균 서사-김옥균 연구의 서설-」, 『한국문화』 44호, 2008. 11, 75-98쪽.

14.

한수영, 『친일문학의 재인식 : 1937~1945년 간의 한국소설과 식민주의』, 소명출판, 2005.

대중서사연구