바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

영화적 시공간의 생략과 잉여 -오즈 야스지로의 <아버지가 있었다>를 중심으로 -

The Ellipsis and Surplus of the Time and Space in the Film - A Study on Yasujiro Ozu’s There was a Father -

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2011, v.0 no.26, pp.391-412
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2011..26.014
임철희 (연세대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

The Japanese film director, Yasujiro Ozu had directed 54 films since his first film The Sword of Penitence(1927). The Late Spring(1949) is generally considered as the first film of the latter part of his filmography. However, in terms of his film style, one could ask what makes distinct differences between the former and the latter part of the filmography. His early and late films have common denominators such as the ellipsis and jump of important moments in the film narrative development. This thesis is a study on the narrative characteristics of There was a Father(1942), one of early Ozu films. In other words, it could be said that the ellipsis and jump are not only the characteristic of late Ozu but one of early Ozu’s narrative. It is an attempt to divest Ozu’s films of a preconceived notion in which late Ozu is generally discussed rather than early Ozu. It is also the study of the relation between the narrative and the surplus shot. In the film There was a Father, one could see scenery and still-life shots when the important moments such as death and farewell are omitted. From this, the narrative gets stereoscopic vision rather than monotonous plot. The little and minor movement which is caused by the ellipsis and jump has an influence on the entire body of the narrative. It could be understood that Ozu’s narrative style is an effort to keep the distance from the conventional film style of the classical Hollywood. In other words, Ozu removes unnecessary elements from the film and tries to approach the nature of the cinema. Ozu’s modernity represents the stylistic experiment by innovative ways. The theme and story which can be regarded as triteness do not look old-fashioned in his films because of his creativity and originality for the film style.

keywords
Japanese film, Yasujiro Ozu, There was a Father, ellipsis and jump, surplus shot, pillow phot, still-life shot, film narrative, 일본영화, 오즈 야스지로, 아버지가 있었다, 생략과 비약, 잉여적 쇼트, 필로우 쇼트, 정물 쇼트, 영화 서사

참고문헌

1.

오즈 야스지로(감독), <아버지가 있었다 父ありき>, 쇼치쿠, 94분, 흑백, 1942.

2.

데이비드 보드웰, 김숙․안현신․최경주 역, 『영화스타일의 역사』, 한울, 2008.

3.

도날드 리치, 김태원․김시순 역, 『오즈 야스지로의 영화세계』, 현대미학사, 1995.

4.

막스 테시에, 최은미 역, 『일본영화사』, 동문선, 2000.

5.

박성수 외, 시네마테크 부산 엮음, 『오즈 야스지로』, 대경문화, 2004.

6.

에드워드 홀, 최효선 역, 『숨겨진 차원』, 한길사, 2009.

7.

잭 씨 엘리스, 변재란 역, 『세계영화사』, 이론과 실천, 1997.

8.

질 들뢰즈, 이정하 역, 『시네마Ⅱ: 시간­이미지』, 시각과 언어, 2005.

9.

하스미 시게히코, 윤용순 역, 『감독 오즈 야스지로』, 한나래, 2001.

10.

Arthur Nolletti, Reframing Japanese Cinema: Authorship, Genre, History, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.

11.

Donald Richie, Ozu: His Life and Films, Berkely: University of California Press, 1977.

12.

Freda Freiberg, “Japanese Cinema”, John Hill & Pamela Church Gibson (eds.) The Oxford Guide to Film Studies, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.

13.

Joseph L Anderson & Donald Richie, The Japanese Film: Art and Industry, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.

14.

Noel Burch, To the Distant Observer: Form and Meaning in Japanese Cinema, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

15.

Paul Schrader, Transcendental Style in Film, New York: Da Capo Press, 1988.

16.

Yoshida Kiju, Ozu’s Anti-Cinema, Translated by Daisuke Miyao & Kyoko Hirano, Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, University of Michigan, 2003.

대중서사연구