바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

대중서사연구

  • P-ISSN1738-3188
  • E-ISSN2713-9964

1930년대 소설의 신여성 재현과 신경증-『여성』에 실린 「과실」, 「세기의 화문」,「슬픈 해결」을 중심으로

Representation and Neurosis of the Modern Women Appeared in the 1930s’ Novels - Focusing on “Fruit”, “Flower Patterns of the Century” and “Sad Solution”Published in Women

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)2713-9964
2013, v.0 no.30, pp.225-258
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2013..30.007
신정숙 (연세대학교)

Abstract

This paper studied that the modern women’s various neurosis embodied in “Fruit”(1937), “Flower Patterns of the Century”(1938), “Sad Solution”(1938~39), three novels published in a representative women’s general magazine Women(1936 ~1940) in the 1930s, took place in process of the modern women’s awakening of their corporalities, desire to satisfy this, the existing solid social frame of the traditional /feudal society, and mutual confrontation and antagonism of desires to peacefully settle for this frame. These novels capture exactly awareness/thoughts of sex, love and marriage of the modern women in the mid- and late 1930s and various aspects of ‘neurosis’ happening in the gap of their real life. These neurosis seem to occur from distinct characteristics of space and time on which they were, rather than occurring from the limitation of the modern women. That is, their neurosis might start from opposition and hybridism between feudalism established firmly in space and time of the Joseon Dynasty, the mid- and late 1930s, and newly risen modernity. Therefore, in that duplicity and disruptive aspects they showed fundamentally were prosecuted by desires to transform the old custom of the traditional society, those may be the scale to show the strength of the social suppression given to the modern women distinguished from the traditional women and something to prove innovation (modernity) of the modern women. “Fruit”(1937), “Flower Patterns of the Century”(1938) and “Sad Solution”(1938~39) of the professional male writers are the representative novels that these special characteristics of the modern women were clearly embodied. “Fruit” is a novel describing that a divided attitude toward sex taken place from internalization of the modern women’s virile eyes and loss of identity paradoxically began from women’s awakening of sexual desire and a strong craving to satisfy this. “Flower Patterns of the Century” is a novel portraying that asceticism/intellectualism of the unmarried women are substitutes of women’s sexual desire hard to be satisfied in the male- centric feudal society. And “Sad Solution” is a work depicting that a modern woman’s transformation into ‘femme fatale’ results from the delay of sexual satisfaction. Like this, in that the modern women’s twofold situation represented in the above novels and the aspects of various neurosis coming from this took place from the fact that the modern women of the mid- and late 1930s could not secure their identity in the realms of sex, love and marriage, it may show the modern historic limitation they had. However, from the aspect that their various neurosis were caused by their longing for free sex, love and marriage and conflict/collision of social structure oppressing this, it may express the modern women’s innovation(modernity). In other words, neurosis of the modern women in the mid- and late 1930s may be the salient indicator showing the modern historic significance and limitation at the same time.

keywords
신여성, 신경증, 근대성, 주체성, 성(性), 연애, 결혼, 이중성, the modern woman, Neurosis, modernity, identity, sex, love, marriage, duplicity

참고문헌

1.

여성 1936. 4. ~ 1940. 12.

2.

나혜석 외, 서경석․우미영 편, 신여성, 길 위에 서다 , 호미, 2007.

3.

김경애, 「작가 김명순의 삶과 기독교 양상」, 여성과역사 17, 한국여성사학회, 2012.12.

4.

김경애, 「성폭력 피해자/생존자로서의 근대 최초 여성작가 김명순」, 여성과역사 14, 한국여성사학회, 2011. 6.

5.

김수진, 「신여성담론 생산의 식민지적 구조와 <<신여성>>」, 경제와사회 69, 비판사회학회, 2006. 3. 256쪽.

6.

김수진, 신여성, 근대의 과잉: 식미지 조선의 신여성 담론과 젠더정치, 1920~1934 , 소명출판, 2009.

7.

김연숙, 그녀들의 이야기, 신新여성 , 역락, 2011.

8.

나인호, 개념사란 무엇인가-역사와 언어의 새로운 만남 , 역사비평사, 2011.

9.

노지승, 「여성지 독자와 서사 읽기의 즐거움- 여성 (1936~1940)을 중심으로」, 현대소설연구 42, 한국현대소설학회, 2009.

10.

방민호, 「김일엽 문학의 사상적 변모 과정과 불교 선택의 의미」, 한국현대문학연구 20, 한국현대문학회, 2006. 12. 359쪽.

11.

박용옥, 「1920년대 신여성 연구」, 여성연구논총 2, 성신여대 한국여성연구소, 2001. 2.

12.

우정미, 「근대 여성지식인이 추구한 여성상」, 일본문화연구 41, 동아시아일본학회, 2012. 1.

13.

유진월, 「나혜석의 탈주 욕망과 헤테로포피아, 인문과학연구 35, 강원대학교 인문과학연구소, 2012. 12.

14.

이덕화, 여성문학에 나타난 근대체험과 타자의식 , 예림기획, 2005.

15.

이정희, 「근대 여성지 속의 자기서사 연구-성․사랑․결혼에 관한 여성의 서사를 중심으로-」, 현대소설연구 19, 한국현대소설학회, 2003.

16.

최윤정, 「김명순 문학연구」, 한국문학이론과 비평 17(3), 한국문학이론과 비평학회, 2013. 9.

17.

지그문드 프로이트, 김석희 역, 문명 속의 불만 , 열린책들, 2004, 14~23쪽.

18.

프로이트, 김정일 역, 성욕에 관한 세 편의 에세이 , 열린책들, 2004. 46~56쪽.

대중서사연구